Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, New York University School of Medicine , New York, NY , USA.
Center for the Promotion of Research Involving Innovative Statistical Methodology, Steinhardt School of Culture, Education and Human Development, New York University , New York, NY , USA.
Front Neurol. 2014 Jun 23;5:106. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2014.00106. eCollection 2014.
In order to develop evidence-based rehabilitation protocols post-stroke, one must first reconcile the vast heterogeneity in the post-stroke population and develop protocols to facilitate motor learning in the various subgroups. The main purpose of this study is to show that auditory constraints interact with the stage of recovery post-stroke to influence motor learning. We characterized the stages of upper limb recovery using task-based kinematic measures in 20 subjects with chronic hemiparesis. We used a bimanual wrist extension task, performed with a custom-made wrist trainer, to facilitate learning of wrist extension in the paretic hand under four auditory conditions: (1) without auditory cueing; (2) to non-musical happy sounds; (3) to self-selected music; and (4) to a metronome beat set at a comfortable tempo. Two bimanual trials (15 s each) were followed by one unimanual trial with the paretic hand over six cycles under each condition. Clinical metrics, wrist and arm kinematics, and electromyographic activity were recorded. Hierarchical cluster analysis with the Mahalanobis metric based on baseline speed and extent of wrist movement stratified subjects into three distinct groups, which reflected their stage of recovery: spastic paresis, spastic co-contraction, and minimal paresis. In spastic paresis, the metronome beat increased wrist extension, but also increased muscle co-activation across the wrist. In contrast, in spastic co-contraction, no auditory stimulation increased wrist extension and reduced co-activation. In minimal paresis, wrist extension did not improve under any condition. The results suggest that auditory task constraints interact with stage of recovery during motor learning after stroke, perhaps due to recruitment of distinct neural substrates over the course of recovery. The findings advance our understanding of the mechanisms of progression of motor recovery and lay the foundation for personalized treatment algorithms post-stroke.
为了制定基于证据的脑卒中后康复方案,首先必须协调脑卒中后人群中的巨大异质性,并制定方案以促进各个亚组的运动学习。本研究的主要目的是表明听觉约束与脑卒中后恢复的阶段相互作用,从而影响运动学习。我们使用基于任务的运动学测量方法,对 20 名慢性偏瘫患者进行上肢恢复阶段的特征描述。我们使用定制的腕部训练器进行双手腕伸展任务,在四种听觉条件下促进患手腕伸展的学习:(1)无听觉提示;(2)非音乐快乐声音;(3)自选音乐;(4)以舒适节奏设置的节拍器节拍。在每个条件下进行六轮试验,两轮双腕试验(各 15 秒)后,进行一轮患手单臂试验。记录临床指标、腕部和手臂运动学以及肌电图活动。基于基线速度和腕部运动幅度的 Mahalanobis 度量的分层聚类分析将受试者分为三个不同的组,反映了他们的恢复阶段:痉挛性弛缓、痉挛性共收缩和最小性弛缓。在痉挛性弛缓中,节拍器节拍增加了腕部伸展,但也增加了整个腕部的肌肉协同激活。相比之下,在痉挛性共收缩中,没有任何听觉刺激可以增加腕部伸展并减少协同激活。在最小性弛缓中,在任何情况下腕部伸展都没有改善。结果表明,听觉任务约束与脑卒中后运动学习过程中的恢复阶段相互作用,这可能是由于在恢复过程中募集了不同的神经基质。研究结果加深了我们对运动恢复进展的机制的理解,并为脑卒中后制定个性化治疗算法奠定了基础。