Beckman Mary E, Li Fangfang, Kong Eun Jong, Edwards Jan
Ohio State University.
University of Lethbridge.
Lab Phonol. 2014 Feb 1;5(1):151-194. doi: 10.1515/lp-2014-0007.
This paper examines whether data from a large cross-linguistic corpus of adult and child productions can be used to support an assumed corollary of the Neogrammarian distinction between two types of phonological change. The first type is regular sound change, which is assumed to be incremental and so should show continuity between phonological development and the age-related variation observed in the speech community undergoing the change. The second type is dialect borrowing, which could show an abrupt discontinuity between developmental patterns before and after the socio-historical circumstances that instigate it. We examine the acquisition of two contrasts: the Seoul Korean contrast between lax and aspirated stops which is undergoing regular sound change, and the standard Mandarin contrast between retroflex and dental sibilants which has been borrowed recently into the Sōngyuán dialect. Acquisition of the different contrasts patterns as predicted from the assumed differences between continuous regular sound change and potentially abrupt dialect borrowing. However, there are substantial gaps in our understanding both of the extent of cross-cultural variability in language socialization and of how this might affect the mechanisms of phonological change that must be addressed before we can fully understand the relationship between the time courses of the two.
本文探讨了来自大量成人和儿童语言产出的跨语言语料库的数据,是否可用于支持新语法学派关于两种语音变化类型区分的一个假定推论。第一种类型是规则音变,假定其具有渐进性,因此在语音发展与经历该变化的言语社区中观察到的与年龄相关的变异之间应呈现连续性。第二种类型是方言借用,在引发它的社会历史环境前后,其发展模式可能会出现突然的不连续性。我们研究了两种对立音的习得情况:正在经历规则音变的韩国首尔方言中松音和送气塞音的对立,以及最近借入松源方言的标准普通话中卷舌擦音和齿擦音的对立。正如从连续的规则音变和可能突然的方言借用之间的假定差异所预测的那样,出现了不同的对立模式习得情况。然而,在我们能够充分理解两者的时间进程之间的关系之前,我们对语言社会化中跨文化变异性的程度以及这可能如何影响语音变化机制的理解存在很大差距,这些差距必须加以解决。