Duarte J P, Coelho-E-Silva Manuel J, Severino V, Martinho D, Luz L, Pereira J R, Baptista R, Valente-Dos-Santos J, Machado-Rodrigues A M, Vaz V, Cupido-Dos-Santos A, Martín-Hernández J, Cumming S P, Malina R M
University of Coimbra Faculty of Sport Sciences Pavilhao III 3040-156 Coimbra Portugal.
Miguel de Cervantes European University Faculty of Health Sciences Valladolid Spain.
Acta Physiol Hung. 2014 Dec;101(4):496-504. doi: 10.1556/APhysiol.101.2014.009.
The study was aimed to investigate the reproducibility of performance parameters obtained from 10-s maximal cycling effort against different braking forces in young adult athletes. The sample (n = 48) included male athletes aged 18.9-29.9 years (175.5 ± 6.9 cm, 76.2 ± 10.1 kg). The exercise protocol was performed in a cycle-ergometer against a random braking force (4% to 11% of body mass). Intra-individual variation was examined from repeated tests within one week. Descriptive statistics were computed and differences between sessions were tested using paired t-test. The coefficient of correlation between repeated measures, technical error of measurement (TEM), coefficient of variation and ICC were calculated. Agreement between trials was examined using the Bland-Altman procedure. Mean values of peak power were relatively stable when obtained from sampling rates of 50 Hz and ranged between 1068 watt and 1082 watt (t(47) = 1.149, p = 0.256, ES-r = 0.165) or while corresponding to a sampling rate of 1 Hz (t(47) = 0.742, p = 0.462, ES-r = 0.107). Correlations between repeated measures were high (+0.907, 95% CI: +0.839 to +0.947) and TEM about 59.3 watt (%CV = 5.52%; ICC = 0.951, 95% CI: 0.912 to 0.972). The present study suggests that reproducibility of peak power in male adult athletes tended to be acceptable and within individual error appeared unrelated to braking force.
本研究旨在调查年轻成年运动员在10秒最大骑行运动中,针对不同制动力所获得的运动表现参数的可重复性。样本(n = 48)包括年龄在18.9 - 29.9岁的男性运动员(身高175.5 ± 6.9厘米,体重76.2 ± 10.1千克)。运动方案是在功率自行车上针对随机制动力(体重的4%至11%)进行的。通过一周内的重复测试来检查个体内部差异。计算描述性统计量,并使用配对t检验来检验各次测试之间的差异。计算重复测量之间的相关系数、测量技术误差(TEM)、变异系数和组内相关系数(ICC)。使用布兰德 - 奥特曼方法检查各次测试之间的一致性。当采样率为50赫兹时,峰值功率的平均值相对稳定,范围在1068瓦至1082瓦之间(t(47) = 1.149,p = 0.256,效应量r = 0.165),或者当对应采样率为1赫兹时(t(47) = 0.742,p = 0.462,效应量r = 0.107)。重复测量之间的相关性很高(+0.907,95%置信区间:+0.839至+0.947),测量技术误差约为59.3瓦(变异系数%CV = 5.52%;组内相关系数ICC = 0.951,95%置信区间:0.912至0.972)。本研究表明,成年男性运动员峰值功率的可重复性趋于可接受,且个体误差范围内似乎与制动力无关。