Chor Ka Ho Brian, Olin Su-Chin Serene, Weaver Jamie, Cleek Andrew F, McKay Mary M, Hoagwood Kimberly E, Horwitz Sarah M
Dr. Chor is with the American Institutes for Research, Chicago (e-mail:
Psychiatr Serv. 2014 Dec 1;65(12):1439-44. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201300535. Epub 2014 Oct 31.
This study prospectively examined the naturalistic adoption of clinical and business evidence-informed training by all 346 outpatient mental health clinics licensed to treat children, adolescents, and their families in New York State.
The study used attendance data (September 2011-August 2013) from the Clinic Technical Assistance Center, a training, consultation, and educational center funded by the state Office of Mental Health, to classify the clinics' adoption of 33 trainings. Adoption behavior was classified by number, type, and intensity of trainings. The clinics were classified into four adopter groups reflecting the highest training intensity in which they participated (low, medium, and high adopters and "super-adopters").
A total of 268 clinics adopted trainings (median=5); business and clinical trainings were about equally accessed (82% versus 78%). Participation was highest for hour-long Webinars (96%) followed by learning collaboratives, which take six to 18 months to complete (34%). Most (73%-94%) adopters of business learning collaboratives and all adopters of clinical learning collaboratives had previously sampled a Webinar, although maintaining participation in learning collaboratives was a challenge. The adopter groups captured meaningful adopter profiles: 41% of clinics were low adopters that selected fewer trainings and participated only in Webinars, and 34% were high or super-adopters that accessed more trainings and participated in at least one learning collaborative.
More nuanced definitions of adoption behavior can improve the understanding of clinic adoption of training and hence promote the development of efficient rollout strategies by state systems.
本研究前瞻性地考察了纽约州346家获得许可为儿童、青少年及其家庭提供门诊心理健康治疗的诊所对临床和商业循证培训的自然采用情况。
该研究使用了临床技术援助中心(一个由州心理健康办公室资助的培训、咨询和教育中心)2011年9月至2013年8月的出勤数据,对诊所对33项培训的采用情况进行分类。采用行为根据培训的数量、类型和强度进行分类。诊所被分为四个采用者组,反映其参与的最高培训强度(低采用者、中等采用者、高采用者和“超级采用者”)。
共有268家诊所采用了培训(中位数=5);商业培训和临床培训的采用情况大致相同(分别为82%和78%)。一小时的网络研讨会参与度最高(96%),其次是学习协作项目,完成时间为6至18个月(34%)。大多数商业学习协作项目的采用者(73%-94%)和所有临床学习协作项目的采用者此前都参加过网络研讨会,不过维持学习协作项目的参与度是一项挑战。采用者组呈现出有意义的采用者特征:41%的诊所是低采用者,选择的培训较少,仅参加网络研讨会;34%是高采用者或超级采用者,参加的培训更多,且至少参加了一个学习协作项目。
对采用行为进行更细致入微的定义,可以增进对诊所培训采用情况的理解,从而促进州系统制定高效的推广策略。