Wells Cherie, Kolt Gregory S, Marshall Paul, Hill Bridget, Bialocerkowski Andrea
Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Bruce, Australian Capital Territory, Australia; School of Science and Health, University of Western Sydney, Campbelltown, New South Wales, Australia.
School of Science and Health, University of Western Sydney, Campbelltown, New South Wales, Australia.
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 1;9(7):e100402. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100402. eCollection 2014.
To evaluate the effectiveness of Pilates exercise in people with chronic low back pain (CLBP) through a systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs).
A search for RCTs was undertaken using Medical Search Terms and synonyms for "Pilates" and "low back pain" within the maximal date range of 10 databases. Databases included the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature; Cochrane Library; Medline; Physiotherapy Evidence Database; ProQuest: Health and Medical Complete, Nursing and Allied Health Source, Dissertation and Theses; Scopus; Sport Discus; Web of Science.
Two independent reviewers were involved in the selection of evidence. To be included, relevant RCTs needed to be published in the English language. From 152 studies, 14 RCTs were included.
Two independent reviewers appraised the methodological quality of RCTs using the McMaster Critical Review Form for Quantitative Studies. The author(s), year of publication, and details regarding participants, Pilates exercise, comparison treatments, and outcome measures, and findings, were then extracted.
The methodological quality of RCTs ranged from "poor" to "excellent". A meta-analysis of RCTs was not undertaken due to the heterogeneity of RCTs. Pilates exercise provided statistically significant improvements in pain and functional ability compared to usual care and physical activity between 4 and 15 weeks, but not at 24 weeks. There were no consistent statistically significant differences in improvements in pain and functional ability with Pilates exercise, massage therapy, or other forms of exercise at any time period.
Pilates exercise offers greater improvements in pain and functional ability compared to usual care and physical activity in the short term. Pilates exercise offers equivalent improvements to massage therapy and other forms of exercise. Future research should explore optimal Pilates exercise designs, and whether some people with CLBP may benefit from Pilates exercise more than others.
通过对随机对照试验(RCT)进行系统评价,评估普拉提运动对慢性下腰痛(CLBP)患者的有效性。
在10个数据库的最大日期范围内,使用医学搜索词以及“普拉提”和“下腰痛”的同义词搜索RCT。数据库包括护理及相关健康文献累积索引;考克兰图书馆;医学索引;物理治疗证据数据库;ProQuest:健康与医学全集、护理及相关健康资源、学位论文;Scopus;体育文摘数据库;科学引文索引。
两名独立评审员参与证据选择。纳入的相关RCT需以英文发表。从152项研究中,纳入了14项RCT。
两名独立评审员使用麦克马斯特定量研究批判性评价表评估RCT的方法学质量。然后提取作者、发表年份以及关于参与者、普拉提运动、对照治疗、结局指标和研究结果的详细信息。
RCT的方法学质量从“差”到“优”不等。由于RCT的异质性,未进行RCT的荟萃分析。与常规护理和体育活动相比,普拉提运动在4至15周时能使疼痛和功能能力有统计学意义的改善,但在24周时没有。在任何时间段,普拉提运动、按摩疗法或其他形式的运动在疼痛和功能能力改善方面均无一致的统计学显著差异。
与常规护理和体育活动相比,普拉提运动在短期内能使疼痛和功能能力有更大改善。普拉提运动与按摩疗法和其他形式的运动效果相当。未来的研究应探索最佳的普拉提运动设计,以及一些CLBP患者是否比其他人更能从普拉提运动中获益。