Molina Wilson R, Silva Igor N, Donalisio da Silva Rodrigo, Gustafson Diedra, Sehrt David, Kim Fernando J
Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Denver Health Medical Center, University of Colorado , School of Medicine, Denver, Colorado.
J Endourol. 2015 Feb;29(2):235-9. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0305. Epub 2014 Oct 10.
We established an ex vivo model to evaluate the temperature profile of the ureter during laser lithotripsy, the influence of irrigation on temperature, and thermal spread during lithotripsy with the holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser.
Two ex vivo models of Ovis aries urinary tract and human calcium oxalate calculi were used. The Open Ureteral Model was opened longitudinally to measure the thermal profile of the urothelium. On the Clinical Model, anterograde ureteroscopy was performed in an intact urinary system. Temperatures were measured on the external portion of the ureter and the urothelium during lithotripsy and intentional perforation. The lithotripsy group (n=20) was divided into irrigated (n=10) and nonirrigated (n=10), which were compared for thermal spread length and values during laser activation. The intentional perforation group (n=10) was evaluated under saline flow. The Ho:YAG laser with a 365 μm laser fiber and power at 10W was used (1J/Pulse at 10 Hz). Infrared Fluke Ti55 Thermal Imager was used for evaluation. Maximum temperature values were recorded and compared.
On the Clinical Model, the external ureteral wall obtained a temperature of 37.4°C±2.5° and 49.5°C±2.3° (P=0.003) and in the Open Ureteral Model, 49.7°C and 112.4°C with and without irrigation, respectively (P<0.05). The thermal spread along the external ureter wall was not statically significant with or without irrigation (P=0.065). During intentional perforation, differences in temperatures were found between groups (opened with and without irrigation): 81.8°±8.8° and 145.0°±15.0°, respectively (P<0.005).
There is an increase in the external ureteral temperature during laser activation, but ureteral thermal values decreased when saline flow was applied. Ureter thermal spread showed no difference between irrigated and nonirrigated subgroups. This is the first laser lithotripsy thermography study establishing the framework to evaluate the temperature profile in the future.
我们建立了一种体外模型,以评估钬激光碎石术期间输尿管的温度分布、冲洗对温度的影响以及碎石术中的热扩散情况。
使用两种绵羊尿路和人草酸钙结石的体外模型。开放输尿管模型纵向切开以测量尿路上皮的热分布。在临床模型上,在完整的泌尿系统中进行顺行输尿管镜检查。在碎石术和故意穿孔期间,测量输尿管外部和尿路上皮的温度。碎石术组(n = 20)分为冲洗组(n = 10)和非冲洗组(n = 10),比较激光激活期间的热扩散长度和数值。故意穿孔组(n = 10)在盐水流动下进行评估。使用带有365μm激光光纤且功率为10W的钬激光(10Hz时1J/脉冲)。使用红外福禄克Ti55热成像仪进行评估。记录并比较最高温度值。
在临床模型上,输尿管外壁温度分别为37.4°C±2.5°和49.5°C±2.3°(P = 0.003);在开放输尿管模型中,有冲洗和无冲洗时分别为49.7°C和112.4°C(P<0.05)。无论有无冲洗,沿输尿管外壁的热扩散在统计学上均无显著差异(P = 0.065)。在故意穿孔期间,各组之间(有冲洗和无冲洗时切开)的温度存在差异:分别为81.8°±8.8°和145.0°±15.0°(P<0.005)。
激光激活期间输尿管外部温度升高,但施加盐水冲洗时输尿管热数值降低。冲洗组和非冲洗亚组之间输尿管热扩散无差异。这是第一项建立未来评估温度分布框架的激光碎石术热成像研究。