Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit (ICR-CTSU), The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, UK.
Eur J Cancer. 2014 Sep;50(14):2375-89. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.06.007. Epub 2014 Jul 24.
The TACT trial (CRUK/01/001) compared adjuvant sequential FEC-docetaxel (FEC-D) chemotherapy with standard anthracycline-based chemotherapy of similar duration in women with early breast cancer. Results at a median of 5 years suggested no improvement in disease-free survival with FEC-D. Given differing toxicity profiles of the regimens, the impact on quality of life (QL) was explored.
Patients from 44 centres completed standardised QL questionnaires before chemotherapy, after cycles 4 and 8, at 9, 12, 18 and 24 months and at 6 years follow-up. Patient diaries assessed frequency, associated distress and impact on daily activity of 15 treatment related side effects.
830 patients (415 FEC-D; 415 controls) contributed assessments during 0-24 months; 362 of whom participated again at 6 years. During chemotherapy, FEC-D impaired global health/QL and depression rates and significantly more QL domains than standard regimens. Novel diary card ratings highlighted significantly more distress and interference with daily activities due to FEC-D side effects compared with standard treatment. In both groups, most QL parameters returned to baseline levels by 2 years and were unchanged at 6 years.
Within expected negative effects of chemotherapy on wide ranging QL domains FEC-D patients reported greater toxicity, disruption and distress during treatment with no improvement in disease outcome at 5 years than patients receiving standard anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Findings should inform future patients of relative costs and benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy.
TACT 试验(CRUK/01/001)比较了早期乳腺癌患者辅助序贯 FEC-多西他赛(FEC-D)化疗与标准蒽环类药物化疗的疗效,后者的化疗时间相似。中位随访 5 年的结果表明,FEC-D 并未改善无病生存率。鉴于两种方案的毒性谱不同,本研究探索了其对生活质量(QL)的影响。
来自 44 个中心的患者在化疗前、第 4 和第 8 周期后、第 9、12、18 和 24 个月以及 6 年随访时完成了标准化的 QL 问卷。患者日记评估了 15 种与治疗相关的副作用的发生频率、相关痛苦和对日常活动的影响。
830 例患者(FEC-D 组 415 例,对照组 415 例)在 0-24 个月期间提供了评估结果;其中 362 例患者在 6 年后再次参与。化疗期间,FEC-D 组患者的总体健康/QL 和抑郁评分均较标准方案组受损,QL 评分的多个维度也显著更差。新的日记卡评分强调,与标准治疗相比,FEC-D 组患者因副作用而导致的痛苦和对日常活动的干扰明显更多。在两组患者中,大多数 QL 参数在 2 年内恢复到基线水平,6 年后无变化。
在化疗对广泛的 QL 领域产生的预期负面影响内,FEC-D 组患者报告在治疗期间毒性更大、干扰更多、痛苦更甚,而在 5 年时疾病结局并未改善,优于接受标准蒽环类药物化疗的患者。研究结果应使未来的患者了解辅助化疗的相对成本和获益。