Suppr超能文献

工作狂的患病率:一项对挪威员工具有全国代表性样本的调查研究。

The prevalence of workaholism: a survey study in a nationally representative sample of Norwegian employees.

作者信息

Andreassen Cecilie Schou, Griffiths Mark D, Hetland Jørn, Kravina Luca, Jensen Fredrik, Pallesen Ståle

机构信息

Department of Psychosocial Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway; The Competence Center, Bergen Clinics Foundation, Bergen, Norway.

Psychology Division, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2014 Aug 13;9(8):e102446. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102446. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

Workaholism has become an increasingly popular area for empirical study. However, most studies examining the prevalence of workaholism have used non-representative samples and measures with poorly defined cut-off scores. To overcome these methodological limitations, a nationally representative survey among employees in Norway (N = 1,124) was conducted. Questions relating to gender, age, marital status, caretaker responsibility for children, percentage of full-time equivalent, and educational level were asked. Workaholism was assessed by the use of a psychometrically validated instrument (i.e., Bergen Work Addiction Scale). Personality was assessed using the Mini-International Personality Item Pool. Results showed that the prevalence of workaholism was 8.3% (95% CI  = 6.7-9.9%). An adjusted logistic regression analysis showed that workaholism was negatively related to age and positively related to the personality dimensions agreeableness, neuroticism, and intellect/imagination. Implications for these findings are discussed.

摘要

工作狂已成为实证研究中一个越来越热门的领域。然而,大多数考察工作狂患病率的研究使用的是非代表性样本以及截断分数定义不佳的测量方法。为克服这些方法上的局限性,在挪威对员工进行了一项具有全国代表性的调查(N = 1,124)。询问了有关性别、年龄、婚姻状况、对子女的照料责任、全职等效百分比以及教育水平的问题。通过使用一种经过心理测量学验证的工具(即卑尔根工作成瘾量表)来评估工作狂情况。使用迷你国际人格项目池来评估人格。结果显示,工作狂的患病率为8.3%(95%置信区间 = 6.7 - 9.9%)。经调整的逻辑回归分析表明,工作狂与年龄呈负相关,与宜人性、神经质和智力/想象力等人格维度呈正相关。讨论了这些发现的意义。

相似文献

1
The prevalence of workaholism: a survey study in a nationally representative sample of Norwegian employees.
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 13;9(8):e102446. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102446. eCollection 2014.
2
The relationship between study addiction and work addiction: A cross-cultural longitudinal study.
J Behav Addict. 2016 Dec;5(4):708-714. doi: 10.1556/2006.5.2016.076. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
3
The Relationships between Workaholism and Symptoms of Psychiatric Disorders: A Large-Scale Cross-Sectional Study.
PLoS One. 2016 May 18;11(5):e0152978. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152978. eCollection 2016.
4
Study addiction--a new area of psychological study: conceptualization, assessment, and preliminary empirical findings.
J Behav Addict. 2015 Jun;4(2):75-84. doi: 10.1556/2006.4.2015.007. Epub 2015 May 27.
6
A predictive study of antecedent variables of workaholism.
Psicothema. 2016 Nov;28(4):401-406. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2015.345.
7
Addiction to Work: A Critical Review of the Workaholism Construct and Recommendations for Assessment.
J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 2015 Oct;53(10):48-59. doi: 10.3928/02793695-20150923-04.
8
Development of a work addiction scale.
Scand J Psychol. 2012 Jun;53(3):265-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2012.00947.x. Epub 2012 Apr 10.
9
Study Addiction: A Cross-Cultural Longitudinal Study Examining Temporal Stability and Predictors of Its Changes.
J Behav Addict. 2016 Jun;5(2):357-62. doi: 10.1556/2006.5.2016.024. Epub 2016 May 9.
10
Workaholism and mental health problems among municipal middle managers in Norway.
J Occup Environ Med. 2014 Oct;56(10):1042-51. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000223.

引用本文的文献

1
The relationship between work addiction and addictions to social media, shopping, food, caffeine, and nicotine.
Aust J Psychol. 2025 Apr 2;77(1):2486774. doi: 10.1080/00049530.2025.2486774. eCollection 2025.
2
Assessing Work Addiction: Validity of the Italian Version of the Work Addiction Risk Test.
Med Lav. 2025 Jun 17;116(3):16177. doi: 10.23749/mdl.v116i3.16177.
3
Long-term chronicity of work addiction: the role of personality and work motivations.
BMC Psychol. 2025 May 29;13(1):578. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02907-6.
4
Intact habit learning in work addiction: Evidence from a probabilistic sequence learning task.
Addict Behav Rep. 2025 Feb 10;21:100589. doi: 10.1016/j.abrep.2025.100589. eCollection 2025 Jun.
6
Work addiction risk, stress and well-being at work: testing the mediating role of sleep quality.
Front Public Health. 2024 Jun 20;12:1352646. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1352646. eCollection 2024.
9
Personality traits and the degree of work addiction among Polish women: the mediating role of depressiveness.
Front Public Health. 2023 Dec 20;11:1305734. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1305734. eCollection 2023.
10
Psychometric properties of the Bergen Work Addiction Scale in a Greek sample of health professionals.
Health Psychol Rep. 2022 Oct 24;11(2):156-165. doi: 10.5114/hpr/153494. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
The relationships between behavioral addictions and the five-factor model of personality.
J Behav Addict. 2013 Jun;2(2):90-9. doi: 10.1556/JBA.2.2013.003.
2
Workaholism: An overview and current status of the research.
J Behav Addict. 2014 Mar;3(1):1-11. doi: 10.1556/JBA.2.2013.017. Epub 2013 Dec 6.
3
The treatment of workaholism with meditation awareness training: a case study.
Explore (NY). 2014 May-Jun;10(3):193-5. doi: 10.1016/j.explore.2014.02.004. Epub 2014 Feb 25.
6
Demographic and occupational correlates of workaholism.
Psychol Rep. 2012 Apr;110(2):547-54. doi: 10.2466/03.09.17.PR0.110.2.547-554.
7
The Beck depression inventory-II in adolescent mental health patients: cut-off scores for detecting depression and rating severity.
Psychiatry Res. 2012 Dec 30;200(2-3):843-8. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2012.05.011. Epub 2012 May 30.
8
Development of a work addiction scale.
Scand J Psychol. 2012 Jun;53(3):265-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2012.00947.x. Epub 2012 Apr 10.
9
Further psychometric study of the Beck Anxiety Inventory including factorial analysis and social anxiety disorder screening.
Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2011 Nov;15(4):255-62. doi: 10.3109/13651501.2011.605955.
10
Prevalence of the addictions: a problem of the majority or the minority?
Eval Health Prof. 2011 Mar;34(1):3-56. doi: 10.1177/0163278710380124. Epub 2010 Sep 27.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验