Suppr超能文献

南非人类鼻病毒的遗传多样性与分子流行病学

Genetic diversity and molecular epidemiology of human rhinoviruses in South Africa.

作者信息

Pretorius Marthi A, Tempia Stefano, Treurnicht Florette K, Walaza Sibongile, Cohen Adam L, Moyes Jocelyn, Hellferscee Orienka, Variava Ebrahim, Dawood Halima, Chhagan Meera, Haffjee Sumayya, Madhi Shabir A, Cohen Cheryl, Venter Marietjie

机构信息

Centre for Respiratory Diseases and Meningitis, National Institute for Communicable Diseases of the National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa; Department of Medical Virology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.

出版信息

Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2014 Sep;8(5):567-73. doi: 10.1111/irv.12264. Epub 2014 Jul 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Rhinoviruses (RV) are a well-established cause of respiratory illness. RV-C has been associated with more severe illness. We aimed to characterize and compare the clinical presentations and disease severity of different RV type circulating in South Africa.

METHOD

We performed two analyses of RV-positive specimens identified through surveillance in South Africa across all age groups. First, RV-positive specimens identified through severe acute respiratory illness (SARI) surveillance in four provinces was randomly selected from 2009 to 2010 for molecular characterization. Second, RV-positive specimens identified through SARI, influenza-like illness (ILI) and control surveillance at hospitals and outpatient clinics in during 2012-2013 were used to determine the association of RV type with severe disease. Selected specimens were sequenced, and phylogenetic analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Among the 599 sequenced specimens from 2009 to 2010 and 2012 to 2013, RV-A (285, 48%) and RV-C (247, 41%) were more commonly identified than RV-B (67, 11%), with no seasonality and a high genetic diversity. A higher prevalence of RV infection was identified in cases with SARI [515/962 (26%); aRRR = 1.6; 95% CI 1.21; 2.2] and ILI [356/962 (28%); aRRR = 1.9; 95% CI 1.37; 2.6] compared with asymptomatic controls (91/962, 22%). There was no difference in disease severity between the different type when comparing SARI, ILI and controls.

CONCLUSION

All three type of RV were identified in South Africa, although RV-A and RV-C were more common than RV-B. RV was associated with symptomatic respiratory illness; however, there was no association between RV type and disease severity.

摘要

背景

鼻病毒(RV)是一种公认的呼吸道疾病病因。RV-C与更严重的疾病有关。我们旨在对南非流行的不同RV类型的临床表现和疾病严重程度进行特征描述和比较。

方法

我们对通过南非各年龄组监测识别出的RV阳性标本进行了两项分析。首先,从2009年至2010年在四个省份通过严重急性呼吸道疾病(SARI)监测识别出的RV阳性标本中随机选取进行分子特征分析。其次,将2012年至2013年期间在医院和门诊通过SARI、流感样疾病(ILI)和对照监测识别出的RV阳性标本用于确定RV类型与严重疾病的关联。对选定的标本进行测序,并进行系统发育分析。

结果

在2009年至2010年以及2012年至2013年的599份测序标本中,RV-A(285份,48%)和RV-C(247份,41%)比RV-B(67份,11%)更常见,无季节性且遗传多样性高。与无症状对照(91/962,22%)相比,SARI患者中RV感染的患病率更高[515/962(26%);调整后相对风险率=1.6;95%可信区间1.21;2.2],ILI患者中RV感染的患病率也更高[356/962(28%);调整后相对风险率=1.9;95%可信区间1.37;2.6]。比较SARI、ILI和对照时,不同类型之间的疾病严重程度没有差异。

结论

在南非发现了所有三种类型的RV,尽管RV-A和RV-C比RV-B更常见。RV与有症状的呼吸道疾病有关;然而,RV类型与疾病严重程度之间没有关联。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce72/4181821/c298665703e8/irv0008-0567-f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验