Anderst Ania, Conroy Karena, Fairbrother Greg, Hallam Laila, McPhail Alan, Taylor Vicki
The George Institute for Global Health, Level 5, 1 King Street, Newtown, NSW 2042, Australia. Email:
Sydney Local Health District, Level 11, King George V Building, Missenden Road, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia. Email:
Aust Health Rev. 2020 Sep;44(5):806-813. doi: 10.1071/AH19202.
Objective Consumer and community engagement (CCE) in research is increasingly valued in a contemporary healthcare environment that seeks to genuinely partner with consumers and the wider community. Although there is widespread agreement at research governance levels as to the benefits of CCE in research, there is little available research-based guidance as to how best to proceed with CCE organisationally and how to manage and overcome barriers. The aim of this narrative review was to draw together the available research, review findings and relevant governance-related material and to discuss these in light of a case series among research-engaged consumers in order to chart a practical way forward. Methods A narrative literature review about CCE in research was conducted. Following this, a case series among seven consumers who had been engaged as partners in health research was conducted. Finally, the lived experience of these consumers was explored against the findings of the narrative review. Results In all, 121 papers were identified and reviewed, 37 of which were used to inform the content of this paper. The most important benefits of CCE to both consumers and healthcare researchers were related to improvements in trust between consumer and researchers, and the increased relevance and ethics of research agendas ultimately pursued. Barriers to CCE were found to be pragmatic, attitudinal and organisational. Enabling factors that capitalise on the benefits and help address the barriers to meaningful CCE are outlined and discussed in light of a case series conducted among research-engaged consumers in Australia and internationally. Conclusion Best practice standards, organisational commitments and resources are needed to improve the status quo in Australia and to provide health research end-users with research outcomes that better align with their priorities and needs. What is known about the topic? Consumer and community engagement (CCE) in research is increasing in prevalence and is likely to be beneficial to both consumers and healthcare providers and researchers. What does this paper add? Following review of the available research findings and governance statements about CCE, enabling strategies are presented in light of a case series among Sydney-based research-engaged consumers. What are the implications for practitioners? Barriers to consumer and community engagement can be overcome if well understood and tackled organisationally. The potential benefits of shifting to a fully consumer- or community-engaged healthcare research environment are multifactorial and represent a paradigm shift in favour of evidence-based patient and family-centred care.
目的 在当代医疗环境中,研究中的消费者和社区参与(CCE)越来越受到重视,这种环境寻求与消费者及更广泛的社区建立真正的伙伴关系。尽管在研究治理层面,人们普遍认同CCE在研究中的益处,但关于如何在组织层面最好地推进CCE以及如何管理和克服障碍,几乎没有基于研究的指导意见。本叙述性综述的目的是汇集现有的研究、综述结果和相关的治理相关材料,并根据参与研究的消费者中的一系列案例进行讨论,以规划出一条切实可行的前进道路。方法 对研究中的CCE进行了叙述性文献综述。在此之后,对七名作为健康研究伙伴参与其中的消费者进行了一系列案例研究。最后,根据叙述性综述的结果探讨了这些消费者的实际经历。结果 总共识别并审查了121篇论文,其中37篇用于为本文内容提供信息。CCE对消费者和医疗研究人员最重要的益处与消费者和研究人员之间信任的改善,以及最终所追求的研究议程的相关性和伦理的增强有关。发现CCE的障碍包括实际操作、态度和组织方面的。根据在澳大利亚和国际上参与研究的消费者中进行的一系列案例,概述并讨论了利用这些益处并帮助解决有意义的CCE障碍的促成因素。结论 需要最佳实践标准、组织承诺和资源来改善澳大利亚的现状,并为健康研究的最终用户提供与他们的优先事项和需求更相符的研究结果。关于该主题已知的情况是什么?研究中的消费者和社区参与(CCE)的普及率正在上升,并且可能对消费者、医疗服务提供者和研究人员都有益。本文补充了什么?在对关于CCE的现有研究结果和治理声明进行综述之后,根据悉尼参与研究的消费者中的一系列案例提出了促成策略。对从业者有什么影响?如果能很好地理解并在组织层面加以解决,消费者和社区参与的障碍是可以克服的。转向完全由消费者或社区参与的医疗研究环境的潜在益处是多方面的,代表了一种有利于循证患者和以家庭为中心的护理的范式转变。