Suppr超能文献

高度交联聚乙烯可改善取出的髋臼内衬的磨损情况,但不能改善表面损伤。

Highly crosslinked polyethylene improves wear but not surface damage in retrieved acetabular liners.

作者信息

Pang Hee-Nee, Naudie Douglas D R, McCalden Richard W, MacDonald Steven J, Teeter Matthew G

机构信息

Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, London Health Sciences Centre, University Hospital, 339 Windemere Road, London, ON, N6A 5A5, Canada.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Feb;473(2):463-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3858-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Highly crosslinked polyethylene (XLPE) is believed to demonstrate better wear resistance than conventional polyethylene (CPE) in total hip arthroplasty.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purpose of this study was to compare visual damage scores and micro-CT measurements of penetration, a surrogate for wear, between matched retrieved XLPE and CPE acetabular liners.

METHODS

Thirteen XLPE acetabular liners were matched in terms of implant design (all were of the same design), patient age, sex, liner dimensions, duration of implantation, and reason for revision to a group of CPE liners that were retrieved in the same time period. Penetration resulting from the combination of wear and creep in the two groups of liners was measured with micro-CT. Surface damage was scored by two blinded observers using a surface damage system that considers the seven common damage modes: pitting, scratching, burnishing, abrasions, impingement, embedded debris, and delamination, and wear patterns were documented.

RESULTS

There was no difference (p=0.32) in total damage score between the XLPE group (14±4) and the CPE group (15±5). However, there was three times greater penetration (odds ratio, 3.1; confidence interval, 2.3-5.1; p<0.001) in the CPE group (0.18±0.09 mm/year) than in the XLPE group (0.05±0.07 mm/year). There was less volumetric loss in XLPE (82±SD 134 mm3) versus the CPE group (350±SD 342 mm3; p=0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

XLPE liners undergo less penetration as a result of creep and wear than CPE liners based on quantitative measurements provided by micro-CT, which was not apparent using damage scoring alone. This demonstrates the use of three-dimensional imaging techniques such as micro-CT for quantifying wear in retrieval studies.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

In this study, XLPE had less wear but similar damage scores than CPE, allaying concerns that the beneficial wear properties of XLPE might come with a tradeoff arising from the increased brittleness of that material.

摘要

背景

在全髋关节置换术中,高度交联聚乙烯(XLPE)被认为比传统聚乙烯(CPE)具有更好的耐磨性。

问题/目的:本研究的目的是比较配对取出的XLPE和CPE髋臼衬垫的视觉损伤评分以及磨损替代指标——穿透的微观CT测量结果。

方法

根据植入物设计(均为相同设计)、患者年龄、性别、衬垫尺寸、植入时间以及翻修原因,将13个XLPE髋臼衬垫与同期取出的一组CPE衬垫进行配对。使用微观CT测量两组衬垫因磨损和蠕变共同作用导致的穿透情况。由两名不知情的观察者使用一种表面损伤系统对表面损伤进行评分,该系统考虑了七种常见损伤模式:点蚀、划痕、抛光、磨损、撞击、嵌入碎片和分层,并记录磨损模式。

结果

XLPE组(14±4)和CPE组(15±5)的总损伤评分无差异(p = 0.32)。然而,CPE组(0.18±0.09 mm/年)的穿透率比XLPE组(0.05±0.07 mm/年)高两倍(优势比,3.1;置信区间,2.3 - 5.1;p < 0.001)。与CPE组(350±标准差342 mm³;p = 0.017)相比,XLPE的体积损失更少(82±标准差134 mm³)。

结论

基于微观CT提供的定量测量结果,XLPE衬垫因蠕变和磨损导致的穿透比CPE衬垫少,仅使用损伤评分时这并不明显。这证明了在翻修研究中使用微观CT等三维成像技术来量化磨损。

临床意义

在本研究中,XLPE的磨损比CPE少,但损伤评分相似,消除了对XLPE有益的磨损特性可能因其材料脆性增加而产生权衡的担忧。

相似文献

1
Highly crosslinked polyethylene improves wear but not surface damage in retrieved acetabular liners.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Feb;473(2):463-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3858-5.
2
Backside Wear Is Not Dependent on the Acetabular Socket Design in Crosslinked Polyethylene Liners.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Feb;474(2):374-82. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4471-y.
4
Impingement testing of total hip replacements according to ASTM F2582 - Implant wear, resistance to damage and acceptance criteria.
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2024 Feb;150:106270. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.106270. Epub 2023 Nov 26.
7
Polyethylene Wear Increases in Liners Articulating With Scratched Oxidized Zirconium Femoral Heads.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Feb;476(2):182-192. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000040.
10
Surface Damage Is Not Reduced With Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene Tibial Inserts at Short-term.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Jan;474(1):107-16. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4344-4.

引用本文的文献

3
Risk factors for liner wear and head migration in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 20;13(1):15612. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-42809-4.
4
A geometric assessment method for estimating dimensional change of retrieved dual mobility liners for total hip arthroplasty.
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2023 Jun;237(6):782-787. doi: 10.1177/09544119231176112. Epub 2023 May 24.
5
Failure of a Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene Liner After Spine Fusion.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2023 Mar 20;7(3). doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-22-00150. eCollection 2023 Mar 1.
6
Ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) for hip and knee arthroplasty: The present and the future.
J Orthop. 2021 Apr 23;25:98-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2021.04.004. eCollection 2021 May-Jun.
7
[Tribology in hip arthroplasty : Benefits of different materials].
Orthopade. 2021 Apr;50(4):259-269. doi: 10.1007/s00132-021-04077-w. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
8
Comparative Biomechanical Study of Crosslinked Polyethylene Wear with 36-mm Ceramic Femoral Heads and with 32-mm Metal Femoral Heads.
Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2020 Oct;55(5):597-604. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1708518. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
9
Are Hooded, Crosslinked Polyethylene Liners Associated with a Reduced Risk of Revision After THA?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Jun;477(6):1315-1321. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000710.
10
Low failure rate at short term for 40 mm heads and second generation triple annealed HCLPE liners in hybrid hip replacements.
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2019 Mar-Apr;10(2):350-357. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2017.12.008. Epub 2018 Jan 3.

本文引用的文献

2
The 2012 Mark Coventry award: a retrieval analysis of high flexion versus posterior-stabilized tibial inserts.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Jan;471(1):56-63. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2387-3.
3
Highly cross-linked vs conventional polyethylene: no differences in rim notching from micromotion on retrieved acetabular liners.
J Arthroplasty. 2012 Oct;27(9):1616-1621.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.03.034. Epub 2012 May 17.
4
6
History and systematic review of wear and osteolysis outcomes for first-generation highly crosslinked polyethylene.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Aug;469(8):2262-77. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-1872-4.
7
Retrieved highly crosslinked UHMWPE acetabular liners have similar wear damage as conventional UHMWPE.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Feb;469(2):387-94. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1552-9.
8
The incidence of acetabular osteolysis in young patients with conventional versus highly crosslinked polyethylene.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Feb;469(2):372-81. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1518-y.
9
Highly cross-linked polyethylene acetabular liners retrieved four to five years after revision surgery: a report of two cases.
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2010 Aug;3(6):464-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2010.04.002. Epub 2010 Apr 27.
10
Three-dimensional surface deviation maps for analysis of retrieved polyethylene acetabular liners using micro-computed tomography.
J Arthroplasty. 2010 Feb;25(2):330-2. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.11.001. Epub 2009 Dec 21.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验