Clarke A M, Zemcov S J
Division of Medical Microbiology, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1989 Feb;8(2):164-8. doi: 10.1007/BF01963905.
The in vitro activity of lomefloxacin, a new difluoroquinolone, was compared with that of norfloxacin, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin and ceftazidime against a total of 577 recent clinical isolates. MICs were determined by a standard agar dilution procedure, and two inocula (10(4) and 10(6) CFU) were used throughout. Lomefloxacin inhibited most species of the Enterobacteriaceae, Staphylococcus aureus (including methicillin-resistant strains) and Haemophilus influenzae at less than or equal to 1 mg/l. Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MIC 90, 4 mg/l) was somewhat more resistant, and Pseudomonas maltophilia (MIC 90, 16 mg/l) and the Bacteroides fragilis group (MIC 90, 32 mg/l) were considerably more resistant. Overall, lomefloxacin was as active as norfloxacin, but was two- to eightfold less active than ciprofloxacin against most species tested.
将新型二氟喹诺酮类药物洛美沙星的体外活性与诺氟沙星、环丙沙星、庆大霉素和头孢他啶进行比较,以检测总共577株近期临床分离菌株。采用标准琼脂稀释法测定最低抑菌浓度(MIC),并始终使用两种接种量(10⁴和10⁶CFU)。洛美沙星对大多数肠杆菌科细菌、金黄色葡萄球菌(包括耐甲氧西林菌株)和流感嗜血杆菌的抑制浓度小于或等于1mg/L。铜绿假单胞菌(MIC90为4mg/L)的耐药性稍高,嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌(MIC90为16mg/L)和脆弱拟杆菌群(MIC90为32mg/L)的耐药性则高得多。总体而言,洛美沙星的活性与诺氟沙星相当,但对大多数测试菌株的活性比环丙沙星低两到八倍。