Mäki-Tanila Asko, Hill William G
Biotechnology and Food Research, MTT Agrifood Research Finland, 31600 Jokioinen, Finland
Institute of Evolutionary Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, United Kingdom.
Genetics. 2014 Sep;198(1):355-67. doi: 10.1534/genetics.114.165282. Epub 2014 Jul 1.
Although research effort is being expended into determining the importance of epistasis and epistatic variance for complex traits, there is considerable controversy about their importance. Here we undertake an analysis for quantitative traits utilizing a range of multilocus quantitative genetic models and gene frequency distributions, focusing on the potential magnitude of the epistatic variance. All the epistatic terms involving a particular locus appear in its average effect, with the number of two-locus interaction terms increasing in proportion to the square of the number of loci and that of third order as the cube and so on. Hence multilocus epistasis makes substantial contributions to the additive variance and does not, per se, lead to large increases in the nonadditive part of the genotypic variance. Even though this proportion can be high where epistasis is antagonistic to direct effects, it reduces with multiple loci. As the magnitude of the epistatic variance depends critically on the heterozygosity, for models where frequencies are widely dispersed, such as for selectively neutral mutations, contributions of epistatic variance are always small. Epistasis may be important in understanding the genetic architecture, for example, of function or human disease, but that does not imply that loci exhibiting it will contribute much genetic variance. Overall we conclude that theoretical predictions and experimental observations of low amounts of epistatic variance in outbred populations are concordant. It is not a likely source of missing heritability, for example, or major influence on predictions of rates of evolution.
尽管目前正在投入研究精力来确定上位性及上位性方差对复杂性状的重要性,但关于它们的重要性仍存在相当大的争议。在此,我们利用一系列多位点数量遗传模型和基因频率分布对数量性状进行分析,重点关注上位性方差的潜在大小。所有涉及特定位点的上位性项都出现在其平均效应中,两位点相互作用项的数量与位点数量的平方成正比增加,三阶项则与位点数量的立方成正比增加,以此类推。因此,多位点上位性对加性方差有重大贡献,但其本身并不会导致基因型方差的非加性部分大幅增加。即使在某些情况下,上位性与直接效应相互拮抗时,该比例可能会很高,但随着位点数量的增加,它会降低。由于上位性方差的大小严重依赖于杂合性,对于基因频率广泛分散的模型,例如选择性中性突变的模型,上位性方差的贡献总是很小。上位性在理解功能或人类疾病等的遗传结构方面可能很重要,但这并不意味着表现出上位性的位点会贡献大量的遗传方差。总体而言,我们得出结论,远交群体中上位性方差较低的理论预测和实验观察结果是一致的。例如,它不太可能是缺失遗传力的来源,也不太可能对进化速率的预测产生重大影响。