Suppr超能文献

维生素D受体基因多态性与良性前列腺增生风险的Meta分析

Meta-analysis of vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms and benign prostatic hyperplasia risk.

作者信息

Zeng Xian-Tao, Yao Qi-Sheng, Weng Hong, Li Sheng, Huang Jing-Yu, Wang Xing-Huan

机构信息

Center for Evidence-Based Medicine and Clinical Research, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, 442000, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Mol Biol Rep. 2014 Oct;41(10):6713-7. doi: 10.1007/s11033-014-3554-2. Epub 2014 Jul 3.

Abstract

The association between vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene polymorphisms and risk of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) has been investigated in numerous publications, but published results remain inconclusive. Hence, we conducted this meta-analysis to derive a more precise conclusion. Four polymorphisms (Taq-I, Bsm-I, Apa-I, and Fok-I) of the VDR gene with risk of BPH from six case-control studies and one cohort study involving 2,248 individuals were identified from PubMed and China National Knowledge Internet databases up to November 20, 2013 (updated on March 5, 2014). After data extraction, the meta-analysis was performed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software. All four VDR polymorphisms were not associated with the risk of BPH [Taq-I: OR 0.61, 95 % CI (0.38-1.24) for tt vs. TT; Bsm-I: OR 1.27, 95 % CI (0.96-1.69) for bb vs. BB; Apa-I: OR 1.26, 95 % CI (0.64-2.46) for aa vs. AA; Fok-I: OR 0.95, 95 % CI (0.60-1.50) for ff vs. FF]. Subgroup analysis according to ethnicity for Taq-I polymorphism also showed that the polymorphism was not associated with risk of BPH for either Caucasians [OR 0.74, 95 % CI (0.31-1.78) for tt vs. TT] or Asians [OR 0.35, 95 % CI (0.11-1.11) for tt vs. TT]. However, results of this meta-analysis should be treated with caution because this meta-analysis has several limitations. We propose to conduct a high-quality study with large sample size to further identify the association between VDR gene polymorphisms and BPH susceptibility.

摘要

维生素D受体(VDR)基因多态性与良性前列腺增生(BPH)风险之间的关联已在众多出版物中进行了研究,但已发表的结果仍无定论。因此,我们进行了这项荟萃分析以得出更精确的结论。截至2013年11月20日(2014年3月5日更新),从PubMed和中国知网数据库中确定了六项病例对照研究和一项队列研究中的VDR基因的四种多态性(Taq-I、Bsm-I、Apa-I和Fok-I)与2248名个体的BPH风险。数据提取后,使用综合荟萃分析软件进行荟萃分析。所有四种VDR多态性均与BPH风险无关[Taq-I:tt与TT相比,OR为0.61,95%CI(0.38-1.24);Bsm-I:bb与BB相比,OR为1.27,95%CI(0.96-1.69);Apa-I:aa与AA相比,OR为1.26,95%CI(0.64-2.46);Fok-I:ff与FF相比,OR为0.95,95%CI(0.60-1.50)]。根据种族对Taq-I多态性进行的亚组分析还表明,该多态性与白种人[tt与TT相比,OR为0.74,95%CI(0.31-1.78)]或亚洲人[tt与TT相比,OR为0.35,95%CI(0.11-1.11)]的BPH风险均无关。然而,由于本荟萃分析存在若干局限性,其结果应谨慎对待。我们建议进行一项大样本量的高质量研究,以进一步确定VDR基因多态性与BPH易感性之间的关联。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验