Shin Joo Youn, Byeon Suk Ho, Kwon Oh Woong
The Institute of Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 134 Shinchon-Dong, Seodaemun-Gu, Seoul, Korea, 120-752.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2015 Apr;253(4):527-35. doi: 10.1007/s00417-014-2729-9. Epub 2014 Jul 15.
To compare the anatomic and functional results between optical coherence tomography (OCT)-guided selective focal laser photocoagulation (OCT-laser) and conventional modified Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (mETDRS) laser treatment for diabetic macular edema (DME).
We analyzed treatment outcomes in 47 consecutive eyes treated with OCT-laser compared to 31 matched eyes treated with mETDRS. In the OCT-laser group, we identified 'significant actively-leaking microaneurysms on OCT' (SALMO) which are responsible for edema in OCT B-scan images, and thoroughly ablated them with photocoagulation. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and retinal thickness by OCT were compared at baseline and 12 months after treatment between two groups.
OCT-laser treatment resulted in significant improvements in BCVA, central subfield thickness (CST), and maximum retinal thickness (MRT) from baseline at 12 months from the time of therapy (+2.5 letter score, p = 0.04; -45.56 μm in CST, p < 0.001; -91.6 μm in MRT, p < 0.001). The mean number of treated 'SALMO' was 5.6 ± 4.0 (range 1-26), while the number of MAs in 'treatable lesions' by fluorescein angiography (FA) in the same eye was 16.3 ± 11.8 (range 2-42). There was no difference between OCT-laser and mETDRS groups in changes of these parameters from baseline at 12 months (p = 0.56, p = 0.89, p = 0.43 respectively). Fundus autofluorescence (FAF) and OCT revealed less tissue damage in OCT-laser-treated eyes, compared to eyes treated with mETDRS (p < 0.001).
OCT-laser shows similar anatomic and functional outcomes compared to conventional laser (modified ETDRS), with significantly less retinal damages.
比较光学相干断层扫描(OCT)引导下的选择性局灶性激光光凝术(OCT激光)与传统改良早期糖尿病性视网膜病变研究(mETDRS)激光治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)的解剖学和功能结果。
我们分析了47只连续接受OCT激光治疗的眼睛与31只匹配的接受mETDRS治疗的眼睛的治疗结果。在OCT激光组中,我们在OCT B扫描图像中识别出导致水肿的“OCT上显著的活动性渗漏微动脉瘤”(SALMO),并用光凝术将其彻底消融。比较两组在基线时和治疗后12个月时的最佳矫正视力(BCVA)和OCT测量的视网膜厚度。
OCT激光治疗导致治疗后12个月时BCVA、中心子野厚度(CST)和最大视网膜厚度(MRT)较基线时有显著改善(BCVA提高2.5个字母评分,p = 0.04;CST减少45.56μm,p < 0.001;MRT减少91.6μm,p < 0.001)。治疗的“SALMO”平均数量为5.6±4.0(范围1 - 26),而同一眼中荧光素血管造影(FA)显示的“可治疗病变”中的微动脉瘤数量为16.3±11.8(范围2 - 42)。OCT激光组和mETDRS组在治疗后12个月时这些参数相对于基线的变化没有差异(分别为p = 0.56、p = 0.89、p = 0.43)。与接受mETDRS治疗的眼睛相比,眼底自发荧光(FAF)和OCT显示OCT激光治疗的眼睛组织损伤更少(p < 0.001)。
与传统激光(改良ETDRS)相比,OCT激光显示出相似的解剖学和功能结果,视网膜损伤明显更少。