Primate Genetics Laboratory, German Primate Center, Leibniz Institute for Primate Research, Kellnerweg 4, Göttingen, 37077, Germany.
BMC Evol Biol. 2014 Sep 4;14:176. doi: 10.1186/s12862-014-0176-1.
The evolutionary history of the Old World monkey tribe Papionini comprising the genera Macaca, Mandrillus, Cercocebus, Lophocebus, Theropithecus, Rungwecebus and Papio is still matter of debate. Although the African Papionini (subtribe Papionina) are generally considered to be the sister lineage to the Asian Papionini (subtribe Macacina), previous studies based on morphological data, nuclear or mitochondrial sequences have shown contradictory phylogenetic relationships among and within both subtribes. To further elucidate the phylogenetic relationships among papionins and to estimate divergence ages we generated mitochondrial genome data and combined them with previously published sequences.
Our mitochondrial gene tree comprises 33 papionins representing all genera of the tribe except Rungwecebus. In contrast to most previous studies, the obtained phylogeny suggests a division of the Papionini into three main mitochondrial clades with similar ages: 1) Papio, Theropithecus, Lophocebus; 2) Mandrillus, Cercocebus; and 3) Macaca; the Mandrillus + Cercocebus clade appears to be more closely related to Macaca than to the other African Papionini. Further, we find paraphyletic relationships within the Mandrillus + Cercocebus clade as well as in Papio. Relationships among Theropithecus, Lophocebus and Papio remain unresolved. Divergence ages reveal initial splits within the three mitochondrial clades around the Miocene/Pliocene boundary and differentiation of Macaca species groups occurred on a similar time scale as those found between genera of the subtribe Papionina.
Due to the largely well-resolved mitochondrial phylogeny, our study provides new insights into the evolutionary history of the Papionini. Results show some contradictory relationships in comparison to previous analyses, notably the paraphyly within the Cercocebus + Mandrillus clade and three instead of only two major mitochondrial clades. Divergence ages among species groups of macaques are similar to those among African Papionini genera, suggesting that diversification of the mitochondrial genome is of a similar magnitude in both subtribes. However, since our mitochondrial tree represents just a single gene tree that most likely does not reflect the true species tree, extensive nuclear sequence data is required to illuminate the true species phylogeny of papionins and to trace possible ancient hybridization events among lineages.
旧世界猴部落 Papionini 包括 Macaca、Mandrillus、Cercocebus、Lophocebus、Theropithecus、Rungwecebus 和 Papio 等属,其进化历史仍存在争议。虽然非洲 Papionini(亚部落 Papionina)通常被认为是亚洲 Papionini(亚部落 Macacina)的姐妹谱系,但基于形态数据、核或线粒体序列的先前研究表明,两个亚部落内部和之间的系统发育关系存在矛盾。为了进一步阐明 Papionini 之间的系统发育关系并估计分化年龄,我们生成了线粒体基因组数据并将其与以前发表的序列相结合。
我们的线粒体基因树包含 33 个 Papionini,代表该部落除 Rungwecebus 以外的所有属。与大多数先前的研究不同,所获得的系统发育表明 Papionini 分为三个主要的线粒体分支,年龄相似:1)Papio、Theropithecus、Lophocebus;2)Mandrillus、Cercocebus;和 3)Macaca;Mandrillus+Cercocebus 分支似乎与 Macaca 的关系比与其他非洲 Papionini 的关系更密切。此外,我们发现 Mandrillus+Cercocebus 分支以及 Papio 中存在并系关系。Theropithecus、Lophocebus 和 Papio 之间的关系仍然没有解决。分化年龄表明,三个线粒体分支内部以及亚部落 Papionina 属之间的早期分裂发生在中新世/上新世边界附近,Macaca 种组的分化发生在与发现的时间尺度相似的时间内。
由于线粒体系统发育的大部分得到了很好的解决,我们的研究为 Papionini 的进化历史提供了新的见解。与以前的分析相比,结果显示出一些矛盾的关系,特别是在 Cercocebus+Mandrillus 分支中的并系关系,以及三个而不是只有两个主要的线粒体分支。Macaca 种组之间的分化年龄与非洲 Papionini 属之间的分化年龄相似,这表明两个亚部落的线粒体基因组的分化程度相似。然而,由于我们的线粒体树只是一个单一的基因树,它不太可能反映真正的物种树,因此需要广泛的核序列数据来阐明 Papionini 的真正物种系统发育,并追踪谱系之间可能存在的古代杂交事件。