Tomás-Barberán Francisco A, García-Villalba Rocío, González-Sarrías Antonio, Selma María V, Espín Juan C
Research Group on Quality, Safety and Bioactivity of Plant Foods, CEBAS-CSIC, P.O. Box 164, 30100 Espinardo, Murcia, Spain.
J Agric Food Chem. 2014 Jul 16;62(28):6535-8. doi: 10.1021/jf5024615. Epub 2014 Jul 1.
Three phenotypes for urolithin production after ellagitannin and ellagic acid intake are consistently observed in different human intervention trials. Subjects can be stratified into three urolithin-producing groups. "Phenotype A" produced only urolithin A conjugates, which included between 25 and 80% of the volunteers in the different trials. "Phenotype B" produced isourolithin A and/or urolithin B in addition to urolithin A, this being the second relevant group (10-50%). "Phenotype 0" (5-25%) was that in which these urolithins were not detected. The three phenotypes were observed independently of the volunteers' health status and demographic characteristics (age, gender, body mass index (BMI)) and of the amount or type of ellagitannin food source ingested (walnuts and other nuts, strawberries, raspberries, and other berries or pomegranates). Interestingly, a higher percentage of phenotype B was observed in those volunteers with chronic illness (metabolic syndrome or colorectal cancer) associated with gut microbial imbalance (dysbiosis). These urolithin phenotypes could show differences in the human gut microbiota and should be considered in intervention trials dealing with health benefits of ellagitannins or ellagic acid. Whether this phenotypic variation could be a biomarker related to differential health benefits or illness predisposition deserves further research.
在不同的人体干预试验中, consistently观察到摄入鞣花单宁和鞣花酸后尿石素产生的三种表型。受试者可分为三个尿石素产生组。“A表型”仅产生尿石素A缀合物,在不同试验中,该组志愿者占25%至80%。“B表型”除尿石素A外,还产生异尿石素A和/或尿石素B,这是第二个相关组(10%至50%)。“0表型”(5%至25%)是未检测到这些尿石素的组。这三种表型的观察结果与志愿者的健康状况、人口统计学特征(年龄、性别、体重指数(BMI))以及摄入的鞣花单宁食物来源的数量或类型(核桃和其他坚果、草莓、树莓和其他浆果或石榴)无关。有趣的是,在患有与肠道微生物失衡(生态失调)相关的慢性病(代谢综合征或结直肠癌)的志愿者中,观察到B表型的比例更高。这些尿石素表型可能在人体肠道微生物群中存在差异,在涉及鞣花单宁或鞣花酸健康益处的干预试验中应予以考虑。这种表型变异是否可能是与不同健康益处或疾病易感性相关的生物标志物,值得进一步研究。