• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Evaluation of measurement equivalence of the Family Satisfaction with the End-of-Life Care in an ethnically diverse cohort: tests of differential item functioning.不同种族队列中家庭对临终关怀满意度测量等效性的评估:差异项目功能测试
Palliat Med. 2015 Jan;29(1):83-96. doi: 10.1177/0269216314545802. Epub 2014 Aug 26.
2
Evaluation of measurement equivalence of the Family Satisfaction with the End-of-Life Care (FAMCARE): Tests of differential item functioning between Hispanic and non-Hispanic White caregivers.评估临终关怀家庭满意度(FAMCARE)的测量等效性:对西班牙裔和非西班牙裔白种人护理者之间的差异项目功能的测试。
Palliat Support Care. 2020 Oct;18(5):544-556. doi: 10.1017/S1478951520000152.
3
Measurement Equivalence of the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference Short Form Items: Application to Ethnically Diverse Cancer and Palliative Care Populations.患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)疼痛干扰简表条目的测量等效性:在不同种族癌症和姑息治疗人群中的应用。
Psychol Test Assess Model. 2016;58(2):309-352.
4
Measurement Equivalence of the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety Short Forms in Ethnically Diverse Groups.患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)焦虑简表在不同种族群体中的测量等效性
Psychol Test Assess Model. 2016;58(1):183-219.
5
Psychometric Properties and Performance of the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Depression Short Forms in Ethnically Diverse Groups.患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)抑郁简表在不同种族群体中的心理测量特性及表现
Psychol Test Assess Model. 2016;58(1):141-181.
6
Measurement Equivalence of the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Applied Cognition - General Concerns, Short Forms in Ethnically Diverse Groups.患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)应用认知量表在不同种族群体中的测量等效性——一般问题及简表
Psychol Test Assess Model. 2016;58(2):255-307.
7
Use of an Item Bank to Develop Two Short-Form FAMCARE Scales to Measure Family Satisfaction With Care in the Setting of Serious Illness.使用题库开发两个简版FAMCARE量表,以衡量重病背景下家庭对护理的满意度。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015 May;49(5):894-903.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.10.017. Epub 2014 Dec 27.
8
Examination of the Measurement Equivalence of the Functional Assessment in Acute Care MCAT (FAMCAT) Mobility Item Bank Using Differential Item Functioning Analyses.使用差异项目功能分析检验急性护理 MCAT(FAMCAT)移动项目库中功能评估的测量等效性。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 May;103(5S):S84-S107.e38. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.03.044. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
9
Evaluating measurement equivalence using the item response theory log-likelihood ratio (IRTLR) method to assess differential item functioning (DIF): applications (with illustrations) to measures of physical functioning ability and general distress.使用项目反应理论对数似然比(IRTLR)方法评估测量等价性,以评估项目功能差异(DIF):身体功能能力和一般痛苦测量的应用(附说明)
Qual Life Res. 2007;16 Suppl 1:43-68. doi: 10.1007/s11136-007-9186-4. Epub 2007 May 5.
10
Development and psychometric characteristics of the SCI-QOL Ability to Participate and Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities item banks and short forms.《脊髓损伤生活质量量表参与能力及对社会角色与活动满意度项目库和简表的开发与心理测量学特征》
J Spinal Cord Med. 2015 May;38(3):397-408. doi: 10.1179/2045772315Y.0000000028.

引用本文的文献

1
The Rasch Analysis Shows Poor Construct Validity and Low Reliability of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology 2.0 (QUEST 2.0) Questionnaire.Rasch 分析表明,魁北克辅助技术满意度用户评估 2.0(QUEST 2.0)问卷的结构效度差,信度低。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 6;20(2):1036. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021036.
2
Evaluation of measurement equivalence of the Family Satisfaction with the End-of-Life Care (FAMCARE): Tests of differential item functioning between Hispanic and non-Hispanic White caregivers.评估临终关怀家庭满意度(FAMCARE)的测量等效性:对西班牙裔和非西班牙裔白种人护理者之间的差异项目功能的测试。
Palliat Support Care. 2020 Oct;18(5):544-556. doi: 10.1017/S1478951520000152.
3
Psychometric Properties of a Spanish-Language Version of a Short-Form FAMCARE: Applications to Caregivers of Patients With Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias.一种短式 FAMCARE 西班牙语版的心理计量特性:适用于阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆患者的照护者。
J Fam Nurs. 2019 Nov;25(4):557-589. doi: 10.1177/1074840719867345. Epub 2019 Aug 17.
4
The Use of a Brief 5-Item Measure of Family Satisfaction as a Critical Quality Indicator in Advanced Cancer Care: A Multisite Comparison.在晚期癌症护理中使用简短的5项家庭满意度量表作为关键质量指标:多中心比较
J Palliat Med. 2017 Jul;20(7):716-721. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2016.0442. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
5
The Spectrum of Caregiving in Palliative Care for Serious, Advanced, Rare Diseases: Key Issues and Research Directions.重症、晚期、罕见病姑息治疗中的照护范围:关键问题与研究方向
J Palliat Med. 2016 Jul;19(7):698-705. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2015.0464. Epub 2016 Jun 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Performance of the Family Satisfaction with the End-of-Life Care (FAMCARE) measure in an ethnically diverse cohort: psychometric analyses using item response theory.在一个种族多样化的队列中,使用项目反应理论对家庭对临终关怀满意度(FAMCARE)测量的表现进行心理计量学分析。
Support Care Cancer. 2014 Feb;22(2):399-408. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-1988-z. Epub 2013 Oct 5.
2
Invited Paper: The Rediscovery of Bifactor Measurement Models.特邀论文:双因素测量模型的重新发现
Multivariate Behav Res. 2012 Sep 1;47(5):667-696. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2012.715555.
3
The relatives' perspective on advanced cancer care in Denmark. A cross-sectional survey.丹麦的晚期癌症护理中的亲属视角。一项横断面调查。
Support Care Cancer. 2012 Dec;20(12):3179-88. doi: 10.1007/s00520-012-1454-3. Epub 2012 Apr 15.
4
Bifactor models and rotations: exploring the extent to which multidimensional data yield univocal scale scores.双因子模型和旋转:探索多维数据产生单一尺度分数的程度。
J Pers Assess. 2010 Nov;92(6):544-59. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2010.496477.
5
Reliability testing of the FAMCARE-2 scale: measuring family carer satisfaction with palliative care.FAMCARE-2 量表的信度测试:测量家庭护理人员对姑息治疗的满意度。
Palliat Med. 2010 Oct;24(7):674-81. doi: 10.1177/0269216310373166. Epub 2010 Jul 9.
6
The adequacy of chronic pain management prior to presenting at a tertiary care pain center: the role of patient socio-demographic characteristics.在前往三级护理疼痛中心就诊之前,慢性疼痛管理的充分性:患者社会人口统计学特征的作用。
J Pain. 2010 Aug;11(8):746-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2009.11.003.
7
Caregiver satisfaction with out-patient oncology services: utility of the FAMCARE instrument and development of the FAMCARE-6.照顾者对门诊肿瘤服务的满意度:FAMCARE 工具的效用和 FAMCARE-6 的开发。
Support Care Cancer. 2011 Apr;19(4):565-72. doi: 10.1007/s00520-010-0858-1. Epub 2010 Mar 28.
8
Factor analysis and internal consistency evaluation of the FAMCARE scale for use in the long-term care setting.家庭关怀评估量表在长期护理环境中的因子分析及内部一致性评估。
Palliat Support Care. 2010 Jun;8(2):169-76. doi: 10.1017/S1478951509990927. Epub 2010 Mar 24.
9
Race, ethnicity, and pain among the U.S. adult population.美国成年人口中的种族、族裔与疼痛
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2010 Feb;21(1):177-220. doi: 10.1353/hpu.0.0255.
10
On the Use, the Misuse, and the Very Limited Usefulness of Cronbach's Alpha.论克朗巴哈α系数的使用、误用及非常有限的实用性。
Psychometrika. 2009 Mar;74(1):107-120. doi: 10.1007/s11336-008-9101-0. Epub 2008 Dec 11.

不同种族队列中家庭对临终关怀满意度测量等效性的评估:差异项目功能测试

Evaluation of measurement equivalence of the Family Satisfaction with the End-of-Life Care in an ethnically diverse cohort: tests of differential item functioning.

作者信息

Teresi Jeanne A, Ocepek-Welikson Katja, Ramirez Mildred, Kleinman Marjorie, Ornstein Katherine, Siu Albert

机构信息

Research Division, The Hebrew Home at Riverdale, Riverdale, NY, USA Measurement and Data Management Core, Mount Sinai Pepper Older Americans Independence Center, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY, USA Columbia University Stroud Center, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA.

Research Division, The Hebrew Home at Riverdale, Riverdale, NY, USA.

出版信息

Palliat Med. 2015 Jan;29(1):83-96. doi: 10.1177/0269216314545802. Epub 2014 Aug 26.

DOI:10.1177/0269216314545802
PMID:25160692
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4822822/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Family Satisfaction with End-of-Life Care is an internationally used measure of satisfaction with cancer care. However, the Family Satisfaction with End-of-Life Care has not been studied for equivalence of item endorsement across different socio-demographic groups using differential item functioning.

AIMS

The aims of this secondary data analysis were (1) to examine potential differential item functioning in the family satisfaction item set with respect to type of caregiver, race, and patient age, gender, and education and (2) to provide parameters and documentation of differential item functioning for an item bank.

DESIGN

A mixed qualitative and quantitative analysis was conducted. A priori hypotheses regarding potential group differences in item response were established. Item response theory and Wald tests were used for the analyses of differential item functioning, accompanied by magnitude and impact measures.

RESULTS

Very little significant differential item functioning was observed for patient's age and gender. For race, 13 items showed differential item functioning after multiple comparison adjustment, 10 with non-uniform differential item functioning. No items evidenced differential item functioning of high magnitude, and the impact was negligible. For education, 5 items evidenced uniform differential item functioning after adjustment, none of high magnitude. Differential item functioning impact was trivial. One item evidenced differential item functioning for the caregiver relationship variable.

CONCLUSION

Differential item functioning was observed primarily for race and education. No differential item functioning of high magnitude was observed for any item, and the overall impact of differential item functioning was negligible. One item, satisfaction with "the patient's pain relief," might be singled out for further study, given that this item was both hypothesized and observed to show differential item functioning for race and education.

摘要

背景

《临终关怀家庭满意度》是一项国际上用于衡量癌症护理满意度的指标。然而,尚未使用项目功能差异法研究不同社会人口学群体在《临终关怀家庭满意度》项目认可方面的等效性。

目的

本次二次数据分析的目的是:(1)研究家庭满意度项目集中在照顾者类型、种族、患者年龄、性别和教育程度方面潜在的项目功能差异;(2)为题库提供项目功能差异的参数和文档。

设计

进行了定性与定量相结合的分析。建立了关于项目反应潜在群体差异的先验假设。使用项目反应理论和Wald检验分析项目功能差异,并辅以大小和影响度量。

结果

在患者年龄和性别方面,几乎未观察到显著的项目功能差异。对于种族,13个项目在多重比较调整后显示出项目功能差异,其中10个具有非一致的项目功能差异。没有项目显示出高程度的项目功能差异,影响可忽略不计。对于教育程度,5个项目在调整后显示出一致的项目功能差异,均未达到高程度。项目功能差异的影响微不足道。有一个项目在照顾者关系变量上显示出项目功能差异。

结论

主要在种族和教育程度方面观察到项目功能差异。未观察到任何项目有高程度的项目功能差异,项目功能差异的总体影响可忽略不计。鉴于“患者疼痛缓解”这一项目在种族和教育程度方面既有假设又被观察到显示出项目功能差异,可能值得进一步研究。