• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

知识与运气。

Knowledge and luck.

作者信息

Turri John, Buckwalter Wesley, Blouw Peter

机构信息

Department of Philosophy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada,

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Apr;22(2):378-90. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0683-5.

DOI:10.3758/s13423-014-0683-5
PMID:25005164
Abstract

Nearly all success is due to some mix of ability and luck. But some successes we attribute to the agent's ability, whereas others we attribute to luck. To better understand the criteria distinguishing credit from luck, we conducted a series of four studies on knowledge attributions. Knowledge is an achievement that involves reaching the truth. But many factors affecting the truth are beyond our control, and reaching the truth is often partly due to luck. Which sorts of luck are compatible with knowledge? We found that knowledge attributions are highly sensitive to lucky events that change the explanation for why a belief is true. By contrast, knowledge attributions are surprisingly insensitive to lucky events that threaten, but ultimately fail to change the explanation for why a belief is true. These results shed light on our concept of knowledge, help explain apparent inconsistencies in prior work on knowledge attributions, and constitute progress toward a general understanding of the relation between success and luck.

摘要

几乎所有的成功都归因于能力和运气的某种结合。但有些成功我们归因于行动者的能力,而另一些我们归因于运气。为了更好地理解区分功劳与运气的标准,我们进行了一系列四项关于知识归因的研究。知识是一项涉及获取真理的成就。但许多影响真理的因素超出了我们的控制,获取真理往往部分归因于运气。哪些运气类型与知识相容呢?我们发现,知识归因对改变信念为真原因解释的幸运事件高度敏感。相比之下,知识归因对那些威胁但最终未能改变信念为真原因解释的幸运事件出奇地不敏感。这些结果揭示了我们的知识概念,有助于解释先前关于知识归因的工作中明显的不一致之处,并朝着对成功与运气之间关系的全面理解迈出了一步。

相似文献

1
Knowledge and luck.知识与运气。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Apr;22(2):378-90. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0683-5.
2
The folk conception of knowledge.知识的民间观念。
Cognition. 2012 Sep;124(3):272-83. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.05.017. Epub 2012 Jun 16.
3
Ability, luck, and looks: an evolutionary look at achievement ascriptions and the sexual attribution bias.能力、运气与外貌:从进化角度审视成就归因与性别归因偏差。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 May;92(5):775-88. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.5.775.
4
Performance and attributions to ability, effort, task, and luck of retarded adults after success or failure feedback.成功或失败反馈后智力迟钝成年人的表现以及对能力、努力、任务和运气的归因。
Am J Ment Defic. 1975 May;79(6):690-4.
5
Ability or luck: A systematic review of interpersonal attributions of success.能力还是运气:对成功的人际归因的系统评价
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 5;13:1035012. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1035012. eCollection 2022.
6
Depression and causal attributions for success and failure.抑郁与对成功和失败的因果归因。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1978 Mar;36(3):236-46. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.36.3.236.
7
"When something like a ladybug lands on you": Origins and development of the concept of luck.当像瓢虫这样的东西落在你身上时:运气概念的起源和发展。
Dev Psychol. 2020 Oct;56(10):1866-1878. doi: 10.1037/dev0001104. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
8
Causal attributions for losing as perceived by adolescents.青少年所感知到的失败的因果归因。
Adolescence. 1990 Spring;25(97):239-47.
9
Self-, ingroup, and outgroup achievement attributions of German and Turkish pupils.德国和土耳其学生的自我、内群体和外群体成就归因
J Soc Psychol. 1989 Aug;129(4):459-70. doi: 10.1080/00224545.1989.9712064.
10
Children's understanding of the implications of causal attributions for emotional experiences.儿童对因果归因对情感体验影响的理解。
Child Dev. 1988 Dec;59(6):1601-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1988.tb03687.x.

引用本文的文献

1
"Why me?": Qualitative research on why patients ask, what they mean, how they answer and what factors and processes are involved.“为什么是我?”:关于患者提问原因、问题含义、回答方式以及涉及哪些因素和过程的定性研究。
SSM Ment Health. 2023 Dec;3. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmmh.2023.100218. Epub 2023 May 4.
2
Are Gettier cases disturbing?盖梯尔问题令人不安吗?
Philos Stud. 2021;178(5):1503-1527. doi: 10.1007/s11098-020-01493-0. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
3
Kornblith versus Sosa on grades of knowledge.关于知识等级问题的科恩布利思与索萨之争。

本文引用的文献

1
Is probabilistic evidence a source of knowledge?概率性证据是知识的一个来源吗?
Cogn Sci. 2015 Jul;39(5):1062-80. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12182. Epub 2014 Oct 9.
2
Authentic Gettier cases: a reply to Starmans and Friedman.真实盖梯尔案例:对斯塔曼斯和弗里德曼的回应。
Cognition. 2013 Dec;129(3):666-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.08.016. Epub 2013 Sep 13.
3
Taking 'know' for an answer: a reply to Nagel, San Juan, and Mar.以“知道”为答案:对 Nagel、San Juan 和 Mar 的回应。
Synthese. 2019;196(12):4989-5007. doi: 10.1007/s11229-018-1689-8. Epub 2018 Jan 16.
Cognition. 2013 Dec;129(3):662-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.05.009. Epub 2013 Jun 10.
4
Lay denial of knowledge for justified true beliefs.对有正当理由的真信念进行否认知识的搁置。
Cognition. 2013 Dec;129(3):652-61. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.02.008. Epub 2013 Mar 11.
5
The folk conception of knowledge.知识的民间观念。
Cognition. 2012 Sep;124(3):272-83. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.05.017. Epub 2012 Jun 16.
6
Investigating the Neural and Cognitive Basis of Moral Luck: It's Not What You Do but What You Know.探究道德运气的神经和认知基础:关键不在于你做了什么,而在于你知道什么。
Rev Philos Psychol. 2010 Sep;1(3):333-349. doi: 10.1007/s13164-010-0027-y. Epub 2010 Mar 25.
7
On intuitional stability: the clear, the strong, and the paradigmatic.论直觉稳定性:清晰、有力和典范。
Cognition. 2010 Jun;115(3):491-503. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.02.003. Epub 2010 Mar 9.
8
G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.G*Power 3:一款适用于社会科学、行为科学和生物医学科学的灵活的统计功效分析程序。
Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146.
9
Judging mens rea: the tension between folk concepts and legal concepts of intentionality.判定犯罪意图:民间概念与故意的法律概念之间的紧张关系。
Behav Sci Law. 2003;21(5):563-80. doi: 10.1002/bsl.554.
10
Acquisition of the mental state verb know by 2- to 5-year-old children.2至5岁儿童对心理状态动词“知道”的习得
J Psycholinguist Res. 1997 Nov;26(6):581-603. doi: 10.1023/a:1025093906884.