Suppr超能文献

是还是不是:听众迅速利用韵律来推断说话者的意思。

Is it or isn't it: listeners make rapid use of prosody to infer speaker meanings.

作者信息

Kurumada Chigusa, Brown Meredith, Bibyk Sarah, Pontillo Daniel F, Tanenhaus Michael K

机构信息

Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester, United States.

Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester, United States.

出版信息

Cognition. 2014 Nov;133(2):335-42. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.05.017. Epub 2014 Aug 14.

Abstract

A visual world experiment examined the time course for pragmatic inferences derived from visual context and contrastive intonation contours. We used the construction It looks like an X pronounced with either (a) a H() pitch accent on the final noun and a low boundary tone, or (b) a contrastive L+H() pitch accent and a rising boundary tone, a contour that can support contrastive inference (e.g., It LOOKSL+Hlike a zebraL-H%… (but it is not)). When the visual display contained a single related set of contrasting pictures (e.g. a zebra vs. a zebra-like animal), effects of LOOKSL+H emerged prior to the processing of phonemic information from the target noun. The results indicate that the prosodic processing is incremental and guided by contextually-supported expectations. Additional analyses ruled out explanations based on context-independent heuristics that might substitute for online computation of contrast.

摘要

一项视觉世界实验研究了从视觉语境和对比语调轮廓中得出语用推理的时间进程。我们使用了 “It looks like an X” 这一结构,该结构在发音时要么(a)在最后一个名词上带有H()音高重音和低边界调,要么(b)带有对比性的L+H()音高重音和升调边界调,这种语调轮廓能够支持对比推理(例如,“It LOOKSL+Hlike a zebraL-H%…(但它不是)”)。当视觉展示包含一组单一的相关对比图片时(例如,一匹斑马与一种类似斑马的动物),“LOOKSL+H” 的效应在处理目标名词的音素信息之前就已出现。结果表明,韵律处理是渐进的,并受语境支持的预期所引导。进一步的分析排除了基于与语境无关的启发式方法的解释,这些方法可能会替代对比的在线计算。

相似文献

1
Is it or isn't it: listeners make rapid use of prosody to infer speaker meanings.
Cognition. 2014 Nov;133(2):335-42. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.05.017. Epub 2014 Aug 14.
2
Effects of distributional information on categorization of prosodic contours.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Jun;25(3):1153-1160. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1332-6.
3
Pitch accents in context: how listeners process accentuation in referential communication.
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Jun;49(7):2022-36. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.03.032. Epub 2011 Mar 30.
5
Pragmatic inferences in context: learning to interpret contrastive prosody.
J Child Lang. 2017 Jul;44(4):850-880. doi: 10.1017/S0305000916000246. Epub 2016 May 26.
6
When (not) to Look for Contrastive Alternatives: The Role of Pitch Accent Type and Additive Particles.
Lang Speech. 2019 Dec;62(4):751-778. doi: 10.1177/0023830918814279. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
7
Finding referents in time: eye-tracking evidence for the role of contrastive accents.
Lang Speech. 2006;49(Pt 3):367-92. doi: 10.1177/00238309060490030301.
8
When pitch Accents Encode Speaker Commitment: Evidence from French Intonation.
Lang Speech. 2016 Jun;59(Pt 2):266-93. doi: 10.1177/0023830915587337.
9
Prenuclear L+H Activates Alternatives for the Accented Word.
Front Psychol. 2019 Sep 24;10:1993. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01993. eCollection 2019.
10
Contrastive intonation effects on word recall for information-structural alternatives across the sexes.
Mem Cognit. 2021 Oct;49(7):1312-1333. doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01174-1. Epub 2021 May 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Expectation violations signal goals in novel human communication.
Nat Commun. 2025 Feb 26;16(1):1989. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-57025-z.
3
Evidence For Selective Adaptation and Recalibration in the Perception of Lexical Stress.
Lang Speech. 2022 Jun;65(2):472-490. doi: 10.1177/00238309211030307. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
4
Eye see what you're saying: Contrastive use of beat gesture and pitch accent affects online interpretation of spoken discourse.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2021 Sep;47(9):1494-1526. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000986. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
5
Processing of Prosody and Semantics in Sepedi and L2 English.
J Psycholinguist Res. 2021 Jun;50(3):681-706. doi: 10.1007/s10936-020-09746-z. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
7
Crossmodal Language Comprehension-Psycholinguistic Insights and Computational Approaches.
Front Neurorobot. 2020 Jan 31;14:2. doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2020.00002. eCollection 2020.
8
Priming Effects of Focus in Mandarin Chinese.
Front Psychol. 2019 Aug 30;10:1985. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01985. eCollection 2019.
10
Effects of Implicit Prosody and Semantic Bias on the Resolution of Ambiguous Chinese Phrases.
Front Psychol. 2019 Jun 4;10:1308. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01308. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Processing scalar implicature: a constraint-based approach.
Cogn Sci. 2015 May;39(4):667-710. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12171. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
2
Immediate effects of anticipatory coarticulation in spoken-word recognition.
J Mem Lang. 2014 Feb 1;71(1):145-163. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2013.11.002.
3
Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.
J Mem Lang. 2013 Apr;68(3). doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001.
4
The P-chain: relating sentence production and its disorders to comprehension and acquisition.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013 Dec 9;369(1634):20120394. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0394. Print 2014.
5
Rapid Expectation Adaptation during Syntactic Comprehension.
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 30;8(10):e77661. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077661. eCollection 2013.
6
Prediction, explanation, and the role of generative models in language processing.
Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Jun;36(3):211-2. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12002312. Epub 2013 May 10.
7
Evidence for implicit learning in syntactic comprehension.
Cogn Sci. 2013 Apr;37(3):578-91. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12022. Epub 2013 Jan 30.
9
Taking the epistemic step: toward a model of on-line access to conversational implicatures.
Cognition. 2013 Mar;126(3):423-40. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.11.012. Epub 2013 Jan 4.
10
Learning individual talkers' structural preferences.
Cognition. 2012 Jul;124(1):66-71. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.03.001. Epub 2012 Apr 11.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验