Liu Xiao-Feng, Hu Xiang-Shun, Keller Mike A, Zhao Hui-Yan, Wu Yun-Feng, Liu Tong-Xian
State Key Laboratory for Crop Stress Biology in Arid Areas, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, China; Key Laboratory of Crop Pest Management on the Northwest Loess Plateau, Ministry of Agriculture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, China.
Key Laboratory of Crop Pest Management on the Northwest Loess Plateau, Ministry of Agriculture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, China; School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, Waite Campus, the University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 3;9(9):e106639. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106639. eCollection 2014.
The tripartite interactions in a pathosystem involving wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), the Barley yellow dwarf virus (BYDV), and the BYDV vector aphid Sitobion avenae were studied under field conditions to determine the impact of these interactions on aphid populations, virus pathology and grain yield. Wheat varietal resistance to BYDV and aphids varied among the three wheat varieties studied over two consecutive years. The results demonstrated that (1) aphid peak number (APN) in the aphid + BYDV (viruliferous aphid) treatment was greater and occurred earlier than that in the non-viruliferous aphid treatment. The APN and the area under the curve of population dynamics (AUC) on a S. avenae-resistant variety 98-10-30 was significantly lower than on two aphid-susceptible varieties Tam200(13)G and Xiaoyan6. (2) The production of alatae (PA) was greater on the variety 98-10-30 than on the other varieties, and PA was greater in the aphid + BYDV treatment on 98-10-30 than in the non-viruliferous aphid treatment, but this trend was reversed on Tam200(13)G and Xiaoyan6. (3) The BYDV disease incidence (DIC) on the variety 98-10-30 was greater than that on the other two varieties in 2012, and the disease index (DID) on Tam200(13)G was lower than on the other varieties in the aphid + BYDV and BYDV treatments in 2012, but not in 2011 when aphid vector numbers were generally lower. (4) Yield loss in the aphid + BYDV treatment tended to be greater than that in the aphid or BYDV alone treatments across varieties and years. We suggested that aphid population development and BYDV transmission tend to promote each other under field conditions. The aphids + BYDV treatment caused greater yield reductions than non-viruliferous aphids or virus treatment. Wheat varietal resistance in 98-10-30 affects the aphid dispersal, virus transmission and wheat yield loss though inhibits aphid populations from increasing.
在田间条件下研究了涉及小麦(普通小麦)、大麦黄矮病毒(BYDV)和BYDV传毒介体麦长管蚜的病理系统中的三方相互作用,以确定这些相互作用对蚜虫种群、病毒病理学和谷物产量的影响。在连续两年研究的三个小麦品种中,小麦品种对BYDV和蚜虫的抗性各不相同。结果表明:(1)蚜虫+BYDV(带毒蚜虫)处理中的蚜虫峰值数量(APN)比无毒蚜虫处理中的更大且出现得更早。抗麦长管蚜品种98-10-30上的APN和种群动态曲线下面积(AUC)显著低于两个感蚜品种Tam200(13)G和小偃6号。(2)98-10-30品种上的有翅蚜产生量(PA)比其他品种上的更大,且98-10-30上蚜虫+BYDV处理中的PA比无毒蚜虫处理中的更大,但在Tam200(13)G和小偃6号上这种趋势相反。(3)2012年98-10-30品种上的BYDV发病率(DIC)高于其他两个品种,2012年Tam200(13)G在蚜虫+BYDV和BYDV处理中的病情指数(DID)低于其他品种,但在2011年蚜虫介体数量普遍较低时并非如此。(4)在不同品种和年份中,蚜虫+BYDV处理的产量损失往往大于单独蚜虫或BYDV处理的产量损失。我们认为,在田间条件下,蚜虫种群发展和BYDV传播往往相互促进。蚜虫+BYDV处理比无毒蚜虫或病毒处理导致更大的产量降低。98-10-30中的小麦品种抗性影响蚜虫扩散、病毒传播和小麦产量损失,尽管它抑制了蚜虫种群的增加。