• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

青少年时期男孩和女孩公平偏好的发展。

Development of equity preferences in boys and girls across adolescence.

作者信息

Meuwese Rosa, Crone Eveline A, de Rooij Mark, Güroğlu Berna

机构信息

Leiden University; Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition.

出版信息

Child Dev. 2015 Jan-Feb;86(1):145-58. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12290. Epub 2014 Sep 9.

DOI:10.1111/cdev.12290
PMID:25201449
Abstract

The aim of the current study was to examine the development of equity preferences across adolescence, for boys and girls separately. Participants from 8 to 18 years old (M = 14.09 years; N = 1,216) played four economic allocation games. Analyses revealed a decrease in equity preferences with age and this decrease was stronger for boys than for girls. There was also an age-related increase in the preference for efficient outcomes (i.e., maximization of total available resources), which was again stronger for boys than for girls. Overall, although equity remains as a strong social norm, adolescents are decreasingly strict in adhering to the equity norm and show increasing flexibility in equity preferences.

摘要

本研究的目的是分别考察男孩和女孩在整个青春期公平偏好的发展情况。8至18岁的参与者(M = 14.09岁;N = 1216)参与了四项经济分配游戏。分析显示,公平偏好随年龄增长而下降,且男孩的下降幅度比女孩更大。对有效结果(即可用资源总量最大化)的偏好也随年龄增长而增加,同样男孩的增加幅度比女孩更大。总体而言,尽管公平仍是一种强大的社会规范,但青少年在遵守公平规范方面越来越不严格,并且在公平偏好上表现出越来越大的灵活性。

相似文献

1
Development of equity preferences in boys and girls across adolescence.青少年时期男孩和女孩公平偏好的发展。
Child Dev. 2015 Jan-Feb;86(1):145-58. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12290. Epub 2014 Sep 9.
2
Pathways from maternal distress and child problem behavior to adolescent depressive symptoms: a prospective examination from early childhood to adolescence.从母亲困扰和儿童问题行为到青少年抑郁症状的途径:从幼儿期到青春期的前瞻性研究。
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2013 Jun;34(5):303-13. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0b013e318293ab05.
3
Gender differentiations of cognitive-motor functioning in prepubertal and pubertal children.青春期前和青春期儿童认知运动功能的性别差异。
Coll Antropol. 2012 Jun;36(2):563-72.
4
Network specialization during adolescence: Hippocampal effective connectivity in boys and girls.青少年时期的网络专业化:男孩和女孩的海马体有效连接。
Neuroimage. 2018 Jul 15;175:402-412. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.04.013. Epub 2018 Apr 9.
5
Changes in torso muscle endurance profiles in children aged 7 to 14 years: reference values.7 至 14 岁儿童躯干肌肉耐力特征的变化:参考值。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Dec;93(12):2295-301. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.12.023. Epub 2012 Apr 13.
6
Early androgens, activity levels and toy choices of children in the second year of life.儿童在生命第二年的早期雄激素、活动水平和玩具选择。
Horm Behav. 2012 Sep;62(4):500-4. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2012.08.008. Epub 2012 Aug 30.
7
[Age variability of anthropometric parameters of schoolchildren in the city of Nal'chik].[纳尔奇克市学童人体测量参数的年龄变异性]
Morfologiia. 2010;137(1):44-8.
8
Influence of the social and economical factors on the indicators of height and weight among the pupils, residents of the city and villages in eastern Georgia (Kakheti region).社会经济因素对格鲁吉亚东部(卡赫季地区)城市和乡村小学生身高体重指标的影响
Georgian Med News. 2012 Nov(212):53-8.
9
Age differences in executive functions within a sample of Brazilian children and adolescents.巴西儿童和青少年样本中执行功能的年龄差异。
Span J Psychol. 2013;16:E9. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2013.12.
10
A study of attitudes, health and social status of children (11-18 yrs.) in block Kathura, Rohtak.对罗塔克县卡图拉街区11至18岁儿童的态度、健康和社会状况的研究。
Indian J Matern Child Health. 1992 Jan-Mar;3(1):19-22.

引用本文的文献

1
Emotional engagement with close friends in adolescence predicts neural correlates of empathy in adulthood.青少年时期与亲密朋友的情感互动能预测成年期同理心的神经关联。
Soc Neurosci. 2024 Aug;19(4):246-258. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2024.2406863. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
2
Facing ostracism: micro-coding facial expressions in the Cyberball social exclusion paradigm.面对排斥:在“Cyberball”社交排斥范式中进行微观编码面部表情。
BMC Psychol. 2023 Jun 19;11(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01219-x.
3
Daily prosocial actions during the COVID-19 pandemic contribute to giving behavior in adolescence.
在 COVID-19 大流行期间,日常亲社会行为有助于青少年的利他行为。
Sci Rep. 2022 May 6;12(1):7458. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-11421-3.
4
Understanding the Dynamics of the Developing Adolescent Brain Through Team Science.通过团队科学了解青少年大脑发育的动态过程。
Front Integr Neurosci. 2022 Feb 22;16:827097. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2022.827097. eCollection 2022.
5
Cyberbullying and Empathy in the Age of Hyperconnection: An Interdisciplinary Approach.超连接时代的网络欺凌与同理心:一种跨学科方法
Front Sociol. 2020 Oct 16;5:551881. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2020.551881. eCollection 2020.
6
Developmental asymmetries in learning to adjust to cooperative and uncooperative environments.在适应合作和非合作环境方面的学习发展中的不对称性。
Sci Rep. 2020 Dec 10;10(1):21761. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-78546-1.
7
Corticostriatal connectivity is associated with the reduction of intergroup bias and greater impartial giving in youth.皮质纹状体连接与减少群体间偏见和促进青少年公平给予有关。
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2019 Jun;37:100628. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2019.100628. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
8
Giving to Friends, Classmates, and Strangers in Adolescence.青少年时期对朋友、同学和陌生人的给予行为。
J Res Adolesc. 2020 Feb;30 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):290-297. doi: 10.1111/jora.12491. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
9
The neural development of prosocial behavior from childhood to adolescence.从儿童期到青春期的亲社会行为的神经发育。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2019 Feb 13;14(2):129-139. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsy117.
10
Developmental Changes and Individual Differences in Trust and Reciprocity in Adolescence.青少年时期信任和互惠的发展变化及个体差异。
J Res Adolesc. 2020 Jan;30 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):192-208. doi: 10.1111/jora.12459. Epub 2018 Oct 16.