New York University, New York.
Manhattan Veterans Affairs Medical Center, New York, New York.
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Oct 1;3(10):1393-1398. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.3600.
Active surveillance is an important option to reduce prostate cancer overtreatment, but it remains underutilized in many countries. Models from the United States show that greater use of active surveillance is important for prostate cancer screening to be cost-effective.
To perform an up-to-date, nationwide, population-based study on use of active surveillance for localized prostate cancer in Sweden.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional study in the National Prostate Cancer Register (NPCR) of Sweden from 2009 through 2014. The NPCR has data on 98% of prostate cancers diagnosed in Sweden and has comprehensive linkages to other nationwide databases. Overall, 32 518 men with a median age of 67 years were diagnosed with favorable-risk prostate cancer, including 4693, 15 403, and 17 115 men with very-low-risk (subset of the low-risk group) (clinical stage, T1c; Gleason score, ≤6; prostate-specific antigen [PSA], <10 ng/mL; PSA density <0.15 ng/mL/cm3; and <8-mm total cancer length in ≤4 positive biopsy cores), low-risk (including all men in the very-low-risk group) (T1-T2; Gleason score, ≤6; and PSA, <10 ng/mL), and intermediate-risk disease (T1-T2 with Gleason score, 7 and/or PSA, 10-20 ng/mL).
Diagnosis with favorable-risk prostate cancer.
Utilization of active surveillance.
The use of active surveillance increased in men of all ages from 57% (380 of 665) to 91% (939 of 1027) for very-low-risk prostate cancer and from 40% (1159 of 2895) to 74% (1951 of 2644) for low-risk prostate cancer, with the strongest increase occurring from 2011 onward. Among men aged 50 to 59 years, 88% (211 of 240) with very-low-risk and 68% (351 of 518) with low-risk disease chose active surveillance in 2014. Use of active surveillance for intermediate-risk disease remained lower, 19% (561 of 3030) in 2014.
Active surveillance has become the dominant management for low-risk prostate cancer among men in Sweden, with the highest rates yet reported and almost complete uptake for very-low-risk cancer. These data should serve as a benchmark to compare the use of active surveillance for favorable-risk disease around the world.
主动监测是减少前列腺癌过度治疗的重要选择,但在许多国家的应用仍不充分。来自美国的模型表明,增加主动监测的应用对于前列腺癌筛查具有成本效益非常重要。
在瑞典全国范围内进行一项基于人群的关于局限性前列腺癌应用主动监测的最新研究。
设计、设置和参与者:这是一项在瑞典全国前列腺癌登记处(NPCR)进行的 2009 年至 2014 年的横断面研究。NPCR 有瑞典诊断的 98%前列腺癌的数据,并且与其他全国性数据库有全面的链接。总体而言,32518 名中位年龄为 67 岁的男性被诊断为低危前列腺癌,其中 4693 名、15403 名和 17115 名男性为极低危(低危组的一个子集)(临床分期,T1c;Gleason 评分,≤6;前列腺特异性抗原[PSA],<10ng/mL;PSA 密度<0.15ng/mL/cm3;在 4 个阳性活检核心中,总癌症长度<8mm)、低危(包括极低危组的所有男性)(T1-T2;Gleason 评分,≤6;PSA,<10ng/mL)和中危疾病(T1-T2,Gleason 评分 7 和/或 PSA,10-20ng/mL)。
诊断为低危前列腺癌。
主动监测的应用情况。
各年龄段男性的主动监测应用率均有所增加,极低危前列腺癌从 57%(380/665)增加到 91%(939/1027),低危前列腺癌从 40%(1159/2895)增加到 74%(1951/2644),自 2011 年以来增幅最大。在 50 至 59 岁的男性中,2014 年极低危和低危疾病分别有 88%(211/240)和 68%(351/518)选择主动监测。中危疾病的主动监测使用率仍较低,2014 年为 19%(561/3030)。
主动监测已成为瑞典低危前列腺癌男性的主要治疗方法,其使用率达到了迄今为止最高的水平,极低危癌症的使用率几乎达到了 100%。这些数据应作为全球范围内评估有利风险疾病应用主动监测的基准。