The King's Fund, 11-13 Cavendish Square, London, W1G 0AN, UK.
The Mental Health Foundation, Sea Containers House, 20 Upper Ground, London, SE1 9QB, UK.
Int J Integr Care. 2010 Mar 31;10:e040. doi: 10.5334/ijic.516. eCollection 2010 Jan.
This policy paper considers what the long-term conditions policies in England and other countries could learn from the experience of the Care Programme Approach (CPA). The CPA was introduced in England in April 1991 as the statutory framework for people requiring support in the community for more severe and enduring mental health problems. The CPA approach is an example of a long-standing 'care co-ordination' model that seeks to develop individualised care plans and then attempt to integrate care for patients from a range of providers.
The CPA experience is highly relevant to both the English and international debates on the future of long-term conditions management where the agenda has focused on developing co-ordinated care planning and delivery between health and social care; to prioritise upstream interventions that promote health and wellbeing; and to provide for a more personalised service.
This review of the CPA experience suggests that there is the potential for better care integration for those patients with multiple or complex needs where a strategy of personalised care planning and pro-active care co-ordination is provided. However, such models will not reach their full potential unless a number of preconditions are met including: clear eligibility criteria; standardised measures of service quality; a mix of governance and incentives to hold providers accountable for such quality; and genuine patient involvement in their own care plans.
Investment and professional support to the role of the care co-ordinator is particularly crucial. Care co-ordinators require the requisite skills and competencies to act as a care professional to the patient as well as to have the power to exert authority among other care professionals to ensure multidisciplinary care plans are implemented successfully. Attention to inter-professional practice, culture, leadership and organisational development can also help crowd-in behaviours that promote integrated care.
本文探讨了英格兰及其他国家的长期护理政策可以从关怀计划方法(CPA)的经验中学到什么。CPA 于 1991 年 4 月在英格兰推出,作为在社区中为严重和持久精神健康问题提供支持的人提供支持的法定框架。CPA 方法是一种长期存在的“护理协调”模式的例子,旨在制定个性化护理计划,然后尝试整合来自各种提供者的患者护理。
CPA 的经验与英格兰和国际上关于长期护理管理未来的辩论高度相关,该议程的重点是制定卫生和社会保健之间协调的护理计划和交付;优先考虑促进健康和福祉的上游干预措施;并提供更个性化的服务。
对 CPA 经验的审查表明,对于那些有多种或复杂需求的患者,有潜力实现更好的护理整合,提供个性化的护理计划和积极的护理协调策略。然而,除非满足一些前提条件,否则这些模式将无法发挥其全部潜力,包括:明确的资格标准;服务质量的标准化衡量标准;治理和激励措施的混合,以要求提供者对这种质量负责;以及患者真正参与自己的护理计划。
对护理协调员角色的投资和专业支持尤为重要。护理协调员需要必要的技能和能力,既要作为护理专业人员为患者服务,又要拥有在其他护理专业人员中行使权威的权力,以确保多学科护理计划的成功实施。关注专业间实践、文化、领导力和组织发展也可以帮助促进综合护理的行为。