Suppr超能文献

美国酒精政策环境新量表及其与狂饮的关系。

A new scale of the U.S. alcohol policy environment and its relationship to binge drinking.

机构信息

Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Community Health Sciences, Boston, Massachusetts.

Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

Am J Prev Med. 2014 Jan;46(1):10-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.07.015.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Of outcomes related to excessive drinking, binge drinking accounts for approximately half of alcohol-attributable deaths, two thirds of years of potential life lost, and three fourths of economic costs. The extent to which the alcohol policy environment accounts for differences in binge drinking in U.S. states is unknown.

PURPOSE

The goal of the study was to describe the development of an Alcohol Policy Scale (APS) designed to measure the aggregate state-level alcohol policy environment in the U.S. and assess the relationship of APS scores to state-level adult binge drinking prevalence in U.S. states.

METHODS

Policy efficacy and implementation ratings were developed with assistance from a panel of policy experts. Data on 29 policies in 50 states and Washington DC from 2000-2010 were collected from multiple sources and analyzed between January 2012 and January 2013. Five methods of aggregating policy data to calculate APS scores were explored; all but one was weighted for relative policy efficacy and/or implementation. Adult (aged ≥18 years) binge drinking prevalence data from 2001-2010 was obtained from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System surveys. APS scores from a particular state-year were used to predict binge drinking prevalence during the following year.

RESULTS

All methods of calculating APS scores were significantly correlated (r >0.50), and all APS scores were significantly inversely associated with adult binge drinking prevalence. Introducing efficacy and implementation ratings optimized goodness of fit in statistical models (e.g., unadjusted beta=-3.90, p<0.0001, R(2)=0.31).

CONCLUSIONS

The composite measure(s) of the alcohol policy environment have internal and construct validity. Higher APS scores (representing stronger policy environments) were associated with less adult binge drinking and accounted for a substantial proportion of the state-level variation in binge drinking among U.S. states.

摘要

背景

在与过量饮酒相关的后果中, binge drinking(狂饮)约占酒精相关死亡的一半、丧失三分之二的预期寿命年数和三分之四的经济成本。美国各州 binge drinking(狂饮)差异在多大程度上与酒精政策环境有关尚不清楚。

目的

本研究的目的是描述一种酒精政策量表(APS)的开发,该量表旨在衡量美国各州的总体州级酒精政策环境,并评估 APS 评分与美国各州成年 binge drinking(狂饮)流行率之间的关系。

方法

在一组政策专家的协助下,制定了政策效果和实施评分。2000-2010 年,从 50 个州和华盛顿特区收集了 29 项政策的数据,数据来源于多个来源,并于 2012 年 1 月至 2013 年 1 月进行了分析。探索了五种聚合政策数据以计算 APS 评分的方法;除一种方法外,所有方法都对相对政策效果和/或实施进行了加权。从 2001-2010 年的行为风险因素监测系统调查中获得了成年 binge drinking(狂饮)流行率数据。特定州年的 APS 评分用于预测次年的 binge drinking(狂饮)流行率。

结果

所有计算 APS 评分的方法均显著相关(r>0.50),所有 APS 评分均与成年 binge drinking(狂饮)流行率呈显著负相关。引入效果和实施评分可优化统计模型的拟合优度(例如,未经调整的β=-3.90,p<0.0001,R(2)=0.31)。

结论

酒精政策环境的综合指标具有内部和结构有效性。更高的 APS 评分(代表更强的政策环境)与更少的成年 binge drinking(狂饮)相关,并解释了美国各州 binge drinking(狂饮)水平的很大一部分州级差异。

相似文献

1
A new scale of the U.S. alcohol policy environment and its relationship to binge drinking.
Am J Prev Med. 2014 Jan;46(1):10-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.07.015.
2
Evaluating the relationship between binge drinking rates and a replicable measure of U.S. state alcohol policy environments.
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 25;14(6):e0218718. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218718. eCollection 2019.
6
Alcohol Policies and Alcoholic Cirrhosis Mortality in the United States.
Prev Chronic Dis. 2015 Oct 15;12:E177. doi: 10.5888/pcd12.150200.
7
Youth Drinking in the United States: Relationships With Alcohol Policies and Adult Drinking.
Pediatrics. 2015 Jul;136(1):18-27. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-0537. Epub 2015 Jun 1.
8
Efficacy and the strength of evidence of U.S. alcohol control policies.
Am J Prev Med. 2013 Jul;45(1):19-28. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.03.008.
10
Alcohol Policies in U.S. States, 1999-2018.
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2020 Jan;81(1):58-67. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2020.81.58.

引用本文的文献

2
Young Adults and Alcohol-Associated Liver Cancer: Incidence and Death from 2000 to 2021.
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Feb 11;17(4):609. doi: 10.3390/cancers17040609.
5
Area-Level Social Determinants of Alcohol-Related Mortality: Knowledge Gaps and Implications for Community Health.
Alcohol Res. 2024 Oct 31;44(1):06. doi: 10.35946/arcr.v44.1.06. eCollection 2024.
7
Assessing the implementation of evidence-based alcohol policies on Atlantic Canadian post-secondary campuses: A comparative analysis.
Can J Public Health. 2024 Oct;115(5):789-800. doi: 10.17269/s41997-024-00907-4. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
8
9
Relationships of State Alcohol Policy Environments With Homicides and Suicides.
Am J Prev Med. 2024 Aug;67(2):193-200. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2024.04.002. Epub 2024 Apr 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy and the strength of evidence of U.S. alcohol control policies.
Am J Prev Med. 2013 Jul;45(1):19-28. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.03.008.
2
Weight status among adolescents in States that govern competitive food nutrition content.
Pediatrics. 2012 Sep;130(3):437-44. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-3353. Epub 2012 Aug 13.
3
Adolescent drinking patterns across countries: associations with alcohol policies.
Alcohol Alcohol. 2012 Nov-Dec;47(6):732-7. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/ags083. Epub 2012 Jul 17.
4
Alcohol policies and practices among four-year colleges in the United States: prevalence and patterns.
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2012 May;73(3):361-7. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2012.73.361.
6
The effectiveness of alcohol control policies on alcohol-related traffic fatalities in the United States.
Accid Anal Prev. 2012 Mar;45:406-15. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2011.08.008. Epub 2011 Sep 16.
7
Economic costs of excessive alcohol consumption in the U.S., 2006.
Am J Prev Med. 2011 Nov;41(5):516-24. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.06.045.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验