The impact of CBCT reconstruction and calibration for radiotherapy planning in the head and neck region - a phantom study.

BACKGROUND

The applicability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) image sets for dose calculation purposes relies on high image quality and CT number accuracy. In this study we have investigated the use of stoichiometric calibration for transforming CT numbers into physical parameters, in combination with a new CBCT scatter correction algorithm, focusing on head and neck geometries.

METHODS

CBCT projections were acquired using an On-Board-Imager (OBI v1.4; Varian Medical Systems) using both low- and high-dose clinical image acquisition protocols. The CBCT projections were reconstructed twice, using both the standard method (OBI) as well as an experimental pre-clinical reconstruction algorithm (Full Fan Experimental - FFE). Stoichiometric calibration was performed using both a phantom from CIRS with nine tissue equivalent inserts (ranging from lung to dense bone) as well as with a custom made cylindrical PMMA head and neck phantom with variable 'head' diameter and with cavities designed to fit the inserts from a Gammex RMI phantom. To benchmark the CBCT performance, the same calibration procedures were performed using two conventional CT scanners. For assessment of influence on dose-volume parameters, the head part of the anthropomorphic Alderson phantom was scanned, reconstructed with both CT and CBCT using the stoichiometric calibration curves, and finally used to compare IMRT dose calculations.

RESULTS

The stoichiometric CBCT calibrations with the CIRS phantom resulted in an excellent fit between calculated and measured CT numbers (R = 1.000 for all combinations tested), equivalent to the results for the conventional scanners. Using the PMMA phantom, the stoichiometric calibration curves again showed excellent agreement, although the OBI reconstruction showed marginally increasing deviation from the unity line as the phantom size decreased. For the dose-volume parameters, deviations well within 1% were seen between the different reconstruction methods and acquisition modes.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that the combination of an improved reconstruction method and stoichiometric calibration improved the CT number accuracy of CBCT scans acquired for head and neck phantoms. In particular, a radial size dependence of the scanned object similar to that in conventional CT could be achieved. Although high density inhomogeneities still are challenging for the reconstruction process, clinically acceptable agreement in key dose-volume parameters between CT-based and CBCT-based IMRT planning calculations on a humanoid phantom was found.