Kotozaki Yuka, Takeuchi Hikaru, Sekiguchi Atsushi, Yamamoto Yuki, Shinada Takamitsu, Araki Tsuyoshi, Takahashi Kei, Taki Yasuyuki, Ogino Takeshi, Kiguchi Masashi, Kawashima Ryuta
Smart Ageing International Research Center, Institute of Development, Aging and Cancer, Tohoku University Sendai, Japan.
Division of Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, Institute of Development, Aging and Cancer, Tohoku University Sendai, Japan.
Brain Behav. 2014 Jul;4(4):566-79. doi: 10.1002/brb3.241. Epub 2014 Jun 15.
The day-to-day causes of stress are called daily hassles. Daily hassles are correlated with ill health. Biofeedback (BF) is one of the tools used for acquiring stress-coping skills. However, the anatomical correlates of the effects of BF with long training periods remain unclear. In this study, we aimed to investigate this.
PARTICIPANTS WERE ASSIGNED RANDOMLY TO TWO GROUPS: the intervention group and the control group. Participants in the intervention group performed a biofeedback training (BFT) task (a combination task for heart rate and cerebral blood flow control) every day, for about 5 min once a day. The study outcomes included MRI, psychological tests (e.g., Positive and Negative Affect Schedule, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, and Brief Job Stress Questionnaire), and a stress marker (salivary cortisol levels) before (day 0) and after (day 28) the intervention.
We observed significant improvements in the psychological test scores and salivary cortisol levels in the intervention group compared to the control group. Furthermore, voxel-based morphometric analysis revealed that compared to the control group, the intervention group had significantly increased regional gray matter (GM) volume in the right lateral orbitofrontal cortex, which is an anatomical cluster that includes mainly the left hippocampus, and the left subgenual anterior cingulate cortex. The GM regions are associated with the stress response, and, in general, these regions seem to be the most sensitive to the detrimental effects of stress.
Our findings suggest that our BFT is effective against the GM structures vulnerable to stress.
日常压力源被称为日常琐事。日常琐事与健康不佳相关。生物反馈(BF)是用于获得压力应对技能的工具之一。然而,长期训练的生物反馈效果的解剖学关联仍不清楚。在本研究中,我们旨在对此进行调查。
参与者被随机分为两组:干预组和对照组。干预组的参与者每天进行一次生物反馈训练(BFT)任务(心率和脑血流控制的组合任务),每次约5分钟。研究结果包括干预前(第0天)和干预后(第28天)的磁共振成像(MRI)、心理测试(如正负性情绪量表、流行病学研究中心抑郁量表和简短工作压力问卷)以及一种压力标志物(唾液皮质醇水平)。
与对照组相比,我们观察到干预组的心理测试分数和唾液皮质醇水平有显著改善。此外,基于体素的形态学分析显示,与对照组相比,干预组右侧眶额外侧皮质的区域灰质(GM)体积显著增加,该解剖簇主要包括左侧海马体和左侧膝下前扣带回皮质。GM区域与应激反应相关,一般来说,这些区域似乎对应激的有害影响最为敏感。
我们的研究结果表明,我们的BFT对易受压力影响的GM结构有效。