• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

所有的大猩猩物种(西部大猩猩、倭黑猩猩、黑猩猩、苏门答腊猩猩)以及两岁半的儿童(智人)都能区分表象与现实。

All great ape species (Gorilla gorilla, Pan paniscus, Pan troglodytes, Pongo abelii) and two-and-a-half-year-old children (Homo sapiens) discriminate appearance from reality.

作者信息

Karg Katja, Schmelz Martin, Call Josep, Tomasello Michael

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

出版信息

J Comp Psychol. 2014 Nov;128(4):431-9. doi: 10.1037/a0037385. Epub 2014 Aug 25.

DOI:10.1037/a0037385
PMID:25150962
Abstract

Nonhuman great apes and human children were tested for an understanding that appearance does not always correspond to reality. Subjects were 29 great apes (bonobos [Pan paniscus], chimpanzees [Pan troglodytes], gorillas [Gorilla gorilla], and orangutans [Pongo abelii]) and 24 2½-year-old children. In our task, we occluded portions of 1 large and 1 small food stick such that the size relations seemed reversed. Subjects could then choose which one they wanted. There was 1 control condition and 2 experimental conditions (administered within subjects). In the control condition subjects saw only the apparent stick sizes, whereas in the 2 experimental conditions they saw the true stick sizes as well (the difference between them being what the subjects saw first: the apparent or the real stick sizes). All great ape species and children successfully identified the bigger stick, despite its smaller appearance, in the experimental conditions, but not in the control. We discuss these results in relation to the understanding of object permanence and conservation, and exclude reversed reward contingency learning as an explanation.

摘要

研究人员对非人类的大猩猩和人类儿童进行了测试,以了解他们是否明白表象并不总是与现实相符。实验对象包括29只大猩猩(倭黑猩猩、黑猩猩、大猩猩和红毛猩猩)和24名2.5岁的儿童。在我们的实验任务中,我们遮挡了1根大的和1根小的食物棒的部分,使得它们的大小关系看起来颠倒了。然后,实验对象可以选择他们想要的那根。实验设置了1个控制条件和2个实验条件(在实验对象内部进行)。在控制条件下,实验对象只看到了食物棒的表观大小,而在2个实验条件下,他们也看到了食物棒的真实大小(两者的区别在于实验对象首先看到的是什么:表观大小还是真实大小)。在实验条件下,所有大猩猩物种和儿童都成功地识别出了较大的食物棒,尽管它看起来较小,但在控制条件下却做不到。我们结合对客体永久性和守恒性的理解来讨论这些结果,并排除了反向奖励偶然性学习作为一种解释。

相似文献

1
All great ape species (Gorilla gorilla, Pan paniscus, Pan troglodytes, Pongo abelii) and two-and-a-half-year-old children (Homo sapiens) discriminate appearance from reality.所有的大猩猩物种(西部大猩猩、倭黑猩猩、黑猩猩、苏门答腊猩猩)以及两岁半的儿童(智人)都能区分表象与现实。
J Comp Psychol. 2014 Nov;128(4):431-9. doi: 10.1037/a0037385. Epub 2014 Aug 25.
2
Tracking the displacement of objects: a series of tasks with great apes (Pan troglodytes, Pan paniscus, Gorilla gorilla, and Pongo pygmaeus) and young children (Homo sapiens).追踪物体的位移:对大猩猩(黑猩猩、倭黑猩猩、大猩猩和红毛猩猩)和幼儿(智人)进行的一系列任务。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2006 Jul;32(3):239-52. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.32.3.239.
3
Direct and indirect reputation formation in nonhuman great apes (Pan paniscus, Pan troglodytes, Gorilla gorilla, Pongo pygmaeus) and human children (Homo sapiens).非人类的大型猿类(倭黑猩猩、黑猩猩、大猩猩、红毛猩猩)和人类儿童(智人)中直接和间接声誉的形成。
J Comp Psychol. 2013 Feb;127(1):63-75. doi: 10.1037/a0028929. Epub 2012 Jul 2.
4
How the great apes (Pan troglodytes, Pongo pygmaeus, Pan paniscus, Gorilla gorilla) perform on the reversed reward contingency task II: transfer to new quantities, long-term retention, and the impact of quantity ratios.大猩猩(黑猩猩、红毛猩猩、倭黑猩猩、大猩猩)在反向奖励 contingency 任务 II 中的表现:向新数量的转移、长期保持以及数量比率的影响。
J Comp Psychol. 2008 May;122(2):204-12. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.122.2.204.
5
Token transfers among great apes (Gorilla gorilla, Pongo pygmaeus, Pan paniscus, and Pan troglodytes): species differences, gestural requests, and reciprocal exchange.大猩猩(西部大猩猩、婆罗洲猩猩、倭黑猩猩和黑猩猩)之间的代币转移:物种差异、手势请求和互惠交换。
J Comp Psychol. 2009 Nov;123(4):375-84. doi: 10.1037/a0017253.
6
How the great apes (Pan troglodytes, Pongo pygmaeus, Pan paniscus, and Gorilla gorilla) perform on the reversed contingency task: the effects of food quantity and food visibility.大猩猩(黑猩猩、红毛猩猩、倭黑猩猩和大猩猩)在反向 contingency 任务中的表现:食物数量和食物可见性的影响。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2006 Jan;32(1):60-70. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.32.1.60.
7
Apes (Gorilla gorilla, Pan paniscus, P. troglodytes, Pongo abelii) versus corvids (Corvus corax, C. corone) in a support task: the effect of pattern and functionality.在一项支持任务中猿类(大猩猩、倭黑猩猩、黑猩猩、苏门答腊猩猩)与鸦科鸟类(渡鸦、小嘴乌鸦)的比较:图案和功能性的影响
J Comp Psychol. 2012 Nov;126(4):355-67. doi: 10.1037/a0028050. Epub 2012 Apr 30.
8
Prior experience mediates the usage of food items as tools in great apes (Pan paniscus, Pan troglodytes, Gorilla gorilla, and Pongo abelii).先前的经验影响了大型猿类(黑猩猩、普通大猩猩、山地大猩猩和苏门答腊猩猩)将食物用作工具的行为。
J Comp Psychol. 2021 Feb;135(1):64-73. doi: 10.1037/com0000236. Epub 2020 May 28.
9
Great apes (Pan paniscus, Pan troglodytes, Gorilla gorilla, Pongo abelii) follow visual trails to locate hidden food.大猩猩(倭黑猩猩、黑猩猩、大猩猩、苏门答腊猩猩)通过视觉线索来寻找隐藏的食物。
J Comp Psychol. 2014 May;128(2):199-208. doi: 10.1037/a0035434.
10
Great apes and children infer causal relations from patterns of variation and covariation.大猩猩和儿童通过变异和共变模式推断因果关系。
Cognition. 2016 Oct;155:30-43. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.06.009. Epub 2016 Jun 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Canine perspective-taking.犬类换位思考能力。
Anim Cogn. 2023 Jan;26(1):275-298. doi: 10.1007/s10071-022-01736-z. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
2
Intuitive optics: what great apes infer from mirrors and shadows.直观光学:大猩猩从镜子和影子中推断出的信息。
Anim Cogn. 2018 Jul;21(4):493-512. doi: 10.1007/s10071-018-1184-0. Epub 2018 May 2.
3
Differing views: Can chimpanzees do Level 2 perspective-taking?不同观点:黑猩猩能进行二级视角采择吗?
Anim Cogn. 2016 May;19(3):555-64. doi: 10.1007/s10071-016-0956-7. Epub 2016 Feb 6.
4
Smoke and mirrors: Testing the scope of chimpanzees' appearance-reality understanding.烟雾与镜子:检验黑猩猩对表象与现实理解的范围。
Cognition. 2016 May;150:53-67. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.01.012. Epub 2016 Feb 2.