McEvoy Claire T, Cardwell Christopher R, Woodside Jayne V, Young Ian S, Hunter Steven J, McKinley Michelle C
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014 Nov;114(11):1759-75.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2014.05.001. Epub 2014 Jul 4.
Our review and meta-analysis examined the association between a posteriori-derived dietary patterns (DPs) and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for articles published up to July 2012 and data were extracted by two independent reviewers. Overall, 19 cross-sectional, 12 prospective cohort, and two nested case-control studies were eligible for inclusion. Results from cross-sectional studies reported an inconsistent association between DPs and measures of insulin resistance and/or glucose abnormalities, or prevalence of type 2 diabetes. A meta-analysis was carried out on nine prospective cohort studies that had examined DPs derived by principle component/factor analysis and incidence of type 2 diabetes risk (totaling 309,430 participants and 16,644 incident cases). Multivariate-adjusted odds ratios were combined using a random-effects meta-analysis. Two broad DPs (Healthy/Prudent and Unhealthy/Western) were identified based on food factor loadings published in original studies. Pooled results indicated a 15% lower type 2 diabetes risk for those in the highest category of Healthy/Prudent pattern compared with those in the lowest category (95% CI 0.80 to 0.91; P<0.0001). Compared with the lowest category of Unhealthy/Western DP, those in the highest category had a 41% increased risk of type 2 diabetes (95% CI 1.32 to 1.52; P<0.0001). These results provide evidence that DPs are consistently associated with risk of type 2 diabetes even when other lifestyle factors are controlled for. Thus, greater adherence to a DP characterized by high intakes of fruit, vegetables, and complex carbohydrate and low intakes of refined carbohydrate, processed meat, and fried food may be one strategy that could have a positive influence on the global public health burden of type 2 diabetes.
我们的综述和荟萃分析研究了事后推导的饮食模式(DPs)与2型糖尿病风险之间的关联。检索了MEDLINE和EMBASE数据库中截至2012年7月发表的文章,并由两名独立审阅者提取数据。总体而言,19项横断面研究、12项前瞻性队列研究和2项巢式病例对照研究符合纳入标准。横断面研究的结果显示,DPs与胰岛素抵抗和/或血糖异常指标或2型糖尿病患病率之间的关联不一致。对9项前瞻性队列研究进行了荟萃分析,这些研究考察了通过主成分/因子分析推导的DPs与2型糖尿病风险发生率(总计309430名参与者和16644例发病病例)。使用随机效应荟萃分析合并多变量调整后的优势比。根据原始研究中公布的食物因子负荷确定了两种宽泛的DPs(健康/谨慎型和不健康/西方型)。汇总结果表明,与最低类别相比,处于健康/谨慎型模式最高类别的人群患2型糖尿病的风险降低15%(95%CI 0.80至0.91;P<0.0001)。与不健康/西方型DP最低类别相比,最高类别的人群患2型糖尿病的风险增加41%(95%CI 1.32至1.52;P<0.0001)。这些结果提供了证据,表明即使在控制了其他生活方式因素的情况下,DPs仍与2型糖尿病风险持续相关。因此,更多地坚持以高摄入水果、蔬菜和复合碳水化合物以及低摄入精制碳水化合物、加工肉类和油炸食品为特征的DPs可能是一种对2型糖尿病全球公共卫生负担产生积极影响的策略。