Suppr超能文献

头部模型与电源成像:对38例癫痫患者的研究。

Head model and electrical source imaging: a study of 38 epileptic patients.

作者信息

Birot Gwénael, Spinelli Laurent, Vulliémoz Serge, Mégevand Pierre, Brunet Denis, Seeck Margitta, Michel Christoph M

机构信息

Department of Fundamental and Clinical Neurosciences, University of Geneva, Rue Michel Servet 1, 1211 Genève, Switzerland.

EEG and Epilepsy Unit, Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1205 Genève, Switzerland.

出版信息

Neuroimage Clin. 2014 Jun 16;5:77-83. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2014.06.005. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

Electrical source imaging (ESI) aims at reconstructing the electrical brain activity from scalp EEG. When applied to interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs), this technique is of great use for identifying the irritative zone in focal epilepsies. Inaccuracies in the modeling of electro-magnetic field propagation in the head (forward model) may strongly influence ESI and lead to mislocalization of IED generators. However, a systematic study on the influence of the selected head model on the localization precision of IED in a large number of patients with known focus localization has not yet been performed. We here present such a performance evaluation of different head models in a dataset of 38 epileptic patients who have undergone high-density scalp EEG, intracranial EEG and, for the majority, subsequent surgery. We compared ESI accuracy resulting from three head models: a Locally Spherical Model with Anatomical Constraints (LSMAC), a Boundary Element Model (BEM) and a Finite Element Model (FEM). All of them were computed from the individual MRI of the patient and ESI was performed on averaged IED. We found that all head models provided very similar source locations. In patients having a positive post-operative outcome, at least 74% of the source maxima were within the resection. The median distance from the source maximum to the nearest intracranial electrode showing IED was 13.2, 15.6 and 15.6 mm for LSMAC, BEM and FEM, respectively. The study demonstrates that in clinical applications, the use of highly sophisticated and difficult to implement head models is not a crucial factor for an accurate ESI.

摘要

电源成像(ESI)旨在从头皮脑电图重建脑电活动。当应用于发作间期癫痫样放电(IED)时,该技术对于识别局灶性癫痫中的刺激区非常有用。头部电磁场传播建模(正向模型)中的不准确可能会强烈影响ESI,并导致IED发生器的定位错误。然而,尚未对大量已知病灶定位的患者进行关于所选头部模型对IED定位精度影响的系统研究。我们在此展示了对38例接受了高密度头皮脑电图、颅内脑电图检查且大多数患者随后接受了手术的癫痫患者数据集的不同头部模型的性能评估。我们比较了三种头部模型产生的ESI准确性:具有解剖学约束的局部球形模型(LSMAC)、边界元模型(BEM)和有限元模型(FEM)。所有模型均根据患者的个体磁共振成像计算得出,并且对平均IED进行了ESI。我们发现所有头部模型提供的源位置非常相似。在术后结果为阳性的患者中,至少74%的源最大值位于切除范围内。对于LSMAC、BEM和FEM,源最大值到显示IED的最近颅内电极的中位数距离分别为13.2、15.6和15.6毫米。该研究表明,在临床应用中,使用高度复杂且难以实施的头部模型并非准确进行ESI的关键因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ce8/4081973/8f0864b25c75/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验