Affiliations of authors: Supportive Care Medicine Department, Health Outcomes and Behavior Program, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL (KAD); Acute and Tertiary Care Department, University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, Pittsburgh, PA (HSD); Department of Medical Social Sciences and the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL (DC); Center for Patient Partnership, University of Wisconsin Law School, Madison, WI (MEG); Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA (RTP); Department of Reproductive Medicine, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, CA (SCP); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Summa Akron City Hospital, Akron, OH (VEvG); School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (DWB); Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC (BBR); Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA (LW).
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Jul 8;106(7). doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju128. Print 2014 Jul.
There is no consensus as to what symptoms or quality-of-life (QOL) domains should be measured as patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in ovarian cancer clinical trials. A panel of experts convened by the National Cancer Institute reviewed studies published between January 2000 and August 2011. The results were included in and combined with an expert consensus-building process to identify the most salient PROs for ovarian cancer clinical trials. We identified a set of PROs specific to ovarian cancer: abdominal pain, bloating, cramping, fear of recurrence/disease progression, indigestion, sexual dysfunction, vomiting, weight gain, and weight loss. Additional PROs identified in parallel with a group charged with identifying the most important PROs across cancer types were anorexia, cognitive problems, constipation, diarrhea, dyspnea, fatigue, nausea, neuropathy, pain, and insomnia. Physical and emotional domains were considered to be the most salient domains of QOL. Findings of the review and consensus process provide good support for use of these ovarian cancer-specific PROs in ovarian cancer clinical trials.
对于在卵巢癌临床试验中应该测量哪些症状或生活质量 (QOL) 领域作为患者报告的结果 (PRO),目前尚无共识。美国国立癌症研究所召集的一个专家组审查了 2000 年 1 月至 2011 年 8 月期间发表的研究。研究结果被纳入并结合专家共识制定过程,以确定卵巢癌临床试验中最显著的 PRO。我们确定了一组特定于卵巢癌的 PRO:腹痛、腹胀、痉挛、对复发/疾病进展的恐惧、消化不良、性功能障碍、呕吐、体重增加和体重减轻。与负责确定癌症类型中最重要的 PRO 的小组同时确定的其他 PRO 包括食欲不振、认知问题、便秘、腹泻、呼吸困难、疲劳、恶心、神经病变、疼痛和失眠。身体和情绪领域被认为是 QOL 最显著的领域。审查和共识过程的结果为在卵巢癌临床试验中使用这些卵巢癌特异性 PRO 提供了很好的支持。