• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Multi-stakeholder collaboration in the redesign of family-centered rounds process.多利益相关者合作重新设计以家庭为中心的查房流程。
Appl Ergon. 2015 Jan;46 Pt A:115-23. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2014.07.011. Epub 2014 Aug 12.
2
Application of participatory ergonomics to the redesign of the family-centred rounds process.参与式工效学在以家庭为中心的查房流程重新设计中的应用。
Ergonomics. 2015;58(10):1726-44. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2015.1029534. Epub 2015 Apr 22.
3
Stimulated recall methodology for assessing work system barriers and facilitators in family-centered rounds in a pediatric hospital.用于评估儿童医院以家庭为中心查房中工作系统障碍和促进因素的刺激回忆法。
Appl Ergon. 2014 Nov;45(6):1540-6. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2014.05.001. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
4
A case study of healthcare providers' goals during interprofessional rounds.医疗保健提供者在跨专业查房期间目标的案例研究。
J Interprof Care. 2017 Jul;31(4):463-469. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2017.1306497. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
5
An Interactive Evaluation of Patient/Family Centered Rounds on Pediatric Inpatient Units.儿科住院病房以患者/家庭为中心的查房的交互式评估
J Pediatr Nurs. 2015 Jul-Aug;30(4):e9-e15. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2014.11.005. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
6
Strategies for improving family engagement during family-centered rounds.提高以家庭为中心的查房中家庭参与度的策略。
J Hosp Med. 2013 Apr;8(4):201-7. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2022. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
7
A systematic review of human factors and ergonomics (HFE)-based healthcare system redesign for quality of care and patient safety.基于人因工程学(HFE)的医疗系统重新设计以提高医疗质量和患者安全的系统评价。
Ergonomics. 2015;58(1):33-49. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2014.959070. Epub 2014 Oct 17.
8
Interprofessional rhetoric and operational realities: an ethnographic study of rounds in four intensive care units.跨专业的言辞与操作现实:对四个重症监护病房查房的人种志研究
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2016 Oct;21(4):735-48. doi: 10.1007/s10459-015-9662-5. Epub 2015 Dec 24.
9
Family-centered rounds in theory and practice: an ethnographic case study.家庭中心查房的理论与实践:一项人种志案例研究。
Acad Pediatr. 2014 Mar-Apr;14(2):200-6. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2013.11.003.
10
Family-professional collaboration in pediatric rehabilitation: a practice model.儿科康复中的家庭 - 专业人员协作:一种实践模式。
Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(5):434-40. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2013.797510. Epub 2013 May 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Conceptualizing the learning organization in nursing homes: a scoping review.疗养院中学习型组织的概念化:一项范围综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Apr 30;25(1):621. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12674-0.
2
Eight years into the horizon of aspirational maternal and newborn health pledges: a nationwide cross-sectional exploration of the Burundian EmONC network capacity and budget deficits.在有抱负的母婴健康承诺的视野中进行了八年:对布隆迪紧急产科和新生儿护理网络能力和预算赤字的全国性横断面探索。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 23;14(5):e083546. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083546.
3
Retrospective analysis of the human-centered design process used to develop a clinical decision support in the emergency department: PE Dx Study Part 2.用于开发急诊科临床决策支持的以人为本设计过程的回顾性分析:PE Dx研究第2部分
Hum Factors Health. 2023 Dec;4. doi: 10.1016/j.hfh.2023.100055. Epub 2023 Sep 30.
4
Experiences of participants in the co-design of a community-based health service for people with high healthcare service use.具有高医疗服务使用量人群的社区卫生服务共同设计中参与者的经验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Mar 14;24(1):339. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10788-5.
5
Managing multiple perspectives in the collaborative design process of a team health information technology.团队健康信息技术协作设计过程中的多重视角管理。
Appl Ergon. 2023 Jan;106:103846. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103846. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
6
Telerounding: A scoping review and implications for future healthcare practice.远程查房:一项范围综述及对未来医疗实践的启示
Hum Factors Health. 2021 Dec;1. doi: 10.1016/j.hfh.2022.100008. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
7
Iterative redesign of a caregiver-mediated intervention for use in educational settings.迭代式重新设计一种用于教育环境的照护者介导干预措施。
Autism. 2022 Apr;26(3):666-677. doi: 10.1177/13623613211066644. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
8
Schedule-based Family-centered Rounds: A Novel Approach to Achieve High Nursing Attendance and Participation.基于日程安排的以家庭为中心的查房:实现高护理出勤率和参与度的新方法。
Pediatr Qual Saf. 2020 Mar 13;5(2):e265. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000265. eCollection 2020 Mar-Apr.
9
Disasters can happen to anybody: The case of Korea.灾难可能降临到任何人身上:韩国的案例。
Environ Impact Assess Rev. 2016 Feb;57:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2015.11.002. Epub 2015 Nov 14.
10
SEIPS 3.0: Human-centered design of the patient journey for patient safety.SEIPS 3.0:以患者安全为中心的患者就医流程的人因工程设计。
Appl Ergon. 2020 Apr;84:103033. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.103033. Epub 2020 Jan 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Enhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams.提高工作团队的效率。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2006 Dec;7(3):77-124. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00030.x. Epub 2006 Dec 1.
2
Stimulated recall methodology for assessing work system barriers and facilitators in family-centered rounds in a pediatric hospital.用于评估儿童医院以家庭为中心查房中工作系统障碍和促进因素的刺激回忆法。
Appl Ergon. 2014 Nov;45(6):1540-6. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2014.05.001. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
3
SEIPS 2.0: a human factors framework for studying and improving the work of healthcare professionals and patients.SEIPS 2.0:一种用于研究和改善医疗保健专业人员和患者工作的人因学框架。
Ergonomics. 2013;56(11):1669-86. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2013.838643. Epub 2013 Oct 3.
4
Human factors systems approach to healthcare quality and patient safety.人因系统方法在医疗质量和患者安全中的应用。
Appl Ergon. 2014 Jan;45(1):14-25. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2013.04.023. Epub 2013 Jul 8.
5
Human factors and ergonomics as a patient safety practice.人为因素与工效学作为患者安全实践。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Mar;23(3):196-205. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-001812. Epub 2013 Jun 28.
6
Design of systems for productivity and well being.生产效率和健康系统的设计。
Appl Ergon. 2014 Jan;45(1):26-32. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2013.03.022. Epub 2013 Apr 28.
7
Strategies for improving family engagement during family-centered rounds.提高以家庭为中心的查房中家庭参与度的策略。
J Hosp Med. 2013 Apr;8(4):201-7. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2022. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
8
A strategy for human factors/ergonomics: developing the discipline and profession.人因/工效学策略:发展学科和专业。
Ergonomics. 2012;55(4):377-95. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2012.661087. Epub 2012 Feb 15.
9
Patient- and family-centered care and the pediatrician's role.以患者和家庭为中心的护理和儿科医生的角色。
Pediatrics. 2012 Feb;129(2):394-404. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-3084. Epub 2012 Jan 30.
10
Factors of collaborative working: a framework for a collaboration model.协作因素:协作模型框架。
Appl Ergon. 2012 Jan;43(1):1-26. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2011.04.009. Epub 2011 May 26.

多利益相关者合作重新设计以家庭为中心的查房流程。

Multi-stakeholder collaboration in the redesign of family-centered rounds process.

作者信息

Xie Anping, Carayon Pascale, Cartmill Randi, Li Yaqiong, Cox Elizabeth D, Plotkin Julie A, Kelly Michelle M

机构信息

Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Center for Quality and Productivity Improvement, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA; Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.

出版信息

Appl Ergon. 2015 Jan;46 Pt A:115-23. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2014.07.011. Epub 2014 Aug 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2014.07.011
PMID:25124394
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4185236/
Abstract

A human factors approach to healthcare system redesign emphasizes the involvement of multiple healthcare stakeholders (e.g., patients and families, healthcare providers) in the redesign process. This study explores the experience of multiple stakeholders with collaboration in a healthcare system redesign project. Interviews were conducted with ten stakeholder representatives who participated in the redesign of the family-centered rounds process in a pediatric hospital. Qualitative interview data were analyzed using a phenomenological approach. A model of collaborative healthcare system redesign was developed, which defined four phases (i.e., setup of the redesign team, preparation for meetings, collaboration in meetings, follow-up after meetings) and two outcomes (i.e., team outcomes, redesign outcomes) of the collaborative process. Challenges to multi-stakeholder collaboration in healthcare system redesign, such as need to represent all relevant stakeholders, scheduling of meetings and managing different perspectives, were identified.

摘要

一种以人因工程学为导向的医疗系统重新设计方法强调多个医疗利益相关者(如患者及其家属、医疗服务提供者)参与重新设计过程。本研究探讨了多个利益相关者在一个医疗系统重新设计项目中的协作经验。对参与一家儿科医院以家庭为中心的查房流程重新设计的十名利益相关者代表进行了访谈。使用现象学方法对定性访谈数据进行了分析。开发了一个协作式医疗系统重新设计模型,该模型定义了协作过程的四个阶段(即重新设计团队的组建、会议准备、会议中的协作、会后跟进)和两个结果(即团队结果、重新设计结果)。确定了医疗系统重新设计中多利益相关者协作面临的挑战,如需要代表所有相关利益者、会议安排以及管理不同观点等。