• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

宾夕法尼亚大学嗅觉识别测试:在土耳其人群中的应用。

University of Pennsylvania smell identification test: application to Turkish population.

作者信息

Yücepur Cemil, Ozücer Berke, Değirmenci Nazan, Yıldırım Yalçın, Veyseller Bayram, Ozturan Orhan

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology, Bezmiâlem Vakıf University, İstanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg. 2012 Mar-Apr;22(2):77-80. doi: 10.5606/kbbihtisas.2012.014.

DOI:10.5606/kbbihtisas.2012.014
PMID:22548263
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate whether UPSIT (The University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test) clinical olfactory function test is suitable to assess olfactory function in Turkish population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty healthy Turkish volunteers (21 males, 29 females; mean age 31.5±8.7 years; range 20 to 49 years) who underwent a detailed otorhinolaryngological examination were included in the study. Subjects with abnormal findings suggesting olfactory dysfunction were excluded from the study. UPSIT and Connecticut Chemosensory Clinical Research Center (CCCRC) tests were carried out for each individual separately.

RESULTS

Mean CCCRC test score was 6.3±0.6 out of 7. Ten volunteers scored between 5-5.75 were considered mild hyposmia, while 40 volunteers scored between 6-7 were evaluated as normosmic. Volunteers correctly identified 21.4±4.7 odors out of 40 odors in UPSIT test.

CONCLUSION

We concluded that UPSIT test is insufficient for the evaluation of olfactory function in Turkish population. Our results suggest that UPSIT test contains odors which are unfamiliar to Turkish population. Therefore, it is essential to either modify odors of UPSIT test or establish normative data suitable to Turkish population for evaluating the scores to avoid false olfactory function assessment.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在调查宾夕法尼亚大学嗅觉识别测试(UPSIT)临床嗅觉功能测试是否适用于评估土耳其人群的嗅觉功能。

患者与方法

本研究纳入了50名接受详细耳鼻喉科检查的健康土耳其志愿者(21名男性,29名女性;平均年龄31.5±8.7岁;年龄范围20至49岁)。有提示嗅觉功能障碍异常发现的受试者被排除在研究之外。对每位受试者分别进行UPSIT和康涅狄格化学感觉临床研究中心(CCCRC)测试。

结果

CCCRC测试平均得分为6.3±0.6(满分7分)。10名得分在5 - 5.75之间的志愿者被认为有轻度嗅觉减退,而40名得分在6 - 7之间的志愿者被评估为嗅觉正常。在UPSIT测试中,志愿者从40种气味中正确识别出21.4±4.7种气味。

结论

我们得出结论,UPSIT测试不足以评估土耳其人群的嗅觉功能。我们的结果表明,UPSIT测试中的气味是土耳其人群不熟悉的。因此,必须要么修改UPSIT测试的气味,要么建立适合土耳其人群的标准数据以评估分数,以避免嗅觉功能评估出现错误。

相似文献

1
University of Pennsylvania smell identification test: application to Turkish population.宾夕法尼亚大学嗅觉识别测试:在土耳其人群中的应用。
Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg. 2012 Mar-Apr;22(2):77-80. doi: 10.5606/kbbihtisas.2012.014.
2
Cross-culturally modified University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test for a Turkish population.针对土耳其人群对宾夕法尼亚大学嗅觉识别测试进行跨文化修改。
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2015 Sep-Oct;29(5):e138-41. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2015.29.4212.
3
Applicability of the cross-culturally modified University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test in a Japanese population.跨文化改良版宾夕法尼亚大学嗅觉识别测试在日本人群中的适用性。
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2011 Nov-Dec;25(6):404-10. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2011.25.3658.
4
Utility of a three-item smell identification test in detecting olfactory dysfunction.三项嗅觉识别测试在检测嗅觉功能障碍中的效用。
Laryngoscope. 2005 Dec;115(12):2209-12. doi: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000183194.17484.bb.
5
A pilot study of a traditional Chinese version of the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test for application in Taiwan.一项宾夕法尼亚大学嗅觉识别测试中文版在台湾应用的初步研究。
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2010 Jan-Feb;24(1):45-50. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2010.24.3388.
6
Development of normative data for the Brazilian adaptation of the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test.巴西版宾夕法尼亚大学嗅觉识别测试常模数据的制定。
Chem Senses. 2015 Feb;40(2):141-9. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bju068. Epub 2014 Dec 29.
7
Application of the University Of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (traditional Chinese version) for detecting olfactory deficits in early Parkinson's disease in a Taiwanese cohort.应用宾夕法尼亚大学嗅觉识别测试(繁体中文版)检测台湾人群早期帕金森病的嗅觉缺陷。
J Parkinsons Dis. 2014;4(2):175-80. doi: 10.3233/JPD-130309.
8
A study of 30 odors panel smell identification test, smell detection threshold and University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) in Thailand.对泰国 30 种气味嗅辨测试、嗅敏度测试和宾夕法尼亚大学嗅敏度测试(UPSIT)的研究。
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2020 Dec;47(6):1003-1008. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2020.05.017. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
9
Characterization of the sniff magnitude test.嗅觉强度测试的特征描述。
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006 May;132(5):532-6. doi: 10.1001/archotol.132.5.532.
10
The Candy Smell Test in clinical routine.临床常规中的糖果气味测试。
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2011 Jul-Aug;25(4):e145-8. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2011.25.3611.

引用本文的文献

1
Olfactory Dysfunction in Adults from Rio Grande do Norte: A Cross-Sectional Study.巴伊亚州成年人的嗅觉功能障碍:一项横断面研究。 需注意,你原文中的“Rio Grande do Norte”有误,根据你提供的任务信息推测你可能想说的是“Rio Grande do Sul”,若如此,正确译文为:南里奥格兰德州成年人的嗅觉功能障碍:一项横断面研究。
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Feb 5;28(2):e326-e331. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1777448. eCollection 2024 Apr.
2
Cross-cultural modification of the University of Pennsylvania smell identification test for the Saudi Arabian population: Validation and normative values.宾夕法尼亚大学嗅觉识别测试在沙特阿拉伯人群中的跨文化修订:验证和常模值。
Saudi Med J. 2024 Jan;45(1):79-85. doi: 10.15537/smj.2024.45.1.20230422.
3
Odor familiarity and improvement of olfactory identification test in Chinese population.
气味熟悉度与中国人群嗅觉识别测试的改善
Front Psychol. 2023 Oct 16;14:1278668. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1278668. eCollection 2023.
4
Updated Percentiles for the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test in Adults 50 Years of Age and Older.宾夕法尼亚大学嗅觉识别测试成人(50 岁及以上)更新百分位数。
Neurology. 2023 Apr 18;100(16):e1691-e1701. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207077. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
5
Association Between Satisfaction with Nasal Appearance and Olfactory Function in Patients Undergoing Septorhinoplasty Surgery.鼻中隔成形术后患者对鼻外观满意度与嗅觉功能的关系。
Arch Iran Med. 2022 May 1;25(5):314-318. doi: 10.34172/aim.2022.51.
6
Sex Differences in Human Olfaction: A Meta-Analysis.人类嗅觉中的性别差异:一项荟萃分析。
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 13;10:242. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00242. eCollection 2019.
7
Effect of Septorhinoplasty on Olfactory Function: Assessment Using the Brief Smell Identification Test.鼻中隔成形术对嗅觉功能的影响:使用简易嗅觉识别测试进行评估
Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Mar;53(1):4-9. doi: 10.5152/tao.2015.694. Epub 2015 Mar 1.
8
Validation of the applicability of the traditional Chinese version of the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis.宾夕法尼亚大学嗅觉识别测试中文版在慢性鼻-鼻窦炎患者中的适用性验证。
Allergy Rhinol (Providence). 2014 Jan;5(1):28-35. doi: 10.2500/ar.2014.5.0084.
9
The role of olfactory challenge tests in incipient dementia and clinical trial design.嗅觉挑战测试在早期痴呆症和临床试验设计中的作用。
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2014 Sep;14(9):479. doi: 10.1007/s11910-014-0479-z.
10
University of pennsylvania smell identification on Iranian population.宾夕法尼亚大学对伊朗人群的嗅觉识别研究。
Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2014 Jan;16(1):e7926. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.7926. Epub 2014 Jan 5.