Varatharajan Lavanya, Williams Katherine, Moore Hayley, Davies Alun Huw
Academic Section of Vascular Surgery, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Academic Section of Vascular Surgery, Imperial College London, London, UK
Phlebology. 2015 Oct;30(9):648-50. doi: 10.1177/0268355514542682. Epub 2014 Jul 4.
This pilot study aims to determine the effect of the Revitive™ footplate neuromuscular electrical stimulation device on venous and arterial haemodynamic changes in healthy individuals.
The blood flow (cc/min) and time averaged mean velocity (cm/s) of the superficial femoral vein and artery were measured using ultrasound at baseline, 15 min during, and immediately after cessation of the 30 min stimulation cycle. Data were analysed using the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test.
Venous and arterial duplex ultrasound haemodynamic measurements were taken in 10 and 20 healthy volunteers, respectively. Mean age 38.7 (range 21-64), ankle brachial pressure index 0.9-1.0. At 15 min, there was a significant increase in venous median blood flow (88.3 cc/min, p = 0.014) and an increase in time averaged mean velocity (1.13 cm/s, p = 0.065) compared to baseline. Similarly, there was a significant increase in arterial median blood flow (38.7 cc/min, p < 0.0001) and time averaged mean velocity (2.21 cm/s, p = 0.0003) at 15 min compared to baseline. There was no significant difference in venous or arterial measurements compared to baseline after stimulation cessation.
Blood flow and time averaged mean velocity increased during neuromuscular electrical stimulation but returned to baseline once stimulation had stopped. By improving blood flow, neuromuscular electrical stimulation has the ability to enhance venous return, counteract venous stasis and improve limb arterial inflow.
本初步研究旨在确定Revitive™脚踏板神经肌肉电刺激装置对健康个体静脉和动脉血流动力学变化的影响。
在基线、30分钟刺激周期进行期间的15分钟以及刺激停止后立即使用超声测量股浅静脉和动脉的血流(毫升/分钟)和时间平均平均速度(厘米/秒)。使用Wilcoxon配对符号秩检验分析数据。
分别对10名和20名健康志愿者进行了静脉和动脉双功超声血流动力学测量。平均年龄38.7岁(范围21 - 64岁),踝臂压力指数0.9 - 1.0。在15分钟时,与基线相比,静脉中位血流显著增加(88.3毫升/分钟,p = 0.014),时间平均平均速度增加(1.13厘米/秒,p = 0.065)。同样,与基线相比,在15分钟时动脉中位血流显著增加(38.7毫升/分钟,p < 0.0001),时间平均平均速度增加(2.21厘米/秒,p = 0.0003)。刺激停止后与基线相比,静脉或动脉测量值无显著差异。
神经肌肉电刺激期间血流和时间平均平均速度增加,但刺激停止后恢复到基线水平。通过改善血流,神经肌肉电刺激有能力增强静脉回流、对抗静脉淤滞并改善肢体动脉血流。