Xuan Ziming, Blanchette Jason, Nelson Toben F, Heeren Timothy, Oussayef Nadia, Naimi Timothy S
Ziming Xuan is with the Department of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA. Timothy Heeren is with the Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health. Nadia Oussayef is with the Department of Health Law, Bioethics & Human Rights, Boston University School of Public Health. Timothy S. Naimi and Jason Blanchette are with the Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA. Toben F. Nelson is with the Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis.
Am J Public Health. 2015 Apr;105(4):816-22. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302112. Epub 2014 Aug 14.
We examined the relationships of the state-level alcohol policy environment and policy subgroups with individual-level binge drinking measures.
We used generalized estimating equations regression models to relate the alcohol policy environment based on data from 29 policies in US states from 2004 to 2009 to 3 binge drinking measures in adults from the 2005 to 2010 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System surveys.
A 10 percentage point higher alcohol policy environment score, which reflected increased policy effectiveness and implementation, was associated with an 8% lower adjusted odds of binge drinking and binge drinking 5 or more times, and a 10% lower adjusted odds of consuming 10 or more drinks. Policies that targeted the general population rather than the underage population, alcohol consumption rather than impaired driving, and raising the price or reducing the availability of alcohol had the strongest independent associations with reduced binge drinking. Alcohol taxes and outlet density accounted for approximately half of the effect magnitude observed for all policies.
A small number of policies that raised alcohol prices and reduced its availability appeared to affect binge drinking.
我们研究了州级酒精政策环境及政策子类别与个体层面暴饮措施之间的关系。
我们运用广义估计方程回归模型,根据2004年至2009年美国各州29项政策的数据,将酒精政策环境与2005年至2010年行为危险因素监测系统调查中成年人的3项暴饮措施联系起来。
酒精政策环境得分高出10个百分点,这反映出政策有效性和实施情况有所改善,与暴饮及暴饮5次或以上的校正后几率降低8%,以及饮用10杯或更多酒的校正后几率降低10%相关。针对普通人群而非未成年人群、针对酒精消费而非酒后驾车、提高酒精价格或减少酒精可得性的政策,与减少暴饮的独立关联最为显著。酒精税和销售点密度约占所有政策观察到的效应量的一半。
少数提高酒精价格并减少其可得性的政策似乎对暴饮有影响。