Higashi Tsunehito, Mai Yosuke, Noya Yoichi, Horinouchi Takahiro, Terada Koji, Hoshi Akimasa, Nepal Prabha, Harada Takuya, Horiguchi Mika, Hatate Chizuru, Kuge Yuji, Miwa Soichi
Department of Cellular Pharmacology, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Central Institute of Isotope Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 17;9(9):e107856. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107856. eCollection 2014.
Cigarette smoke consists of tar and gas phase: the latter is toxicologically important because it can pass through lung alveolar epithelium to enter the circulation. Here we attempt to establish a standard method for preparation of gas phase extract of cigarette smoke (CSE). CSE was prepared by continuously sucking cigarette smoke through a Cambridge filter to remove tar, followed by bubbling it into phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). An increase in dry weight of the filter was defined as tar weight. Characteristically, concentrations of CSEs were represented as virtual tar concentrations, assuming that tar on the filter was dissolved in PBS. CSEs prepared from smaller numbers of cigarettes (original tar concentrations ≤ 15 mg/ml) showed similar concentration-response curves for cytotoxicity versus virtual tar concentrations, but with CSEs from larger numbers (tar ≥ 20 mg/ml), the curves were shifted rightward. Accordingly, the cytotoxic activity was detected in PBS of the second reservoir downstream of the first one with larger numbers of cigarettes. CSEs prepared from various cigarette brands showed comparable concentration-response curves for cytotoxicity. Two types of CSEs prepared by continuous and puff smoking protocols were similar regarding concentration-response curves for cytotoxicity, pharmacology of their cytotoxicity, and concentrations of cytotoxic compounds. These data show that concentrations of CSEs expressed by virtual tar concentrations can be a reference value to normalize their cytotoxicity, irrespective of numbers of combusted cigarettes, cigarette brands and smoking protocols, if original tar concentrations are ≤15 mg/ml.
后者在毒理学上很重要,因为它可以穿过肺泡上皮进入循环系统。在这里,我们试图建立一种制备香烟烟雾气相提取物(CSE)的标准方法。通过用剑桥滤器持续抽吸香烟烟雾以去除焦油,然后将其鼓泡到磷酸盐缓冲盐水(PBS)中来制备CSE。滤器干重的增加被定义为焦油重量。特征性地,CSE的浓度以虚拟焦油浓度表示,假设滤器上的焦油溶解在PBS中。由较少数量香烟制备的CSE(原始焦油浓度≤15mg/ml)显示出细胞毒性与虚拟焦油浓度的相似浓度-反应曲线,但对于由较多数量香烟制备的CSE(焦油≥20mg/ml),曲线向右移动。因此,在装有较多数量香烟的第一个储液器下游的第二个储液器的PBS中检测到细胞毒性活性。由各种香烟品牌制备的CSE显示出细胞毒性的可比浓度-反应曲线。通过连续吸烟和抽吸吸烟方案制备的两种类型的CSE在细胞毒性的浓度-反应曲线、细胞毒性药理学以及细胞毒性化合物浓度方面相似。这些数据表明,如果原始焦油浓度≤15mg/ml,以虚拟焦油浓度表示的CSE浓度可以作为标准化其细胞毒性的参考值,而与燃烧香烟的数量、香烟品牌和吸烟方案无关。