Suppr超能文献

美国成年人中,酒精政策环境和政策亚组作为暴饮措施的预测因素。

The alcohol policy environment and policy subgroups as predictors of binge drinking measures among US adults.

作者信息

Xuan Ziming, Blanchette Jason, Nelson Toben F, Heeren Timothy, Oussayef Nadia, Naimi Timothy S

机构信息

Ziming Xuan is with the Department of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA. Timothy Heeren is with the Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health. Nadia Oussayef is with the Department of Health Law, Bioethics & Human Rights, Boston University School of Public Health. Timothy S. Naimi and Jason Blanchette are with the Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA. Toben F. Nelson is with the Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2015 Apr;105(4):816-22. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302112. Epub 2014 Aug 14.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We examined the relationships of the state-level alcohol policy environment and policy subgroups with individual-level binge drinking measures.

METHODS

We used generalized estimating equations regression models to relate the alcohol policy environment based on data from 29 policies in US states from 2004 to 2009 to 3 binge drinking measures in adults from the 2005 to 2010 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System surveys.

RESULTS

A 10 percentage point higher alcohol policy environment score, which reflected increased policy effectiveness and implementation, was associated with an 8% lower adjusted odds of binge drinking and binge drinking 5 or more times, and a 10% lower adjusted odds of consuming 10 or more drinks. Policies that targeted the general population rather than the underage population, alcohol consumption rather than impaired driving, and raising the price or reducing the availability of alcohol had the strongest independent associations with reduced binge drinking. Alcohol taxes and outlet density accounted for approximately half of the effect magnitude observed for all policies.

CONCLUSIONS

A small number of policies that raised alcohol prices and reduced its availability appeared to affect binge drinking.

摘要

目的

我们研究了州级酒精政策环境及政策子类别与个体层面暴饮措施之间的关系。

方法

我们运用广义估计方程回归模型,根据2004年至2009年美国各州29项政策的数据,将酒精政策环境与2005年至2010年行为危险因素监测系统调查中成年人的3项暴饮措施联系起来。

结果

酒精政策环境得分高出10个百分点,这反映出政策有效性和实施情况有所改善,与暴饮及暴饮5次或以上的校正后几率降低8%,以及饮用10杯或更多酒的校正后几率降低10%相关。针对普通人群而非未成年人群、针对酒精消费而非酒后驾车、提高酒精价格或减少酒精可得性的政策,与减少暴饮的独立关联最为显著。酒精税和销售点密度约占所有政策观察到的效应量的一半。

结论

少数提高酒精价格并减少其可得性的政策似乎对暴饮有影响。

相似文献

2
Patterns of alcohol consumption and alcohol-impaired driving in the United States.美国的饮酒模式与酒后驾车情况
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2008 Apr;32(4):639-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2008.00622.x. Epub 2008 Mar 13.

引用本文的文献

2
Relationships of State Alcohol Policy Environments With Homicides and Suicides.国家酒精政策环境与凶杀和自杀的关系。
Am J Prev Med. 2024 Aug;67(2):193-200. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2024.04.002. Epub 2024 Apr 10.
4
The Interplay of Local- and State-Level Alcohol Policies in the United States.美国地方和州级酒精政策的相互作用。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2024 Jul;85(4):463-467. doi: 10.15288/jsad.23-00381. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
7
Hazardous drinking and alcohol use disorders.有害饮酒和酒精使用障碍。
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2022 Dec 22;8(1):80. doi: 10.1038/s41572-022-00406-1.

本文引用的文献

3
State costs of excessive alcohol consumption, 2006.2006 年过度饮酒的国家成本。
Am J Prev Med. 2013 Oct;45(4):474-85. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.06.004.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验