Doern G V, Jones R N, Gerlach E H, Washington J A, Biedenbach D J, Brueggemann A, Erwin M E, Knapp C, Raymond J
University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester 01655, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Jun;33(6):1665-7. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.6.1665-1667.1995.
S1, a new chromogenic cephalosporin (International BioClinical, Inc., Portland, Oreg.), was used to detect beta-lactamase production among a variety of commonly encountered bacteria in a four-center collaborative study. Results of an S1 disk assay were compared with those obtained by a nitrocefin-based disk procedure (Cefinase; Becton-Dickinson Microbiology Systems, Cockeysville, Md.), with repetitive testing of five quality control organisms and with individual tests of recent clinical isolates of Neisseria gonorrhoeae (162 strains), Haemophilus influenzae (162 strains), Moraxella catarrhalis (155 strains), Staphylococcus aureus (161 strains), and Bacteroides fragilis (164 strains). The performances of the two beta-lactamase disk assays were comparable for the first three species cited above. However, the S1 assay appeared to be a more sensitive procedure than the Cefinase assay when applied to S. aureus and B. fragilis, with respect to both total numbers of positive results and length of time to a definitive positive endpoint.
在一项四中心合作研究中,新型显色头孢菌素S1(国际生物临床公司,俄勒冈州波特兰)被用于检测多种常见细菌中的β-内酰胺酶产生情况。将S1纸片法检测结果与基于头孢硝噻吩的纸片法(头孢硝噻吩酶检测纸片;Becton-Dickinson微生物系统公司,马里兰州科基斯维尔)的结果进行比较,对5种质量控制菌株进行重复检测,并对淋病奈瑟菌(162株)、流感嗜血杆菌(162株)、卡他莫拉菌(155株)、金黄色葡萄球菌(161株)和脆弱拟杆菌(164株)的近期临床分离株进行单独检测。对于上述前三个菌种,两种β-内酰胺酶纸片法的性能相当。然而,就阳性结果总数和明确阳性终点的时间长度而言,当应用于金黄色葡萄球菌和脆弱拟杆菌时,S1检测法似乎比头孢硝噻吩酶检测法更灵敏。