Petersson A C, Eliasson I, Kamme C, Miörner H
Department of Clinical Microbiology, Lund Hospital, Sweden.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1989 Nov;8(11):962-7. doi: 10.1007/BF01967566.
Four qualitative methods for the detection of beta-lactamase production in Staphylococcus and Micrococcus species were evaluated and compared with a quantitative macroiodometric reference method. The disc diffusion test with penicillin G and the cloverleaf method could not separate beta-lactamase-positive from beta-lactamase-negative strains. Two applications of the chromogenic cephalosporin test, using uninduced strains and strains grown on blood agar plates, gave a large number of false negative and false positive results. False negative reactions were most common among uninduced strains, while the false positive reactions were most often recorded for Staphylococcus saprophyticus. A high degree of efficiency was recorded for the nitrocefin spot test, using induced strains grown on antibiotic susceptibility agar, and for the starch-iodine plate method. The starch-iodine plate with methicillin as inducer gave the most reliable results.
对检测葡萄球菌属和微球菌属中β-内酰胺酶产生的四种定性方法进行了评估,并与定量宏观碘量法参考方法进行了比较。用青霉素G进行的纸片扩散试验和三叶草叶法无法区分β-内酰胺酶阳性菌株和β-内酰胺酶阴性菌株。使用未诱导菌株和在血琼脂平板上生长的菌株进行的显色头孢菌素试验的两种应用产生了大量假阴性和假阳性结果。假阴性反应在未诱导菌株中最为常见,而腐生葡萄球菌最常出现假阳性反应。使用在抗生素敏感性琼脂上生长的诱导菌株进行的硝基头孢菌素斑点试验和淀粉碘平板法记录了较高的效率。以甲氧西林为诱导剂的淀粉碘平板给出了最可靠的结果。