de Quadros Ronice Müller, Cruz Carina Rebello, Pizzio Aline Lemos
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina - UFSC.
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina - UFSC e Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS.
Rev Virtual Estud Ling. 2012;10(19):185-212.
This study compared the performance in phonological memory tasks of bimodal bilíngual hearing children (children of deaf parents) and deaf children with cochlear implant (children of deaf parents and hearing parents), with different contexts of access to Brazilian Sign Language (Libras). We used two tests: Portuguêse Pseudowords (Santos and Bueno, 2003) and Libras Pseudosigns (developed by researchers from Development Bimodal Bilíngual Project). Moreover, we included two control groups, one of deaf children, growing up with Libras, with deaf parents, and the other of hearing adults Codas, bimodal bilínguals, with deaf parents. In the analysis of the results, initially, in regard to the performance among the groups tested, it was found that the bimodal bilíngual children had higher scores in both tests. However, when we analyzed the performance of the deaf child with cochlear implant, with deaf parents, with full access to sign language, compared to the other children with cochlear implant, with restricted access to Libras, we found that this child has a similar performance to the Coda children. The cochlear-implanted children with restricted access to Libras, therefore with more access to Portuguêse, had lower scores in both tests, being the worst score for the Portuguêse test. The results shown that children with cochlear implant can have benefits when they have access to Libras, having similar performances to hearing bimodal bilíngual children.
本研究比较了双语双模式听力儿童(聋人父母的孩子)和接受人工耳蜗植入的聋儿(聋人父母和听力正常父母的孩子)在语音记忆任务中的表现,这些孩子接触巴西手语(Libras)的背景不同。我们使用了两项测试:葡萄牙语伪词测试(桑托斯和布埃诺,2003年)和Libras伪手势测试(由双模式双语发展项目的研究人员开发)。此外,我们纳入了两个对照组,一组是与聋人父母一起使用Libras成长的聋儿,另一组是有聋人父母的听力正常的双模式双语成人(Codas)。在结果分析中,最初,关于测试组之间的表现,发现双模式双语儿童在两项测试中得分更高。然而,当我们分析接受人工耳蜗植入、有聋人父母且能充分接触手语的聋儿与其他接受人工耳蜗植入但接触Libras受限的儿童的表现时,我们发现这个孩子的表现与Codas儿童相似。因此,接触Libras受限、更多接触葡萄牙语的接受人工耳蜗植入的儿童在两项测试中得分较低,葡萄牙语测试得分最差。结果表明,接受人工耳蜗植入的儿童在接触Libras时可能会受益,其表现与听力双模式双语儿童相似。