• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国全国代表性样本中12步与第二波互助参与的患病率及其相关因素。

Prevalence and correlates of 12-step and second-wave mutual-help attendance in a nationally representative US sample.

作者信息

Bergman Brandon G, Greene M Claire, Zemore Sarah E, Kelly John F

机构信息

Recovery Research Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital & Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Program on Forced Migration and Health, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

Alcohol Clin Exp Res (Hoboken). 2024 Mar;48(3):545-555. doi: 10.1111/acer.15268. Epub 2024 Jan 21.

DOI:10.1111/acer.15268
PMID:38246752
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10939786/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mutual-help organizations (MHOs) are effective community-based, recovery support options for individuals with alcohol and other drug use disorders (i.e., substance use disorder; SUD). Greater understanding of second-wave MHOs, such as SMART Recovery, can help build on existing research that has focused primarily on 12-step MHOs, such as Alcoholics Anonymous, to inform scientific, practice, and policy recommendations.

METHODS

We conducted a secondary analysis of the National Recovery Study, a representative sample of US adults who resolved a substance use problem (N = 1984). Using survey-weighted estimates, we examined descriptive statistics for any lifetime, weekly lifetime, and past 90-day MHO attendance; we compared rates of 12-step and second-wave MHO attendance over time by descriptively examining distributions for calendar year of the first meeting attended. We also used two logistic regression models to examine demographic, substance use, clinical, and recovery-related correlates of weekly lifetime attendance separately for 12-step (n = 692) and second-wave MHOs (n = 32).

RESULTS

For any attendance, 41.4% attended a 12-step MHO and 2.9% a second-wave MHO; for weekly attendance, 31.9% attended a 12-step MHO, and 1.7% a second-wave MHO. Two-thirds (64%) of initial second-wave attendance occurred between 2006 and 2017 compared to 22% of initial 12-step attendance during this time frame. Significant correlates of weekly 12-step MHO attendance included histories of SUD treatment and arrest. Significant correlates of weekly second-wave MHO attendance included Black identity (vs. White) and history of SUD medication.

CONCLUSIONS

Attendance at second-wave MHOs is far less common than 12-step MHOs, but appears to be on the rise. Observed correlates of second-wave MHO attendance should be replicated in larger second-wave MHO samples before integrating these findings into best practices. Enhanced linkages from clinical and criminal justice settings to both second-wave and 12-step groups may help to "broaden the base" of MHOs.

摘要

背景

互助组织(MHOs)是针对患有酒精及其他药物使用障碍(即物质使用障碍;SUD)的个人,基于社区的有效康复支持选项。对诸如SMART Recovery等第二代互助组织有更深入的了解,有助于在主要聚焦于诸如戒酒互助会等12步互助组织的现有研究基础上,为科学、实践及政策建议提供参考。

方法

我们对全国康复研究进行了二次分析,该研究是对解决了物质使用问题的美国成年人的代表性样本(N = 1984)。使用调查加权估计,我们检查了任何终身、每周终身以及过去90天参加互助组织的描述性统计数据;通过描述性检查首次参加会议的日历年分布,我们比较了12步互助组织和第二代互助组织随时间的参与率。我们还使用了两个逻辑回归模型,分别针对12步互助组织(n = 692)和第二代互助组织(n = 32),研究每周终身参与的人口统计学、物质使用、临床及康复相关的关联因素。

结果

对于任何参与情况,41.4%的人参加了12步互助组织,2.9%的人参加了第二代互助组织;对于每周参与情况,31.9%的人参加了12步互助组织,1.7%的人参加了第二代互助组织。三分之二(64%)的第二代互助组织首次参与发生在2006年至2017年之间,而在此时间范围内第一代12步互助组织首次参与的比例为22%。每周参加12步互助组织的显著关联因素包括物质使用障碍治疗史和被捕史。每周参加第二代互助组织的显著关联因素包括黑人身份(与白人相比)和物质使用障碍药物治疗史。

结论

参加第二代互助组织的情况远不如12步互助组织常见,但似乎呈上升趋势。在将这些发现纳入最佳实践之前,应在更大的第二代互助组织样本中重复观察到的第二代互助组织参与的关联因素。加强临床和刑事司法环境与第二代和12步互助组织之间的联系,可能有助于“扩大”互助组织的“基础”。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8053/10939786/597062060c1d/nihms-1958787-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8053/10939786/597062060c1d/nihms-1958787-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8053/10939786/597062060c1d/nihms-1958787-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Prevalence and correlates of 12-step and second-wave mutual-help attendance in a nationally representative US sample.美国全国代表性样本中12步与第二波互助参与的患病率及其相关因素。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res (Hoboken). 2024 Mar;48(3):545-555. doi: 10.1111/acer.15268. Epub 2024 Jan 21.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Mode of mutual-help group attendance: Predictors and outcomes in a US national longitudinal survey of adults with lifetime alcohol use disorder.互助组参与模式:美国一项针对有终生酒精使用障碍的成年人的全国性纵向调查中的预测因素和结果。
J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2024 Sep;164:209395. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209395. Epub 2024 May 11.
4
Short-Term Memory Impairment短期记忆障碍
5
Psychological therapies for post-traumatic stress disorder and comorbid substance use disorder.创伤后应激障碍及共病物质使用障碍的心理治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 4;4(4):CD010204. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010204.pub2.
6
Healthcare workers' informal uses of mobile phones and other mobile devices to support their work: a qualitative evidence synthesis.医护人员非正规使用手机和其他移动设备来支持工作:定性证据综合评价。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Aug 27;8(8):CD015705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015705.pub2.
7
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
8
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
9
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
10
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Second-wave mutual-help groups: Examining effectiveness for individuals with alcohol use disorders in the longitudinal, U.S. national PAL Study cohorts.第二波互助小组:在美国全国性纵向 PAL 研究队列中,对患有酒精使用障碍的个体的有效性进行研究。
Int J Drug Policy. 2025 Jul 23:104921. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2025.104921.
2
Experiences With Online Mutual Support Groups for Problematic Drinking.针对问题饮酒的在线互助小组的经验
Psychiatr Serv. 2025 Jul 1;76(7):656-664. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.20240551. Epub 2025 Apr 23.
3
PROTOCOL: Mutual Help Organizations to Support Recovery Among Individuals Who Use Drugs: A Systematic Review Protocol.方案:互助组织对吸毒者康复的支持:一项系统评价方案
Campbell Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 4;21(1):e70021. doi: 10.1002/cl2.70021. eCollection 2025 Mar.
4
Who participates in the 'Celebrate Recovery' mutual-help organization? Results from a National US Investigation.谁参与了“庆祝康复”互助组织?美国一项全国性调查的结果。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2025 Feb 1;267:112532. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2024.112532. Epub 2025 Jan 3.
5
A systematic qualitative study investigating why individuals attend, and what they like, dislike, and find most helpful about, smart recovery, alcoholics anonymous, both, or neither.一项系统性定性研究,探究个体参加“明智康复”、“戒酒互助会”、两者都参加或两者都不参加的原因,以及他们喜欢、不喜欢这些组织的哪些方面,认为这些组织最有帮助的地方是什么。
J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2024 Jun;161:209337. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209337. Epub 2024 Mar 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Mutual-help group participation for substance use problems in the US: Correlates and trends from 2002 to 2018.美国互助小组参与解决物质使用问题的情况:2002年至2018年的相关因素及趋势
Addict Behav. 2022 May;128:107232. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.107232. Epub 2021 Dec 28.
2
Recruitment methods may influence prevalence estimates of people identifying as being in recovery from hazardous alcohol use.招募方法可能会影响自我报告危险饮酒康复人群的流行率估计。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 Oct 1;227:108960. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108960. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
3
THE ROLE OF SPIRITUALITY AND RELIGIOUSNESS IN AIDING RECOVERY FROM ALCOHOL AND OTHER DRUG PROBLEMS: AN INVESTIGATION IN A NATIONAL U.S. SAMPLE.灵性与宗教信仰在助力酒精及其他药物问题康复中的作用:一项美国全国样本调查
Psycholog Relig Spiritual. 2020 Feb;12(1):116-123. doi: 10.1037/rel0000295. Epub 2019 Dec 12.
4
Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Mutual Help Group Participation for Substance Use Problems.种族/民族差异在物质使用问题互助小组参与方面的体现。
Alcohol Res. 2021 Mar 11;41(1):03. doi: 10.35946/arcr.v41.1.03. eCollection 2021.
5
Impact of 12 step mutual help groups on drug use disorder patients across six clinical trials.12 步互助团体对六项临床试验中药物使用障碍患者的影响。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Oct 1;215:108213. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108213. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
6
Self-Help Groups And Medication Use In Opioid Addiction Treatment: A National Analysis.自助小组与阿片类药物成瘾治疗中的药物使用:一项全国性分析。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 May;39(5):740-746. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01021.
7
Psychosocial intervention utilization and substance abuse treatment outcomes in a multisite sample of individuals who use opioids.多地点使用阿片类药物者的社会心理干预利用与物质滥用治疗结局。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2020 May;112:68-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2020.01.016. Epub 2020 Jan 25.
8
Alcoholics Anonymous and other 12-step programs for alcohol use disorder.戒酒互助会及其他针对酒精使用障碍的12步康复计划。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Mar 11;3(3):CD012880. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012880.pub2.
9
One-Stop Shopping for Recovery: An Investigation of Participant Characteristics and Benefits Derived From U.S. Recovery Community Centers.一站式康复服务:美国康复社区中心的参与者特征和受益调查。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2020 Mar;44(3):711-721. doi: 10.1111/acer.14281. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
10
A longitudinal study of the comparative efficacy of Women for Sobriety, LifeRing, SMART Recovery, and 12-step groups for those with AUD.一项关于女性戒酒互助会、生命之环互助会、SMART 康复互助会和 12 步互助会对 AUD 患者疗效的比较的纵向研究。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2018 May;88:18-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2018.02.004. Epub 2018 Feb 17.