• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

先前的经验影响了大型猿类(黑猩猩、普通大猩猩、山地大猩猩和苏门答腊猩猩)将食物用作工具的行为。

Prior experience mediates the usage of food items as tools in great apes (Pan paniscus, Pan troglodytes, Gorilla gorilla, and Pongo abelii).

机构信息

Department of Developmental and Comparative Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.

School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St Andrews.

出版信息

J Comp Psychol. 2021 Feb;135(1):64-73. doi: 10.1037/com0000236. Epub 2020 May 28.

DOI:10.1037/com0000236
PMID:32463250
Abstract

Humans use tools with specific functions to solve tasks more efficiently. However, functional specialization often comes at a cost: It can hinder the production of actions that are not usually performed with those tools, thus resulting in a fixation effect (functional fixedness). Little is known about whether our closest living relatives, the nonhuman great apes, are vulnerable to this detrimental effect of experience. We examined whether great apes from 4 species ( = 35) would become fixated on the familiar action with an object. More precisely, some subjects experienced a novel food item (grissini), either whole or broken into pieces, whereas others did not. Then, subjects faced a task that required them to use the food item to rake in an out-of-reach food reward. Results indicated that all 4 species could use a food item as a tool. Apes were more likely to do so in the first trial when they had not experienced the tool as food before, even though they tasted the food before using it as a tool. Orangutans and bonobos used the food item more often as a tool than chimpanzees. A preference test ruled out that performance was dependent on individual or species food preferences. Our results suggest that apes might have represented one object in two different ways (i.e., as "food" and as "tool") and then became fixated on one of these two representations. However, it is unclear whether the fixation occurred because of the item's prior function or its identity. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

人类使用具有特定功能的工具来更有效地解决任务。然而,功能专业化通常需要付出代价:它可能会阻碍通常不使用这些工具进行的行动的产生,从而导致固定效应(功能固着)。目前还不清楚我们最亲近的亲属——非人类的大猿类是否容易受到这种经验的不利影响。我们研究了来自 4 个物种的大猿(=35)是否会对熟悉的物体动作产生固定效应。更确切地说,一些被试体验了一种新的食物(grissini),要么是完整的,要么是碎成了块,而其他被试则没有。然后,被试面临一项任务,需要他们使用食物来耙出远处的食物奖励。结果表明,所有 4 个物种都可以使用食物作为工具。当它们以前没有把工具当作食物使用过,而仅仅是品尝过食物之前,所有的 4 个物种都更有可能在第一次试验中使用食物作为工具。猩猩和倭黑猩猩比黑猩猩更常把食物当作工具来使用。偏好测试排除了表现取决于个体或物种的食物偏好的可能性。我们的结果表明,猿类可能已经用两种不同的方式来表示一个物体(即“食物”和“工具”),然后就会固定在这两种表示方式中的一种上。然而,目前还不清楚这种固定是由于物品的先前功能还是其身份造成的。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2021 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
Prior experience mediates the usage of food items as tools in great apes (Pan paniscus, Pan troglodytes, Gorilla gorilla, and Pongo abelii).先前的经验影响了大型猿类(黑猩猩、普通大猩猩、山地大猩猩和苏门答腊猩猩)将食物用作工具的行为。
J Comp Psychol. 2021 Feb;135(1):64-73. doi: 10.1037/com0000236. Epub 2020 May 28.
2
Great apes (Pan troglodytes, Pan paniscus, Pongo abelii) exploit better the information of failure than capuchin monkeys (Sapajus spp.) when selecting tools to solve the same foraging problem.在选择工具解决相同觅食问题时,大猩猩(黑猩猩、倭黑猩猩、苏门答腊猩猩)比卷尾猴(卷尾猴属)能更好地利用失败信息。
J Comp Psychol. 2021 May;135(2):273-279. doi: 10.1037/com0000242. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
3
The limits of endowment effects in great apes (Pan paniscus, Pan troglodytes, Gorilla gorilla, Pongo pygmaeus).大型猿类(矮黑猩猩、黑猩猩、大猩猩、红毛猩猩)禀赋效应的局限性
J Comp Psychol. 2011 Nov;125(4):436-45. doi: 10.1037/a0024516. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
4
The "avoid the empty cup" hypothesis does not explain great apes' (Gorilla gorilla, Pan paniscus, Pan troglodytes, Pongo abelii) responses in two three-cup one-item inference by exclusion tasks.“避免空杯”假说无法解释大猩猩(Gorilla gorilla、Pan paniscus、Pan troglodytes、Pongo abelii)在两项三项一杯一物品排除推理任务中的反应。
J Comp Psychol. 2022 Aug;136(3):172-188. doi: 10.1037/com0000321. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
5
No evidence of what-where-when memory in great apes (Pan troglodytes, Pan paniscus, Pongo abelii, and Gorilla gorilla).在大型猿类(黑猩猩、倭黑猩猩、猩猩和大猩猩)中没有关于什么-哪里-何时记忆的证据。
J Comp Psychol. 2020 May;134(2):252-261. doi: 10.1037/com0000215. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
6
The interplay of prior experience and motivation in great ape problem-solving (Gorilla gorilla, Pan paniscus, Pan troglodytes, and Pongo abelii).大猩猩(西部大猩猩、倭黑猩猩、黑猩猩和苏门答腊猩猩)解决问题过程中先前经验与动机的相互作用。
J Comp Psychol. 2018 Aug;132(3):294-305. doi: 10.1037/com0000117. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
7
All great ape species (Gorilla gorilla, Pan paniscus, Pan troglodytes, Pongo abelii) and two-and-a-half-year-old children (Homo sapiens) discriminate appearance from reality.所有的大猩猩物种(西部大猩猩、倭黑猩猩、黑猩猩、苏门答腊猩猩)以及两岁半的儿童(智人)都能区分表象与现实。
J Comp Psychol. 2014 Nov;128(4):431-9. doi: 10.1037/a0037385. Epub 2014 Aug 25.
8
How the great apes (Pan troglodytes, Pongo pygmaeus, Pan paniscus, Gorilla gorilla) perform on the reversed reward contingency task II: transfer to new quantities, long-term retention, and the impact of quantity ratios.大猩猩(黑猩猩、红毛猩猩、倭黑猩猩、大猩猩)在反向奖励 contingency 任务 II 中的表现:向新数量的转移、长期保持以及数量比率的影响。
J Comp Psychol. 2008 May;122(2):204-12. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.122.2.204.
9
Understanding others' preferences: A comparison across primate species and human societies.理解他人的偏好:灵长类物种和人类社会的比较。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 17;19(1):e0295221. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295221. eCollection 2024.
10
Differences in between-reinforcer value modulate the selective-value effect in great apes (Pan troglodytes, P. Paniscus, Gorilla gorilla, Pongo abelii).强化物之间的价值差异调节了大猩猩(黑猩猩、倭黑猩猩、大猩猩、苏门答腊猩猩)的选择性价值效应。
J Comp Psychol. 2016 Feb;130(1):1-12. doi: 10.1037/com0000014. Epub 2015 Oct 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Insights into conscious cognitive information processing.对有意识认知信息处理的见解。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2024 Jul 25;18:1443161. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2024.1443161. eCollection 2024.
2
Functional fixedness in chimpanzees.黑猩猩的功能固着。
Sci Rep. 2024 May 28;14(1):12155. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-62685-w.
3
Tool mastering today - an interdisciplinary perspective.当今的工具掌握——跨学科视角。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jun 16;14:1191792. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1191792. eCollection 2023.
4
Ratcheting up tool innovation in Goffin's cockatoos (): The effect of contextually diverse prior experience.提升戈氏凤头鹦鹉的工具创新能力:情境多样的先前经验的影响
Ethology. 2023 Mar;129(3):133-145. doi: 10.1111/eth.13351. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
5
Innovative composite tool use by Goffin's cockatoos (Cacatua goffiniana).凤头鹦鹉(Cacatua goffiniana)创新的复合材料工具使用。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 27;12(1):1510. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-05529-9.
6
Current Understanding of the "Insight" Phenomenon Across Disciplines.跨学科对“洞察力”现象的当前理解。
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 15;12:791398. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.791398. eCollection 2021.
7
One Function One Tool? A Review on Mutual Exclusivity in Tool Use Learning in Human and Non-human Species.一种功能一种工具?关于人类和非人类物种工具使用学习中互斥性的综述。
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 23;12:603960. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.603960. eCollection 2021.
8
Raising the level: orangutans solve the floating peanut task without visual feedback.提高难度:猩猩在没有视觉反馈的情况下解决漂浮花生任务。
Primates. 2022 Jan;63(1):33-39. doi: 10.1007/s10329-021-00952-4. Epub 2021 Oct 16.