Dholam Kanchan P, Gurav Sandeep, Dugad Jinesh, Banavli Shripad
Department of Dental and Prosthetics Surgery, Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol. 2014 Jan;35(1):36-9. doi: 10.4103/0971-5851.133717.
Treatment of acute leukemia's- a common childhood malignancy, involves intensive and powerful multi-drug chemotherapeutic regime. Oral lesions are a common complication in these patients affecting oral health status.
This study was conducted to evaluate and assess the oral health status of newly diagnosed leukemic pediatric patients during induction phase and its correlation to outcome of induction therapy.
Oral examinations was done in 33 children between the age group of 5-15 years with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and acute myloblastic leukemia (AML), who were undergoing chemotherapy. Oral Hygiene Index- Simplified, (OHI-S) decayed missing filled teeth index (def/DMFT), Loe and Sillness index for gingiva, and complete blood count at first and fourth week of induction phase were recorded for each patient. The changes in the oral health status were analyzed with Wilcoxon signed rank test.
During an induction phase it was observed that level of OHI-S (P = 0.002), Loe and Sillness index (P = 0.003), def/DMFT index (P = 0.076), platelet count (P = 0.00) increased significantly and no significant difference was noted in hemoglobin (P = 0.4) and total leucocytes count (P = 0.11).
It was observed that, although oral health status had significantly worsened, the induction outcome was not affected.
急性白血病是一种常见的儿童恶性肿瘤,其治疗涉及强化且强效的多药化疗方案。口腔病变是这些患者中影响口腔健康状况的常见并发症。
本研究旨在评估新诊断的白血病儿童患者在诱导期的口腔健康状况及其与诱导治疗结果的相关性。
对33名年龄在5至15岁之间、正在接受化疗的急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)和急性髓细胞白血病(AML)患儿进行口腔检查。记录每位患者在诱导期第一周和第四周的简化口腔卫生指数(OHI-S)、龋失补牙指数(def/DMFT)、牙龈的Loe和Sillness指数以及全血细胞计数。采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验分析口腔健康状况的变化。
在诱导期观察到,OHI-S水平(P = 0.002)、Loe和Sillness指数(P = 0.003)、def/DMFT指数(P = 0.076)、血小板计数(P = 0.00)显著增加,而血红蛋白(P = 0.4)和白细胞总数(P = 0.11)无显著差异。
观察到,尽管口腔健康状况显著恶化,但诱导治疗结果并未受到影响。