Suppr超能文献

调查澳大利亚墨尔本两个社区患者对医疗回访及在线购药的看法:一项定性研究的结果

Investigating patient perspectives on medical returns and buying medicines online in two communities in Melbourne, Australia: results from a qualitative study.

作者信息

Brijnath Bianca, Antoniades Josefine, Adams Jon

机构信息

Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia,

出版信息

Patient. 2015 Apr;8(2):229-38. doi: 10.1007/s40271-014-0082-z.

Abstract

AIMS

By going online or overseas, patients can purchase a range of prescription and over-the-counter drugs and complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), without prescription and without input from a qualified health professional. Such practices raise questions about medicine safety and how and why patients choose to procure medicines using such methods. The aim of this paper is to examine two unconventional types of medicine procurement-medical returns and purchasing medicines online-from the patient perspective.

METHODS

Data are drawn from a large qualitative study examining health-seeking practices among Indian-Australians (28) and Anglo-Australians (30) living with depression in Melbourne, Australia. Semi-structured face-to-face interviews were undertaken. Thematic analysis was performed.

FINDINGS

A total of 23 (39.6 %) participants reported having obtained medicines either through the internet or via medical returns. Indian-Australians sourced medicines from India while Anglo-Australians purchased CAM products from domestic and international e-pharmacies. Neither group encountered any difficulties in the medicines entering Australia. Cost and convenience were the main reasons for buying medicines online but dissatisfaction with Australian health services also influenced why Indian-Australians sought medicines from India. Nearly all participants reported benefits from consuming these medicines; only one person reported adverse effects.

CONCLUSION

The increased availability of medicines transnationally and patients' preparedness to procure these medicines from a range of sources raise important issues for the safe use of medicines. Further research is needed to understand how patients forge their own transnational therapeutic regimes, understand and manage their levels of risk in relation to safe medicine use and what points of intervention might be most effective to promote safe medicine use.

摘要

目的

通过上网或出国,患者无需处方且无需合格医疗专业人员的指导,就可以购买一系列处方药、非处方药以及补充和替代医学(CAM)产品。这种做法引发了关于药物安全性以及患者选择使用此类方法购药的方式和原因的问题。本文旨在从患者角度审视两种非常规的购药方式——医疗退货和网上购药。

方法

数据来自一项大型定性研究,该研究调查了澳大利亚墨尔本患有抑郁症的印度裔澳大利亚人(28名)和英裔澳大利亚人(30名)的求医行为。进行了半结构化面对面访谈,并开展了主题分析。

结果

共有23名(39.6%)参与者报告称通过互联网或医疗退货获得过药物。印度裔澳大利亚人从印度获取药物,而英裔澳大利亚人从国内外电子药房购买补充和替代医学产品。两组在药物进入澳大利亚时均未遇到任何困难。成本和便利性是网上购药的主要原因,但对澳大利亚医疗服务的不满也影响了印度裔澳大利亚人从印度购药的原因。几乎所有参与者都报告称服用这些药物有益;只有一人报告有不良反应。

结论

跨国药品供应的增加以及患者从多种渠道购药的意愿,引发了药物安全使用方面的重要问题。需要进一步研究以了解患者如何形成自己的跨国治疗方案,理解并管理与安全用药相关的风险水平,以及哪些干预点可能对促进安全用药最有效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验