• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与结肠镜检查肠道准备相关的YouTube视频分析

Analysis of YouTube videos related to bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

作者信息

Basch Corey Hannah, Hillyer Grace Clarke, Reeves Rachel, Basch Charles E

机构信息

Corey Hannah Basch, Rachel Reeves, Department of Public Health, William Paterson University, Wayne, NJ 07470, United States.

出版信息

World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Sep 16;6(9):432-5. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v6.i9.432.

DOI:10.4253/wjge.v6.i9.432
PMID:25228945
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4163725/
Abstract

AIM

To examine YouTube videos about bowel preparation procedure to better understand the quality of this information on the Internet.

METHODS

YouTube videos related to colonoscopy preparation were identified during the winter of 2014; only those with ≥ 5000 views were selected for analysis (n = 280). Creator of the video, length, date posted, whether the video was based upon personal experience, and theme was recorded. Bivariate analysis was conducted to examine differences between consumers vs healthcare professionals-created videos.

RESULTS

Most videos were based on personal experience. Half were created by consumers and 34% were ≥ 4.5 min long. Healthcare professional videos were viewed more often (> 19400, 59.4% vs 40.8%, P = 0.037, for healthcare professional and consumer, respectively) and more often focused on the purgative type and completing the preparation. Consumer videos received more comments (> 10 comments, 62.2% vs 42.7%, P = 0.001) and more often emphasized the palatability of the purgative, disgust, and hunger during the procedure. Content of colonoscopy bowel preparation YouTube videos is influenced by who creates the video and may affect views on colon cancer screening.

CONCLUSION

The impact of perspectives on the quality of health-related information found on the Internet requires further examination.

摘要

目的

审查有关肠道准备程序的YouTube视频,以更好地了解互联网上此类信息的质量。

方法

在2014年冬季识别出与结肠镜检查准备相关的YouTube视频;仅选择观看次数≥5000的视频进行分析(n = 280)。记录视频创作者、时长、发布日期、视频是否基于个人经验以及主题。进行双变量分析以检验消费者制作的视频与医疗保健专业人员制作的视频之间的差异。

结果

大多数视频基于个人经验。一半由消费者制作,34%的视频时长≥4.5分钟。医疗保健专业人员制作的视频观看次数更多(医疗保健专业人员制作的视频与消费者制作的视频分别为>19400次、59.4%对40.8%,P = 0.037),且更常关注泻药类型和完成准备工作。消费者制作的视频收到更多评论(>10条评论,62.2%对42.7%,P = 0.001),且更常强调泻药的适口性、检查过程中的厌恶感和饥饿感。结肠镜检查肠道准备YouTube视频的内容受视频创作者的影响,可能会影响对结肠癌筛查的看法。

结论

观点对互联网上健康相关信息质量的影响需要进一步研究。

相似文献

1
Analysis of YouTube videos related to bowel preparation for colonoscopy.与结肠镜检查肠道准备相关的YouTube视频分析
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Sep 16;6(9):432-5. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v6.i9.432.
2
Characteristics of YouTube Videos Related to Mammography.与乳房X光检查相关的YouTube视频的特征
J Cancer Educ. 2015 Dec;30(4):699-703. doi: 10.1007/s13187-014-0769-9.
3
Lyme Disease and YouTube : A Cross-Sectional Study of Video Contents.莱姆病与YouTube:视频内容的横断面研究
Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2017 Aug;8(4):289-292. doi: 10.24171/j.phrp.2017.8.4.10. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
4
"It's Totally Okay to Be Sad, but Never Lose Hope": Content Analysis of Infertility-Related Videos on YouTube in Relation to Viewer Preferences.“悲伤完全正常,但永远不要失去希望”:YouTube上与不孕相关视频的内容分析及观众偏好研究
J Med Internet Res. 2018 May 23;20(5):e10199. doi: 10.2196/10199.
5
100 Million Views of Electronic Cigarette YouTube Videos and Counting: Quantification, Content Evaluation, and Engagement Levels of Videos.电子烟YouTube视频浏览量达1亿且仍在增加:视频的量化、内容评估及参与度
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Mar 18;18(3):e67. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4265.
6
YouTube™ as a Source of Instructional Videos on Bowel Preparation: a Content Analysis.YouTube™作为肠道准备教学视频的来源:一项内容分析。
J Cancer Educ. 2016 Dec;31(4):755-759. doi: 10.1007/s13187-015-0888-y.
7
Quality of YouTube Videos Related to Colorectal Cancer Screening.与结直肠癌筛查相关的YouTube视频质量
Cureus. 2023 Jan 12;15(1):e33684. doi: 10.7759/cureus.33684. eCollection 2023 Jan.
8
Content in YouTube Videos for Rosacea: Cross-sectional Study.YouTube 视频中关于酒渣鼻的内容:横断面研究。
JMIR Dermatol. 2021 Feb 10;4(1):e24517. doi: 10.2196/24517.
9
Dissemination of Misinformative and Biased Information about Prostate Cancer on YouTube.YouTube 上有关前列腺癌的错误信息和偏见传播。
Eur Urol. 2019 Apr;75(4):564-567. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.10.056. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
10
Alzheimer's Disease in Social Media: Content Analysis of YouTube Videos.社交媒体中的阿尔茨海默病:YouTube视频内容分析
Interact J Med Res. 2017 Oct 19;6(2):e19. doi: 10.2196/ijmr.8612.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence and Predictors of Posting Health-Related Content Among US Facebook Users: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study.美国脸书用户发布健康相关内容的患病率及预测因素:一项横断面调查研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Jun 10;22(6):918. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22060918.
2
Approaches to Research Ethics in Health Research on YouTube: Systematic Review.YouTube 上健康研究的研究伦理方法:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Oct 4;25:e43060. doi: 10.2196/43060.
3
Quality of YouTube Videos Related to Colorectal Cancer Screening.与结直肠癌筛查相关的YouTube视频质量
Cureus. 2023 Jan 12;15(1):e33684. doi: 10.7759/cureus.33684. eCollection 2023 Jan.
4
Patient-Generated Health Photos and Videos Across Health and Well-being Contexts: Scoping Review.患者生成的健康照片和视频在健康和健康相关领域的应用:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Apr 12;24(4):e28867. doi: 10.2196/28867.
5
YouTube Videos as a Source of Information About Clinical Trials: Observational Study.YouTube视频作为临床试验信息来源的观察性研究。
JMIR Cancer. 2018 Jun 26;4(1):e10060. doi: 10.2196/10060.
6
Readability of information on colonoscopy preparation on the internet.互联网上结肠镜检查准备信息的可读性。
Health Promot Perspect. 2018 Apr 18;8(2):167-170. doi: 10.15171/hpp.2018.22. eCollection 2018.
7
YouTube Videos Related to Skin Cancer: A Missed Opportunity for Cancer Prevention and Control.与皮肤癌相关的YouTube视频:癌症预防与控制的一个错失的机会。
JMIR Cancer. 2015 Mar 2;1(1):e1. doi: 10.2196/cancer.4204.
8
Optimizing bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a guide to enhance quality of visualization.优化结肠镜检查的肠道准备:提高可视化质量指南
Ann Gastroenterol. 2016 Apr-Jun;29(2):137-46. doi: 10.20524/aog.2016.0005.
9
Maintaining the Social Flow of Evidence-Informed Palliative Care: Use and Misuse of YouTube.维持循证姑息治疗的社会传播:YouTube的使用与滥用
Indian J Palliat Care. 2016 Jan-Mar;22(1):104-7. doi: 10.4103/0973-1075.173945.
10
YouTube™ as a Source of Instructional Videos on Bowel Preparation: a Content Analysis.YouTube™作为肠道准备教学视频的来源:一项内容分析。
J Cancer Educ. 2016 Dec;31(4):755-759. doi: 10.1007/s13187-015-0888-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Screening colonoscopy bowel preparation: experience in an urban minority population.城市少数民族人群的结肠镜筛查肠道准备:经验。
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2013 Nov;6(6):442-6. doi: 10.1177/1756283X13498661.
2
Prevalence of missed adenomas in patients with inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy.筛查结肠镜检查中肠道准备不充分患者的腺瘤遗漏率。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Jun;75(6):1197-203. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.01.005. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
3
The impact of suboptimal bowel preparation on adenoma miss rates and the factors associated with early repeat colonoscopy.肠道准备不充分对腺瘤检出率的影响及与早期重复结肠镜检查相关的因素。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Jun;73(6):1207-14. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.01.051. Epub 2011 Apr 8.
4
Socioeconomic and other predictors of colonoscopy preparation quality.社会经济因素及其他因素对结肠镜检查准备质量的预测。
Dig Dis Sci. 2010 Jul;55(7):2014-20. doi: 10.1007/s10620-009-1079-7. Epub 2010 Jan 16.
5
American College of Gastroenterology guidelines for colorectal cancer screening 2009 [corrected].美国胃肠病学会2009年结直肠癌筛查指南[修订版]
Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Mar;104(3):739-50. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.104. Epub 2009 Feb 24.
6
Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.结直肠癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组建议声明
Ann Intern Med. 2008 Nov 4;149(9):627-37. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-9-200811040-00243. Epub 2008 Oct 6.
7
Colonoscopy completion in a large safety net health care system.在一个大型安全网医疗保健系统中完成结肠镜检查。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008 Apr;6(4):438-42. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.12.003. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
8
Utilization of colonoscopy in the United States: results from a national consortium.美国结肠镜检查的使用情况:一项全国性联盟的结果
Gastrointest Endosc. 2005 Dec;62(6):875-83. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2005.06.037.
9
Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study.结肠清洁对结肠镜检查质量和诊断率的影响:欧洲胃肠内镜适宜性专家组欧洲多中心研究
Gastrointest Endosc. 2005 Mar;61(3):378-84. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(04)02776-2.
10
Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia.结肠镜检查准备质量对疑似结肠肿瘤检测的影响。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Jul;58(1):76-9. doi: 10.1067/mge.2003.294.