• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Speakers of tonal and non-tonal Korean dialects use different cue weightings in the perception of the three-way laryngeal stop contrast.有声调与无声调的韩语方言使用者在感知三元喉塞音对比时使用不同的线索权重。
J Phon. 2013 Mar;41(2):117-132. doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2012.12.002.
2
Effects of Sound Change on the Weighting of Acoustic Cues to the Three-Way Laryngeal Stop Contrast in Korean: Diachronic and Dialectal Comparisons.语音变化对韩语中喉塞音三元对立的声学线索权重的影响:历时与方言比较
Lang Speech. 2019 Sep;62(3):509-530. doi: 10.1177/0023830918786305. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
3
The influence of inter-dialect contact on the Korean three-way laryngeal distinction: An acoustic comparison among Seoul Korean speakers and Gyeongsang speakers with limited and extended residence in Seoul.方言接触对韩国三声区别的影响:在首尔居住时间有限和居住时间较长的首尔韩国人和庆尚韩国人之间的声学比较。
Lang Speech. 2022 Sep;65(3):531-553. doi: 10.1177/00238309211037720. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
4
Cross-generational acoustic comparisons of tonal Kyungsang Korean stops.庆尚道韩语声调塞音的跨代声学比较。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2020 Aug;148(2):EL172. doi: 10.1121/10.0001757.
5
An apparent-time study of an ongoing sound change in Seoul Korean: A prosodic account.首尔韩语中正在进行的音变的显性时间研究:韵律解释。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 22;15(10):e0240682. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240682. eCollection 2020.
6
Attentional Modulation and Individual Differences in Explaining the Changing Role of Fundamental Frequency in Korean Laryngeal Stop Perception.注意调节与个体差异:解释基频在韩语喉塞音感知中不断变化的作用
Lang Speech. 2018 Sep;61(3):384-408. doi: 10.1177/0023830917729840. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
7
Korean-speaking children's perceptual development in multidimensional acoustic space.韩语儿童在多维声空中的感知发展。
J Child Lang. 2020 May;47(3):579-599. doi: 10.1017/S0305000919000692. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
8
Individual Differences in Categorical Judgment of L2 Stops: A Link to Proficiency and Acoustic Cue-Weighting.个体差异在二语塞音范畴判断中的体现:与熟练度和声学线索赋权的关系。
Lang Speech. 2023 Jun;66(2):354-380. doi: 10.1177/00238309221108647. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
9
Perception and production of English stops by tonal and non-tonal Korean dialect speakers.说有声调和无声调韩语方言的人对英语塞音的感知与产出
J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Dec;134(6):EL541. doi: 10.1121/1.4829059.
10
Individual differences in phonetic cue use in production and perception of a non-native sound contrast.在非母语语音对比的产出与感知中语音线索使用的个体差异。
J Phon. 2015 Sep 1;52:183-204. doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2015.07.003.

引用本文的文献

1
The f0 perturbation effects in focus marking: Evidence from Korean and Japanese.焦点标记中的 f0 干扰效应:来自韩语和日语的证据。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 23;18(3):e0283139. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283139. eCollection 2023.
2
An apparent-time study of an ongoing sound change in Seoul Korean: A prosodic account.首尔韩语中正在进行的音变的显性时间研究:韵律解释。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 22;15(10):e0240682. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240682. eCollection 2020.
3
Individual differences in phonetic cue use in production and perception of a non-native sound contrast.在非母语语音对比的产出与感知中语音线索使用的个体差异。
J Phon. 2015 Sep 1;52:183-204. doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2015.07.003.

本文引用的文献

1
Clear speech production of Korean stops: changing phonetic targets and enhancement strategies.韩语塞音的清晰语音产出:改变语音目标与强化策略
J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Dec;124(6):3909-17. doi: 10.1121/1.2988292.
2
Is fundamental frequency a cue to aspiration in initial stops?基频是否是初始塞音中送气的一个线索?
J Acoust Soc Am. 2006 Nov;120(5 Pt 1):2884-95. doi: 10.1121/1.2346131.
3
Effects of language experience and stimulus complexity on the categorical perception of pitch direction.语言经验和刺激复杂性对音高方向分类感知的影响。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2006 Aug;120(2):1063-74. doi: 10.1121/1.2213572.
4
Selective attention and the acquisition of new phonetic categories.选择性注意与新语音类别的习得
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2002 Apr;28(2):349-66. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.28.2.349.
5
A study of sentence stress production in Mandarin speakers of American English.一项关于说美式英语的普通话使用者句子重音产生的研究。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2001 Apr;109(4):1681-90. doi: 10.1121/1.1356023.
6
FO gives voicing information even with unambiguous voice onset times.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1993 Apr;93(4 Pt 1):2152-9. doi: 10.1121/1.406678.
7
Phonetic trading relations and context effects: new experimental evidence for a speech mode of perception.语音交易关系与语境效应:语音感知模式的新实验证据
Psychol Bull. 1982 Jul;92(1):81-110.
8
Cross-language study of perception of the oral-nasal distinction.口腔-鼻腔差异感知的跨语言研究。
J Acoust Soc Am. 1982 Jun;71(6):1551-61. doi: 10.1121/1.387809.
9
Trading relations in speech and nonspeech.言语与非言语中的交易关系。
Percept Psychophys. 1986 Feb;39(2):129-42. doi: 10.3758/bf03211495.
10
"Voicing" in English: a catalogue of acoustic features signaling /b/ versus /p/ in trochees.
Lang Speech. 1986 Jan-Mar;29 ( Pt 1):3-11. doi: 10.1177/002383098602900102.

有声调与无声调的韩语方言使用者在感知三元喉塞音对比时使用不同的线索权重。

Speakers of tonal and non-tonal Korean dialects use different cue weightings in the perception of the three-way laryngeal stop contrast.

作者信息

Lee Hyunjung, Politzer-Ahles Stephen, Jongman Allard

机构信息

University of Kansas.

出版信息

J Phon. 2013 Mar;41(2):117-132. doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2012.12.002.

DOI:10.1016/j.wocn.2012.12.002
PMID:25301975
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4188348/
Abstract

The current study investigated the perception of the three-way distinction among Korean voiceless stops in non-tonal Seoul and tonal Kyungsang Korean. The question addressed is whether listeners from these two dialects differ in the way they perceive the three stops. Forty-two Korean listeners (21 each from Seoul and South Kyungsang) were tested in a perception experiment with stimuli in which VOT and F0 were systematically manipulated. Analyses of the perceptual identification functions show that VOT and F0 cues trade off each other for the perception of the three stops. However, the trading relationship differs between the two dialects. Logistic regression analyses confirmed the two dialects use the perceptual cues differently for the lenis and aspirated stops. While Seoul listeners rely primarily on F0 for making lenis responses and on VOT and F0 for aspirated responses, F0 plays a less important role in modulating both lenis and aspirated responses for Kyungsang than for Seoul listeners. It is proposed that different tonal systems between the two dialects and the ongoing diachronic sound change in the stops of Seoul Korean contribute to the inter-dialect difference in cue weighting for the three-way stop distinction. The results suggest that although the difference in phonology between the two dialects influences the phonetic realization, the phonetic trade-off among multiple cues allows each dialect to maintain the phonemic distinction in a unique way.

摘要

本研究调查了首尔非声调韩语和庆尚声调韩语中韩语清塞音的三分区别的感知情况。所探讨的问题是,来自这两种方言的听者在感知这三个塞音的方式上是否存在差异。42名韩语听者(首尔和庆尚南部分别为21名)参与了一项感知实验,实验中的刺激音在声门起始时间(VOT)和基频(F0)方面进行了系统的操控。对感知识别函数的分析表明,在感知这三个塞音时,VOT和F0线索相互权衡。然而,两种方言之间的权衡关系有所不同。逻辑回归分析证实,两种方言在送气音和松音的感知线索使用上存在差异。首尔听者在做出松音反应时主要依赖F0,在做出送气音反应时依赖VOT和F0,而对于庆尚听者来说,F0在调节松音和送气音反应方面所起的作用比首尔听者小。研究提出,两种方言不同的声调系统以及首尔韩语塞音正在发生的历时性语音变化,导致了在三分塞音区别的线索权重方面存在方言间差异。研究结果表明,尽管两种方言在音系学上的差异影响了语音实现,但多个线索之间的语音权衡使得每种方言都能以独特的方式维持音位区别。