Arribere Joshua A, Bell Ryan T, Fu Becky X H, Artiles Karen L, Hartman Phil S, Fire Andrew Z
Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305
Department of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305.
Genetics. 2014 Nov;198(3):837-46. doi: 10.1534/genetics.114.169730. Epub 2014 Aug 26.
Facilitated by recent advances using CRISPR/Cas9, genome editing technologies now permit custom genetic modifications in a wide variety of organisms. Ideally, modified animals could be both efficiently made and easily identified with minimal initial screening and without introducing exogenous sequence at the locus of interest or marker mutations elsewhere. To this end, we describe a coconversion strategy, using CRISPR/Cas9 in which screening for a dominant phenotypic oligonucleotide-templated conversion event at one locus can be used to enrich for custom modifications at another unlinked locus. After the desired mutation is identified among the F1 progeny heterozygous for the dominant marker mutation, F2 animals that have lost the marker mutation are picked to obtain the desired mutation in an unmarked genetic background. We have developed such a coconversion strategy for Caenorhabditis elegans, using a number of dominant phenotypic markers. Examining the coconversion at a second (unselected) locus of interest in the marked F1 animals, we observed that 14-84% of screened animals showed homologous recombination. By reconstituting the unmarked background through segregation of the dominant marker mutation at each step, we show that custom modification events can be carried out recursively, enabling multiple mutant animals to be made. While our initial choice of a coconversion marker [rol-6(su1006)] was readily applicable in a single round of coconversion, the genetic properties of this locus were not optimal in that CRISPR-mediated deletion mutations at the unselected rol-6 locus can render a fraction of coconverted strains recalcitrant to further rounds of similar mutagenesis. An optimal marker in this sense would provide phenotypic distinctions between the desired mutant/+ class and alternative +/+, mutant/null, null/null, and null/+ genotypes. Reviewing dominant alleles from classical C. elegans genetics, we identified one mutation in dpy-10 and one mutation in sqt-1 that meet these criteria and demonstrate that these too can be used as effective conversion markers. Coconversion was observed using a variety of donor molecules at the second (unselected) locus, including oligonucleotides, PCR products, and plasmids. We note that the coconversion approach described here could be applied in any of the variety of systems where suitable coconversion markers can be identified from previous intensive genetic analyses of gain-of-function alleles.
在使用CRISPR/Cas9的最新进展推动下,基因组编辑技术现在允许在多种生物体中进行定制的基因修饰。理想情况下,修饰动物既能高效制备,又能在最小程度的初始筛选下轻松识别,且不会在感兴趣的位点引入外源序列或在其他地方引入标记突变。为此,我们描述了一种共转化策略,使用CRISPR/Cas9,其中在一个位点筛选显性表型寡核苷酸模板化的转化事件可用于富集另一个不连锁位点的定制修饰。在F1后代中,对于显性标记突变杂合的个体中鉴定出所需突变后,挑选丢失标记突变的F2动物,以在无标记的遗传背景中获得所需突变。我们利用一些显性表型标记,为秀丽隐杆线虫开发了这样一种共转化策略。在标记的F1动物中检查第二个(未选择的)感兴趣位点的共转化情况,我们观察到14%-84%的筛选动物显示出同源重组。通过在每个步骤中通过显性标记突变的分离来重建无标记背景,我们表明定制修饰事件可以递归进行,从而能够制备多个突变动物。虽然我们最初选择的共转化标记[rol-6(su1006)]很容易应用于一轮共转化,但该位点的遗传特性并非最佳,因为在未选择的rol-6位点上CRISPR介导的缺失突变可使一部分共转化菌株难以进行进一步轮次的类似诱变。从这个意义上讲,一个最佳标记将在所需突变体/+类与其他+/+、突变体/无、无/无和无/+基因型之间提供表型差异。回顾经典秀丽隐杆线虫遗传学中的显性等位基因,我们在dpy-10中鉴定出一个突变,在sqt-1中鉴定出一个突变,它们符合这些标准,并证明这些突变也可作为有效的转化标记。在第二个(未选择的)位点使用多种供体分子观察到了共转化,包括寡核苷酸、PCR产物和质粒。我们注意到,这里描述的共转化方法可以应用于任何能够从以前对功能获得性等位基因的深入遗传分析中鉴定出合适共转化标记的多种系统中。