Suppr超能文献

宾夕法尼亚大学嗅觉识别测试中文版在慢性鼻-鼻窦炎患者中的适用性验证。

Validation of the applicability of the traditional Chinese version of the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis.

作者信息

Jiang Rong-San, Kuo Li-Te, Wu Shang-Heng, Su Mao-Chang, Liang Kai-Li

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.

出版信息

Allergy Rhinol (Providence). 2014 Jan;5(1):28-35. doi: 10.2500/ar.2014.5.0084.

Abstract

The 40-item University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) is the most widely used smell test in the world. Presently, culturally modified versions of this test are available in multiple languages. A traditional Chinese version of the UPSIT (UPSIT-TC) has been developed for administration in Taiwan. The purpose of this study was to investigate the validity and reliability of the UPSIT-TC in Taiwanese patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). The phenylethyl alcohol (PEA) odor detection threshold test, the North American version of UPSIT (UPSIT-NA), and the UPSIT-TC were administered to 40 healthy subjects and to 100 CRS patients before and after functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). The UPSIT-TC showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.887, 0.886, and 0.870 at three test occasions) and test-retest reliability (p < 0.001). The scores of UPSIT-TC were significantly correlated to the PEA thresholds (p < 0.001). The UPSIT-TC scores were significantly higher than those of the UPSIT-NA (p = 0.028) when analysis was performed with logistic regression with independent variables including test occasions (before or after FESS), test methods (UPSIT-NA or UPSIT-TC), status of polyp (with or without), and PEA thresholds (improved or did not improve). In addition, there were significant between-group differences in UPSIT-TC scores including healthy versus CRS, CRS with polyps versus CRS without polyps, and PEA thresholds improved versus PEA thresholds which did not improve. The UPSIT-TC is reliable and valid for measuring olfactory function in Taiwanese patients with rhinosinusitis. In addition, the UPSIT-TC clearly resulted in better performance than that of UPSIT-NA.

摘要

40项的宾夕法尼亚大学嗅觉识别测试(UPSIT)是世界上使用最广泛的嗅觉测试。目前,该测试有多种语言的文化适应性版本。已经开发了传统中文版本的UPSIT(UPSIT-TC)用于台湾地区。本研究的目的是调查UPSIT-TC在台湾慢性鼻窦炎(CRS)患者中的有效性和可靠性。对40名健康受试者和100名CRS患者在功能性鼻内镜鼻窦手术(FESS)前后进行苯乙醇(PEA)气味检测阈值测试、北美版UPSIT(UPSIT-NA)和UPSIT-TC。UPSIT-TC显示出良好的内部一致性(三次测试时的Cronbach's alpha分别为0.887、0.886和0.870)和重测信度(p < 0.001)。UPSIT-TC的得分与PEA阈值显著相关(p < 0.001)。当进行逻辑回归分析,自变量包括测试时间(FESS前后)、测试方法(UPSIT-NA或UPSIT-TC)、息肉状态(有无)和PEA阈值(改善或未改善)时,UPSIT-TC的得分显著高于UPSIT-NA(p = 0.028)。此外,UPSIT-TC得分在组间存在显著差异,包括健康组与CRS组、有息肉的CRS组与无息肉 的CRS组,以及PEA阈值改善组与未改善组。UPSIT-TC在测量台湾鼻窦炎患者嗅觉功能方面是可靠且有效的。此外,UPSIT-TC的表现明显优于UPSIT-NA。

相似文献

4
Establishment of olfactory diagnosis for the traditional Chinese version of the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test.
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2016 Dec;6(12):1308-1314. doi: 10.1002/alr.21818. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
5
The effect of olfactory training on the odor threshold in patients with traumatic anosmia.
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2017 Sep 1;31(5):317-322. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2017.31.4466.
6
The effect of olfactory training on odor identification in patients with traumatic anosmia.
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2019 Nov;9(11):1244-1251. doi: 10.1002/alr.22409. Epub 2019 Aug 21.
10
Cross-culturally modified University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test for a Turkish population.
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2015 Sep-Oct;29(5):e138-41. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2015.29.4212.

引用本文的文献

1
Partial Middle Turbinate Resection Versus Preservation on Olfactory Function: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 Jan-Dec;54:19160216251351566. doi: 10.1177/19160216251351566. Epub 2025 Jun 27.
2
A Pilot Study of the Computerized Brief Smell Identification Test.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Sep 25;14(19):2121. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14192121.
5
Validation of the local applicability of the 'TIB' Olfactory Test Device in the era of COVID-19.
J Int Med Res. 2022 Jan;50(1):3000605211069281. doi: 10.1177/03000605211069281.
6
Investigation of Normative Value of Commercialized Taiwan Smell Identification Test.
Allergy Rhinol (Providence). 2021 Feb 15;12:2152656721991525. doi: 10.1177/2152656721991525. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
8
Validity and Reliability of Persian Smell Identification Test.
Iran J Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Mar;32(109):65-71. doi: 10.22038/ijorl.2019.35782.2180.
9
The association of bone, fingernail and blood manganese with cognitive and olfactory function in Chinese workers.
Sci Total Environ. 2019 May 20;666:1003-1010. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.208. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
10
The prevalence of olfactory dysfunction in chronic rhinosinusitis.
Laryngoscope. 2017 Feb;127(2):309-320. doi: 10.1002/lary.26316. Epub 2016 Nov 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Objective olfactory outcomes after revision endoscopic sinus surgery.
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2013 Jul-Aug;27(4):e96-100. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2013.27.3939.
2
Chapter 13: Olfactory disorders.
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2013 May-Jun;27 Suppl 1:S45-7. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2013.27.3898.
3
University of Pennsylvania smell identification test: application to Turkish population.
Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg. 2012 Mar-Apr;22(2):77-80. doi: 10.5606/kbbihtisas.2012.014.
5
Applying a new version of the Brazilian-Portuguese UPSIT smell test in Brazil.
Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2010 Oct;68(5):700-5. doi: 10.1590/s0004-282x2010000500005.
7
Preoperative prognostic factors for olfactory change after functional endoscopic sinus surgery.
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2009 Jan-Feb;23(1):64-70. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2009.23.3262.
9
Assessment of odor identification function in Asia using a modified "Sniffin' Stick" odor identification test.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2008 Jul;265(7):787-90. doi: 10.1007/s00405-007-0551-2. Epub 2007 Dec 7.
10
Cross-cultural application of the "Sniffin' Sticks" odor identification test.
Am J Rhinol. 2007 Sep-Oct;21(5):570-3. doi: 10.2500/ajr.2007.21.3075.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验