Hoeppner Bettina B, Hoeppner Susanne S, Kelly John F
Center for Addiction Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 60 Staniford Street, Boston, MA 02114, United States.
Center for Addiction Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 60 Staniford Street, Boston, MA 02114, United States.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014 Oct 1;143:181-8. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.07.023. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
Research has shown that participation in Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) confers significant recovery benefit to adults suffering from alcohol use disorder (AUD). Concerns persist, however, that AA may not work as well for younger adults, who tend to have shorter addiction histories, different social circumstances, and less spiritual/religious interest than adults.
Secondary data analysis of Project MATCH, using a prospective, moderated multiple mediation analysis to test and compare six previously identified mechanisms of change in younger adults (n=266) vs. adults aged 30+ (n=1460). Nine clinical sites within the United States. Treatment-seeking adults (n=1726) suffering from AUD who participated in 12 weeks of outpatient treatment and completed follow-ups at 3-, 9- and 15-months. AA attendance during treatment; mediators at 9 months; and outcomes [percentage of days abstinent (PDA) and drinks per drinking day (DDD)] at 15 months.
AA attendance was associated with improved drinking outcomes in both younger adults (PDA: F(1, 247)=8.55, p<0.01; DDD: F(1, 247)=15.93, p<0.01) and adults aged 30+ (PDA: F(1, 1311)=86.58, p<0.01; DDD: F(1, 1311)=11.96, p<0.01). Only two of the six hypothesized pathways (i.e., decreases in pro-drinking social networks, self-efficacy in social situations) appeared to work in younger adults.
Unidentified mechanisms of behavior change that are mobilized by AA participation appear to be at work in young people. Once identified, these mechanisms may shed new light on how exactly AA confers similar benefits for young people and, more broadly, may enhance our understanding of recovery-related change for young adults that could yield novel intervention targets.
研究表明,参加戒酒互助会(AA)对患有酒精使用障碍(AUD)的成年人有显著的康复益处。然而,人们一直担心,AA对年轻人的效果可能不太好,因为年轻人的成瘾史较短,社会环境不同,且与成年人相比对精神/宗教的兴趣较低。
对“匹配计划”进行二次数据分析,采用前瞻性、调节多重中介分析来测试和比较先前确定的年轻人(n = 266)与30岁及以上成年人(n = 1460)的六种改变机制。美国境内的九个临床地点。寻求治疗的患有AUD的成年人(n = 1726),他们参加了为期12周的门诊治疗,并在3个月、9个月和15个月时完成随访。治疗期间参加AA的情况;9个月时的中介变量;以及15个月时的结果[戒酒天数百分比(PDA)和饮酒日饮酒量(DDD)]。
参加AA与年轻人(PDA:F(1, 247) = 8.55,p < 0.01;DDD:F(1, 247) = 15.93,p < 0.01)和30岁及以上成年人(PDA:F(1, 1311) = 86.58,p < 0.01;DDD:F(1, 1311) = 11.96,p < 0.01)饮酒结果的改善相关。六种假设途径中只有两种(即,促进饮酒的社交网络减少、社交场合中的自我效能感)在年轻人中似乎起作用。
通过参加AA调动的未明确的行为改变机制似乎在年轻人中起作用。一旦确定,这些机制可能会让我们更清楚地了解AA究竟如何为年轻人带来类似的益处,更广泛地说,可能会加深我们对年轻人与康复相关改变的理解,从而产生新的干预靶点。