Kb Nalini, Cherian Anusha, Balachander Hemavathi, Kumar C Yashavantha
Assistant Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain, MS Ramaiah Medical College and Hospital , Bangalore, India .
Assistant Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain, Jipmer , Puducherry, India .
J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 May;8(5):GC01-4. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/8144.4393. Epub 2014 May 15.
Puerperal sterilization requires a rapid recovery of the mother so that she can take care of her child. Propofol with fentanyl (PF) is an option, but is associated with intraoperative hypotension, respiratory depression and an unsatisfactory postoperative recovery profile. Propofol with ketamine (PK) appears to be an alternative in terms of haemodynamic stability and analgesia.
This randomized clinical trial involved 60 patients who were scheduled to undergo puerperal sterilization, who belonged to American society of anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status 1. Patients were randomly allocated to receive either ketamine - propofol infusion in a concentration of 8mg/ml each (group PK) or fentanyl 2μg/kg intravenously, followed by an infusion of propofol in a concentration of 8mg/ml (group PF). In both the groups, the infusion was started at 300ml/hr till patient lost consciousness. Subsequently, the rate was set at 1.5ml/kg/hr for group PF and at 0.75ml/kg/hr for group PK. After the initial 10 minutes, the infusion rate was reduced to 1ml/kg/hr for group PF and to 0.5ml/kg/hr for group PK. Blood pressure and saturation were the primary outcomes which were measured.
Patients from group PF recorded a significant drop in the systolic blood pressure from the 5(th) minute, in diastolic pressure from the 10(th) minute and transient oxygen desaturation, as compared to group PK. Patients in group PK had adequate surgical conditions and better recovery profiles in terms of pain and sedation.
The combination of ketamine and propofol is a safe and possibly superior alternative to propofol - fentanyl combination in patients who undergo puerperal sterilization, in terms of haemodynamic stability and respiratory depression.
产后绝育要求母亲迅速恢复,以便能够照顾孩子。丙泊酚联合芬太尼(PF)是一种选择,但与术中低血压、呼吸抑制以及术后恢复情况不佳有关。丙泊酚联合氯胺酮(PK)在血流动力学稳定性和镇痛方面似乎是一种替代方案。
这项随机临床试验纳入了60例计划接受产后绝育的患者,这些患者属于美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)身体状况1级。患者被随机分配,分别接受浓度均为8mg/ml的氯胺酮-丙泊酚输注(PK组)或静脉注射2μg/kg芬太尼,随后输注浓度为8mg/ml的丙泊酚(PF组)。在两组中,输注均以300ml/hr开始,直至患者失去意识。随后,PF组的输注速率设定为1.5ml/kg/hr,PK组为0.75ml/kg/hr。最初10分钟后,PF组的输注速率降至1ml/kg/hr,PK组降至0.5ml/kg/hr。测量的主要结果是血压和饱和度。
与PK组相比,PF组患者从第5分钟开始收缩压显著下降,从第10分钟开始舒张压显著下降,并出现短暂的氧饱和度降低。PK组患者在手术条件方面足够,在疼痛和镇静方面恢复情况更好。
在产后绝育患者中,就血流动力学稳定性和呼吸抑制而言,氯胺酮和丙泊酚的联合使用是丙泊酚-芬太尼联合使用的一种安全且可能更优的替代方案。