Goodreau Steven M, Carnegie Nicole B, Vittinghoff Eric, Lama Javier R, Fuchs Jonathan D, Sanchez Jorge, Buchbinder Susan P
University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 30;9(7):e102960. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102960. eCollection 2014.
Three trials have demonstrated the prophylactic effect of male circumcision (MC) for HIV acquisition among heterosexuals, and MC interventions are underway throughout sub-Saharan Africa. Similar efforts for men who have sex with men (MSM) are stymied by the potential for circumcised MSM to acquire HIV easily through receptive sex and transmit easily through insertive sex. Existing work suggests that MC for MSM should reach its maximum potential in settings where sexual role segregation is historically high and relatively stable across the lifecourse; HIV incidence among MSM is high; reported willingness for prophylactic circumcision is high; and pre-existing circumcision rates are low. We aim to identify the likely public health impact that MC interventions among MSM would have in one setting that fulfills these conditions-Peru-as a theoretical upper bound for their effectiveness among MSM generally.
We use a dynamic, stochastic sexual network model based in exponential-family random graph modeling and parameterized from multiple behavioral surveys of Peruvian MSM. We consider three enrollment criteria (insertive during 100%, >80% or >60% of UAI) and two levels of uptake (25% and 50% of eligible men); we explore sexual role proportions from two studies and different frequencies of switching among role categories. Each scenario is simulated 10 times. We estimate that efficiency could reach one case averted per 6 circumcisions. However, the population-level impact of an optimistic MSM-MC intervention in this setting would likely be at most ∼5-10% incidence and prevalence reductions over 25 years.
Roll-out of MC for MSM in Peru would not result in a substantial reduction in new HIV infections, despite characteristics in this population that could maximize such effects. Additional studies are needed to confirm these results for other MSM populations, and providers may consider the individual health benefits of offering MC to their MSM patients.
三项试验已证明男性包皮环切术(MC)对异性恋者感染艾滋病毒具有预防作用,撒哈拉以南非洲各地正在开展MC干预措施。针对男男性行为者(MSM)的类似努力却受到阻碍,因为接受包皮环切术的男男性行为者有可能通过被动性行为轻易感染艾滋病毒,并通过插入性行为轻易传播病毒。现有研究表明,在性角色隔离在历史上较高且在整个生命历程中相对稳定的环境中,针对男男性行为者的包皮环切术应能发挥其最大潜力;男男性行为者中的艾滋病毒发病率较高;报告的预防性包皮环切术意愿较高;且既往包皮环切率较低。我们旨在确定在满足这些条件的一个环境——秘鲁——中,针对男男性行为者的包皮环切术干预措施可能产生的公共卫生影响,以此作为其对一般男男性行为者有效性的理论上限。
我们使用基于指数族随机图模型的动态随机性行为网络模型,并根据对秘鲁男男性行为者的多项行为调查进行参数化。我们考虑了三种纳入标准(在100%、>80%或>60%的肛交插入行为期间)和两种接受率水平(符合条件男性的25%和50%);我们探讨了两项研究中的性角色比例以及不同角色类别之间的转换频率。每个场景模拟10次。我们估计,每进行6次包皮环切术可能预防1例感染。然而,在这种环境下,乐观的男男性行为者包皮环切术干预措施对人群层面的影响可能在25年内最多使发病率和患病率降低约5 - 10%。
在秘鲁,尽管该人群具有可能使此类效果最大化的特征,但为男男性行为者开展包皮环切术并不会导致新感染艾滋病毒病例大幅减少。需要进一步研究以证实其他男男性行为者群体的这些结果,并且医疗服务提供者可考虑为其男男性行为者患者提供包皮环切术对个体健康的益处。